Laser144 escribió:
Hi,
On my server (Sarge with Apache2) I am trying to host multiple
websites.
The www.sailmaster.nl and webmail.sailmaster.nl work fine, but
nubicula.xs4all.nl connects to /var/www/apache-default/ and
www.gijpstuiver.nl cannot be reached.
How can I fix this? My /etc/apache2/si
much easier to manage if I
have a separate file per domain.
Regards
Jente Paredis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Laser144
Verzonden: donderdag 26 oktober 2006 10:28
Aan: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Onderwerp: Virtual hosting problem
Hi
Hi,
On my server (Sarge with Apache2) I am trying to host multiple
websites.
The www.sailmaster.nl and webmail.sailmaster.nl work fine, but
nubicula.xs4all.nl connects to /var/www/apache-default/ and
www.gijpstuiver.nl cannot be reached.
How can I fix this? My /etc/apache2/sites-available/default
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 08:00:24PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> I'm running apache2/stable 2.0.54-5, and am not able to get virtual
> hosts to work correctly. All requests are being handled by the default
> virtual host, which is obviously not what I want.
>
> I've defined the following in apach
Try removing the * from
--
Robert Wolfe, MCP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message
From: Todd A. Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian User List
Subject: problems with apache2 and virtual hosting
Date: 25/09/05 00:16
> I'm running apache2/stable 2.0.54-5, and
I'm running apache2/stable 2.0.54-5, and am not able to get virtual
hosts to work correctly. All requests are being handled by the default
virtual host, which is obviously not what I want.
I've defined the following in apache2.conf:
NameVirtualHost *
ServerName www.codegnome.
> Hi,
> I have a machine with a lot of virtual hosts. For that I am using
> apache with mass virtual hosting. Now I have to run awstats on each
> single virtual host. I was curious what is the beste metod to do that ?
> As far as I read I have to have one conf for each virt
Cristi Banciu wrote:
Hi,
I have a machine with a lot of virtual hosts. For that I am using
apache with mass virtual hosting. Now I have to run awstats on each
single virtual host. I was curious what is the beste metod to do that ?
As far as I read I have to have one conf for each virtual host
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: awstats with mass virtual hosting
Hi,
I have a machine with a lot of virtual hosts. For that I am using
apache with mass virtual hosting. Now I have to run awstats on each
single virtual host. I was curious what is the
Hi,
I have a machine with a lot of virtual hosts. For that I am using
apache with mass virtual hosting. Now I have to run awstats on each
single virtual host. I was curious what is the beste metod to do that ?
As far as I read I have to have one conf for each virtual host. I was
curios how is
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 08:07, Cristi Banciu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using apache with mass virtual hosting. I need to keep separate log
> files for each vhosts into something like thist
> /var/log/httpd/$vhost.without.www/$year/$month/$day/access.log
>
> I have found a li
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 08:07, Cristi Banciu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using apache with mass virtual hosting. I need to keep separate log
> files for each vhosts into something like thist
> /var/log/httpd/$vhost.without.www/$year/$month/$day/access.log
>
> I have found a little
Hi,
I am using apache with mass virtual hosting. I need to keep separate log
files for each vhosts into something like thist
/var/log/httpd/$vhost.without.www/$year/$month/$day/access.log
I have found a little perl script that says it does that. Unfortunatelly
it does not working, apache
80 in order to serve http requests, and
this is exactly the port where apache wants to listen on (and apparently
is listening on, if all this mass virtual hosting is actually working).
So I think it is not possible to have apache serve requests to
http://somesite1.com and tomcat requests for http://some
n on (and apparently
> is listening on, if all this mass virtual hosting is actually working).
I can't help with the OPs problem, but Tomcat does run standalone or integrated
into Apache. Makes sense as Tomcat is part of the Apache project. See;
<http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/conne
Roozemond, D.A. wrote:
(although there might be a workaround with bridged networking etc). The
easiest solution I see is letting tomcat run on port 81 (for instance),
and tell apache to redirect any requests for http://www.tomcatsite.com/
to http://www.tomcatsite.com:81/, which tomcat will then ser
m, not a plugin for apache. This means
tomcat needs to listen on port 80 in order to serve http requests, and
this is exactly the port where apache wants to listen on (and apparently
is listening on, if all this mass virtual hosting is actually working).
So I think it is not possible to have apache
Hi,
I have configured apache with mass virtual hosting by adding following
line to apache's conf files.
VirtualDocumentRoot /var/vhosts/%0/httpdocs/
and everything seems to work just fine with a little exception.
Few virtual sites needs tomcat in order to work. I have installed
tomcat
> So from what you did provide the only difference it seems is
> that I'm using NameVirtualHost... And have my mod_vhost directives
> within the block...
That was the key that made my configuration work.
Thanks.
J. Paul Bruns-Bielkowicz
elkowicz wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to setup apache for dynamically configured mass virtual hosting.
> I've followed the documentation explicitly.
