Kelly Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
>mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
>anyone has been able to get both versions of netscape (not mozilla) to
>work.
>
>The problem seems to me, that they b
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>I've dealt with a number of software packages which have an upgrade path
>but for which older versions may be required for various compatibility
>or interoperability reasons. Ultimately, mature products tend to go for
>configuration files of the form: "swpackage.versio
Well, I got it to work by running it as root in an eterm. I had never
run Netscape 6.0 as root, so its .netscape directory was never 'corrupted'.
This brings up another question: Has the XFree86 architecture changed
from 3.3.6-4.0.1 which allows a non-owner of a terminal to open up an x
window?
on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:53:13AM -0600, Kelly Corbin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
> mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
> anyone has been able to get both versions of netscape (not mozilla) to
Kelly Corbin wrote:
>
> I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
> mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
as long as you install both they both work, there's nothing special
about it.
> anyone has been able to get both versions of netscap
I have seen several people state that they have been able to make
mozilla and netscape work on the same machine, but I was wondering if
anyone has been able to get both versions of netscape (not mozilla) to
work.
The problem seems to me, that they both want to access .netscape, but
they have
6 matches
Mail list logo
