On Thursday 23 September 2004 07:02, David Dorward wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> Adding that didn't work. I'll try a new kernel and then build the DRM
> module this evening.
If you just want to get a working X, forget about drm and agpgart, just try to
get X working.
--
_ _ _ _
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
I'm far from an expert, but "Caught signal 11. " didn't means a seg fault?
I think it might do... what I do about it is another question.
Here (http://www.sbellon.de/cl6000.html)
Looks like an updated kernel might be in order.
Option "NoDDCValue"
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:19:27 +0100, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> > Have you looked on google?
>
> First port of call.
>
> > Seems it's supported with the "via" driver
> > (man /usr/X11R6/man/man4/via.4x.gz)...
>
> Somehow I missed that, or rather tried it
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
Have you looked on google?
First port of call.
Seems it's supported with the "via" driver
(man /usr/X11R6/man/man4/via.4x.gz)...
Somehow I missed that, or rather tried it, got some errors, and didn't
probe deeply enough in tracing them as I assumed it was for a different
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:13:31 +0100, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently purchased a laptop which has, according to the label:
>
>"Embedded Castle Rock GFX in CLE266, SMA, 64MB Max"
>
> or, according to lspci:
>
>"VGA compatable controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623
I recently purchased a laptop which has, according to the label:
"Embedded Castle Rock GFX in CLE266, SMA, 64MB Max"
or, according to lspci:
"VGA compatable controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo
CLE266] integrated CastleRock graphics (rec 03)"
I've got it working with XFree86 with
6 matches
Mail list logo