>
> LoadModule vhost_alias_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_vhost_alias.so
> UseCanonicalName Off
> LogFormat "%V %h %l
Hi,
I'm trying to setup apache for dynamically configured mass virtual hosting.
I've followed the documentation explicitly.
LoadModule vhost_alias_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_vhost_alias.so
UseCanonicalName Off
LogFormat "%V %h %l %u %t \"%r\" %s %b" vcommon
Cus
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:39:58PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:43:43PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > ...equinomial[1]...
> > [1] no, this isn't a word. but it should be. you get the idea...
>
> It's a damn cool word. I second its introduction to the English
> langua
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
> > server into /var/www. /var isn't made for stuff that's persistens like
> > a homepage! in addition, where do virtual hosts go? in g
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
> server into /var/www. /var isn't made for stuff that's persistens like
> a homepage! in addition, where do virtual hosts go? in general, once
Well I want to tel
Hi !
I really like what Angus has showed about his apache config.
I have "my" option too ;-) - of course...
ATM I can see two major options (no matter where symlinks go):
1) /var/www/$FQDN/, /var/log/apache/$FQDN-{access|error}.log
2) /home/$DOMAINUSER/{somedirhere}/ everything in this dir
IMHO
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> why is debian apache making /var/www be the main directory, and why is
> debian apache not providing an easily extensible location for virtual
> domain data?
>
I think it's because TIMTOWTDI, and everyone has their own
prefere
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:10:38PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> The default web root will be /var/www/default. There must be no files in
> /var/www; as a temporary measure, a daily cronjob may be implemented to
> move all files from /var/www to /var/www/default.
If you really feel that this is nec
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:01:43AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
>> server into /var/www.
>
>Because it can change during normal system operation (rules out /usr
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
> server into /var/www.
Because it can change during normal system operation (rules out /usr
and anything that typically resides on the root device), doesn't
belo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:56:35PM +0100, xio wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:10:38PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
[excessive quoting trimmed]
> > /var/log/apache(2)/default should be symbolic links to the relevant
> > directories.
>
> Why not have virtual and default documents in /var/www/?
>
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:10:38PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
> > server into /var/www. /var isn't made for stuff that's persistens like
> > a homepage! in add
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
> server into /var/www. /var isn't made for stuff that's persistens like
> a homepage! in addition, where do virtual hosts go? in general, once
> a virtual host is
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:43:43PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Daniel Stone (on Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:10:38PM +1000):
> > I think that a symlink from /var to /home is bad. Maybe if we stored it
> > under /home/www-data or such.
>
> that's one possibility, although i am more in favor
we have just founded an apache task force to work on long overdue
issues with apache, so let's continue this thread there, and not on
both lists. if you still have comments about my original post, go
ahead and post them here, otherwise hop on over to
https://lists.madduck.net/mailman/listinfo/d
also sprach Daniel Stone (on Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:10:38PM +1000):
> I think that a symlink from /var to /home is bad. Maybe if we stored it
> under /home/www-data or such.
that's one possibility, although i am more in favor of uniting sites
into single directory hierarchies. what's the big point of
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:27:49AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
> server into /var/www. /var isn't made for stuff that's persistens like
> a homepage! in addition, where do virtual hosts go? in general, once
> a virtual host is
i always wondered just why debian apache puts the main homepage of a
server into /var/www. /var isn't made for stuff that's persistens like
a homepage! in addition, where do virtual hosts go? in general, once
a virtual host is defined, one had better defined a virtual host for
the primary hostname
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:02:27PM -0400, Jason Healy wrote:
> At 989895234s since epoch (05/14/01 22:53:54 -0400 UTC), Scott Raun wrote:
> > I'm Apache 1.3 on potato.
> >
> > I can't get name-based virtual hosting to work.
>
> I too, suffered from this. I
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:53:54PM -0500, Scott Raun wrote:
> I'm Apache 1.3 on potato.
>
> I can't get name-based virtual hosting to work.
>
> I just browsed the archive - I've got the NameVirtualHost IP-address in
> place. I've had the local Linux Use
At 989895234s since epoch (05/14/01 22:53:54 -0400 UTC), Scott Raun wrote:
> I'm Apache 1.3 on potato.
>
> I can't get name-based virtual hosting to work.
I too, suffered from this. I'm not sure if you're having the same problem
that I was, but it turned out that
I'm Apache 1.3 on potato.
I can't get name-based virtual hosting to work.
I just browsed the archive - I've got the NameVirtualHost IP-address in
place. I've had the local Linux User Group mailing list look at my config -
they've had a number of thoughts, none of whic
Not really like that. Don't forget there are hosts out there which have
only one ip-address, so they must use name-based virtual hosting. For this
they must configure their only ip-address as NameVirtualHost. After this
the documentroot in srm.conf is ignored. All ip-names which the
server
bian-user@lists.debian.org>Date:
Monday, March 27, 2000 2:32 PMSubject: Apache virtual
hosting
If I figure my apache web server to allow
virtual hosts,
does the 'DocumentRoot' directive in the main
server
configuration area of httpd.conf get
ignored?
