Quoting Anthony Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Yes, quite right. What I was thinking of was that the terminal you start
> from is effectively out of use as long as X is running because it
> contains the starting-up stuff. You can also kill X from that terminal.
I use a shell function (which t
On 22 Nov 1999, Mike Werner wrote:
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> > This gives me 5 terminals. X comes out in the terminal "above" the one
> > you use for startx; I do this in the last terminal (5) and X is in 6. I
> > believe it is possible to have 64 terminals in all.
>
> Not quite. X will come
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 12:11:26AM -0500, Mike Werner wrote:
> I'm not sure what happens if, for instance, one user was to startx from,
> say, VC 1 and then another user, for example root, was to do startx from
> another VC. Would that start another X on VC 8? I think I'll have to try
> that next
Anthony Campbell wrote:
> This gives me 5 terminals. X comes out in the terminal "above" the one
> you use for startx; I do this in the last terminal (5) and X is in 6. I
> believe it is possible to have 64 terminals in all.
Not quite. X will come out in the VC one higher than the last one that
On 20 Nov 1999, Michael Perry wrote:
> HI all-
>
> I recently decided to show someone that linux had a number of virtual
> console and had known for quite awhile that X ran on the 7th. Imagine my
> surprise when my Debian slink system shows up on VC 2 and there is nothing
> but a blinking cursor
HI all-
I recently decided to show someone that linux had a number of virtual
console and had known for quite awhile that X ran on the 7th. Imagine my
surprise when my Debian slink system shows up on VC 2 and there is nothing
but a blinking cursor on the others besides 1. I know that somewhere t
6 matches
Mail list logo
