Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-16 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
* Daniel Toffetti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > On Friday 15 March 2002 22:55, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > > [ argument snipped ] > > > > You know Manoj, I've come to believe that "moral majority" people, > > even if they look decent and cl

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-16 Thread Daniel Toffetti
On Friday 15 March 2002 22:55, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > [ argument snipped ] > > You know Manoj, I've come to believe that "moral majority" people, > even if they look decent and clueful otherwise, are simply incapable > of understanding this ki

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-16 Thread Daniel Toffetti
On Friday 15 March 2002 22:29, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote: > For gods sake please drop it. This has NOTHING to do with debian in > any sense, so please take it else where. I agree, this has nothing to do with Debian, but it's SO FUNNY !! :) -- Daniel Toffetti --- 'There is no spoon...' -

Re: VERY VERY VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-16 Thread Timothy R. Butler
Hi, Beware, all that tread below enter... The OT Zone. > Ha! You've got that right :-) Of course in the context it probably > includes all forms of what Fundamentalist Christians define as paganism. > That is, to them, anything not within their narrow minded view of their > god is pagan or

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Gary Turner
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 20:19:51 -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: >begin Gary Turner quotation: > >> Well, Satanism is also a religion > >In fact, it is Christianity; a Satanist is simply a Christian who has >decided to be one of the "bad guys". Which explains why Satanists are >generally such juvenile t

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Craig Dickson
begin Gary Turner quotation: > Well, Satanism is also a religion In fact, it is Christianity; a Satanist is simply a Christian who has decided to be one of the "bad guys". Which explains why Satanists are generally such juvenile twits. Craig

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Gary Turner
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:24:49 -0600, Timothy R. Butler wrote: >Hello, > I want to clear up a bit of confusion about my statements. > The double >> stuff is mine--to properly attribute. >> So you're going to dictate how tax money is spent, based on your >> minuscule contribution to the whole? My t

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: [ argument snipped ] You know Manoj, I've come to believe that "moral majority" people, even if they look decent and clueful otherwise, are simply incapable of understanding this kind of argument. Or any other kind, for that matter. Must be som

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Matthew Daubenspeck
For gods sake please drop it. This has NOTHING to do with debian in any sense, so please take it else where. At 06:54 PM 3/15/2002, you wrote: >>"Timothy" == Timothy R Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Timothy> Hello, Timothy> I want to clear up a bit of confusion about my statements.

Re: VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Timothy" == Timothy R Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Timothy> Hello, Timothy> I want to clear up a bit of confusion about my statements. >> So you're going to dictate how tax money is spent, based on your >> minuscule contribution to the whole? My tax dollar is in there, too. >> Yo

VERY OT: On Censorship.

2002-03-15 Thread Timothy R. Butler
Hello, I want to clear up a bit of confusion about my statements. > So you're going to dictate how tax money is spent, based on your > minuscule contribution to the whole? My tax dollar is in there, too. > You want to deny me the benefits of my contribution? No. Let me put it another way, pe