If I figure my apache web server to allow virtual
hosts,
does the 'DocumentRoot' directive in the main
server
configuration area of httpd.conf get
ignored?
By setting up the virtual hosts, do all my
domains
have to be listed in:
And is this now the default directives the all
the
Doc
At http://www.flux.org/linux/mooney.html I came across all these Howto's
for virtual hosting on apache:
. http://www.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
. http://www.apache.org/docs/vhosts/name-based.html
. http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Alias.html
. http://www.apacheweek.com/fea
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 12:36:17PM -0700, Robert Jones wrote:
>
> What version of Apache were you using on Red Hat? Since 1.3, you need to
> explicitly define IP addresses you want to have named-based virtual hosts on
> with the 'NameVirtualHost' directive -- if you were on 1.2, and upgraded to
>
Quoth Bill West on 10 Aug, 1999:
> Strange problem here. I just moved on of my machines at work to debian from
> redhat. The apache server on that machine was doing virtual hosting of
> several sites using the same IP via VirtualName directives. Worked very well
> in fact. Now the d
Strange problem here. I just moved on of my machines at work to debian from
redhat. The apache server on that machine was doing virtual hosting of
several sites using the same IP via VirtualName directives. Worked very well
in fact. Now the debian apache will not do the same thing for some reason
rt sendmail for this to take effect, but you will need to
> restart it later anyway, so don't restart it for now.
< snipped>
Thanks Robert! virtual hosting now works.
Proves once again of a very good tech support for Debian! :)
regards,
= = Andre M. Varon Lasaltech Incorporate
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, A. M. Varon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody has experience with sendmail virtual hosting on a
> Debian slink/potato? Any tips/tricks to share?
I use slink with sendmail on one of my machines doing this.
First of all, put all virtualhosts in the /etc/mail/sendmail.
Hi,
Anybody has experience with sendmail virtual hosting on a
Debian slink/potato? Any tips/tricks to share?
Thanks,
= = Andre M. Varon Lasaltech Incorporated
= = == Technical Head Fax-Tel: (034)435-0836
= == =
= = = E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= WebPage : http
-> > > Is there such a thing? I have a lot domains that I host, but only one IP.
-> >
-> > No. Proftpd can do IP based virtual hosting
->
-> I know, ProFTPd is what I'm currently using, but that won't do...
maybe you should set iit up or upgrade. Anyway
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 Aug 1998, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>
> > Is there such a thing? I have a lot domains that I host, but only one IP.
>
> No. Proftpd can do IP based virtual hosting
I know, ProFTPd is what I'm curre
On 19 Aug 1998, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Is there such a thing? I have a lot domains that I host, but only one IP.
No. Proftpd can do IP based virtual hosting
> Nether proftpd or wu-ftpd-academ can handle this... And I know of only one
> web server that do (which I have runned ha
Is there such a thing? I have a lot domains that I host, but only one IP.
Nether proftpd or wu-ftpd-academ can handle this... And I know of only one
web server that do (which I have runned happily for over a year), and that's
Roxen... But I need a FTPd that can handle this to...
PS. Please Cc to
Has anyone converted to/installed Apache non-IP based Virtual Hosting ?
Please e-mail me, I just had a few basic questions..
Thanks,
Matthew
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
the Edward Blevins writes:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, CoB SysAdmin wrote:
> > Good thing, too. We've got enough IP-space cramping as it is.
> Agreed!
Um ipv6 anyone? Read the specs. Our little 32bit ip pool
is about to get a 96bit boost. (technically 65bits when you
consider that is what they a
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, CoB SysAdmin wrote:
> I should like to mention at this point that there's supposed to be some
> movement toward a convention of the browser notifying the server of what
> host *name* it looked up to get there. So, you could have all the names
> go to one IP and the browsers w
> I should like to mention at this point that there's supposed to be some
> movement toward a convention of the browser notifying the server of what
> host *name* it looked up to get there. So, you could have all the names
> go to one IP and the browsers would say "I was trying to connect to
> www
On Sun, 08 Dec 1996 14:50:56 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Excuse my ignorance, but what is a virtual host? (and what would be the
> advantages to having one?)
A virtual host is a supplemental name attached to a machine. Typically ISP
which host web services (www.yourcompany.com) don't have a
Fundamental writes:
>
[snip]
> Now, what else do i have to do to get this virtual host to work on my
> machine? IF anyone has some advice or can point me in the right direction
> for a HowTO, id much apprecaiate it:)
[snip]
Excuse my ignorance, but what is a virtual host? (and what would be the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Fundamental wrote:
> Now, what else do i have to do to get this virtual host to work on my
> machine? IF anyone has some advice or can point me in the right direction
> for a HowTO, id much apprecaiate it:)
hmm... u have a lot of questions
Hey all. Im running Debian Linux 1.1 and apache 1.1.1. Ive added this to
the bottom of my httpd.conf
ServerName www.b2.com.au
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot/web/docs/b2/
ErrorLoglogs/b2.com.au-error.log
TransferLog log
63 matches
Mail list logo
