Re: Varnish

2015-07-13 Thread Lisi Reisz
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Varnish Date: Monday 13 July 2015, 14:42:46 From: Gokan Atmaca To: Lisi Reisz , debian-user@lists.debian.org Varnish cache does not work. (Static files. V4.0) On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 13 July 2

Re: Varnish

2015-07-13 Thread Gokan Atmaca
Varnish cache does not work. (Static files. V4.0) On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 13 July 2015 14:20:02 Gokan Atmaca wrote: > > Hello; > > Static files (HTML, text, CSS, JS, XML) I want to make up memory. > > You will get more replies if y

Re: Varnish

2015-07-13 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 13 July 2015 02:42:34 Gokan Atmaca wrote: > Hello > > I'm using Debian 8. Varnish I installed 4.0.3. A kind of "html, jpeg, png" > file not run from my memory. PHP files are running. > > Sample configuration; > http://paste.debian.net/281658/

Varnish

2015-07-12 Thread Gokan Atmaca
Hello I'm using Debian 8. Varnish I installed 4.0.3. A kind of "html, jpeg, png" file not run from my memory. PHP files are running. Sample configuration; http://paste.debian.net/281658/

Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?

2010-09-28 Thread Siju George
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Gilles Mocellin wrote: > > Yes ! > 600 req/s at Varnish and only 5-10 req/s at Apache behind ! > > Of course, you'll have to tune and adapt to your site, but really woth it, > especially with CMS like Drupal, which are very hungry on res

Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?

2010-09-27 Thread Gilles Mocellin
Le Monday 27 September 2010 12:44:04 Siju George, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations for high > volume websites? > Varnish or Squid ? > > any body using Varnish in production Environments? Yes ! 600 req/s at Varnish a

Re: Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?

2010-09-27 Thread Allan Wind
On 2010-09-27T16:14:04, Siju George wrote: > Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations for high > volume websites? Varnish or Squid ? We are planning on rolling out Varnish in production. Squid is the grand-daddy. Your favorite search engine should pull up some benc

Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations - Varnish or Squid for high volume websites?

2010-09-27 Thread Siju George
Hi, Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations for high volume websites? Varnish or Squid ? any body using Varnish in production Environments? thanks :-) --Siju -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"