On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 05:35:40PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I need to apologise to the list. I was trying to alter my usual method of
> replying to the list to one that still worked properly, I thought. Clearly
> it didn't and I have broken the thread. So I shall resend the original of
> th
Lisi Reisz grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> Hopefully this will now not break the threading.
I looked at your original reply and I'm not sure how it broke anything;
I saw the usual References: line with valid information in the message
header, and I understand that's how threaded message readers bu
Hopefully this will now not break the threading.
On Friday 16 August 2013 17:10:33 David Guntner wrote:
> Regardless of those preferences, on a mailing list where you don't know
> what mail program someone reading is going to be using, it's always a
> bad idea to use HTML in posting a message. Su
I need to apologise to the list. I was trying to alter my usual method of
replying to the list to one that still worked properly, I thought. Clearly
it didn't and I have broken the thread. So I shall resend the original of
this by my usual method.
:-((
Lisi
On Friday 16 August 2013 17:29:5
On Friday 16 August 2013 17:10:33 David Guntner wrote:
> Regardless of those preferences, on a mailing list where you don't know
> what mail program someone reading is going to be using, it's always a
> bad idea to use HTML in posting a message. Sure, at this point the
> majority of mail readers c
5 matches
Mail list logo
