On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:56:31 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 01 Oct 2011 at 13:46:37 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> It should be enough with a simple:
>>
>> xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --panning 2048 1536
>>
>> But I can confirm that this is not working while it was months ago so
>> unless xrandr now nee
On Sat 01 Oct 2011 at 13:46:37 +, Camaleón wrote:
> It should be enough with a simple:
>
> xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --panning 2048 1536
>
> But I can confirm that this is not working while it was months ago so
> unless xrandr now needs puting things in a different way I dunno what's
> goin
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:38:44 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>>> Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
>>> techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
>>
>> Yes, I would try to set it with xrandr:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToR
On 01/10/11 05:38, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>>> Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
>>> techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
>>
>> Yes, I would try to set it with xrandr:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12
>
> some (
On Fri 30 Sep 2011 at 14:38:44 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm not getting heads or tails from the web page... can you take an
> educated guess what might work to give me a fair bit of panning room?
Could be a bug, y'know. It's been known to happen:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
Camaleón writes:
>> Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
>> techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
>
> Yes, I would try to set it with xrandr:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12
some (alot) of that is pretty confusing to me.
It seems to
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:55:13 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
(...)
> With that in xorg.conf... I'd have a desktop of that size but when I
> try to use the xorg.conf on this brand new install of debian wheezy it
> just gums up the works... and can't get to X at all.
>
> Is there some way to get a
On Fri 30 Sep 2011 at 07:52:23 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Scott Ferguson writes:
>
> > *Just an example - DO NOT use on your monitor/screen* eg:-
> > xrandr --output LVDS --panning 2048x1536
>
> Whats with the Do NOT part? Harmful in some way?
Scott is possibly pointing out that your maximi
Scott Ferguson writes:
>> Is there some way to get a `Virtual' resolution using whatever
>> techniques are now employed to generate our desktops?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Yes
>
> xrandr --panning
>
> *Just an example - DO NOT use on your monitor/screen* eg:-
> xrandr --output LVDS --panning 2048x1536
Wha
On 30/09/11 10:55, Harry Putnam wrote:
> For many years I've been able to get a really big desktop, so big you
> have to pan around on it. I used some code in xorg.conf to do it, but
> now that X and desktops are generated quite a lot different. I don't
> begin to understand the process but would
For many years I've been able to get a really big desktop, so big you
have to pan around on it. I used some code in xorg.conf to do it, but
now that X and desktops are generated quite a lot different. I don't
begin to understand the process but would like to find a way to get my
old high resoluti
11 matches
Mail list logo
