Re: VFS panic in 2.6.28

2009-01-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 01/19/2009 01:03 AM, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:30:03PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Cannot open root UUID=blah-blah-fa6507 or unknown-block(0,0) The big difference between Now and Then is that I also moved from booting off of /dev/hda using lilo to /dev/sda using

Re: VFS panic in 2.6.28

2009-01-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 01/19/2009 02:21 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-01-19 03:30 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote: Hi, (Note that I've been rolling my own kernels since 2.6.0, and was even able to make 2.6.27 work.) The boot error is: Cannot open root UUID=blah-blah-fa6507 or unknown-block(0,0) The big difference

Re: VFS panic in 2.6.28

2009-01-19 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-01-19 03:30 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > (Note that I've been rolling my own kernels since 2.6.0, and was even > able to make 2.6.27 work.) > > The boot error is: >Cannot open root UUID=blah-blah-fa6507 or unknown-block(0,0) > > The big difference between Now and Then is that I

Re: VFS panic in 2.6.28

2009-01-18 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:30:03PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >Cannot open root UUID=blah-blah-fa6507 or unknown-block(0,0) > The big difference between Now and Then is that I also moved from > booting off of /dev/hda using lilo to /dev/sda using grub2. > In my home-rolled kernel, I don't use

VFS panic in 2.6.28

2009-01-18 Thread Ron Johnson
Hi, (Note that I've been rolling my own kernels since 2.6.0, and was even able to make 2.6.27 work.) The boot error is: Cannot open root UUID=blah-blah-fa6507 or unknown-block(0,0) The big difference between Now and Then is that I also moved from booting off of /dev/hda using lilo to /dev