|> But i still got the error about can finding vg_maingroup which i
|> believe is my main filesystem.
I strongly suspect that you are trying to boot a kernel which does not
include LVM support. (Partly because I had very similar problems in
upgrading to 2.6.29 from 2.6.22 and this was the reaso
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM, thveillon.debian <
thveillon.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Joey L wrote :
> > I think i did everything and this is a standard configuration - I did
> > not do anything too crazy !
> > Again - all this is software raid --- the /boot is raid1 and the other
> > volum
Joey L wrote :
> I think i did everything and this is a standard configuration - I did
> not do anything too crazy !
> Again - all this is software raid --- the /boot is raid1 and the other
> volumes are software raid5 The Raid5 has LVM filesystems.
>
> here is fdisk -l :
>
> thor:/home/mjh# fd
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:29:05PM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, thveil...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> > thveillon.debian wrote :
> > >
[snip]
> >
> > Sorry, please ignore my advice to load dm-mod in the initrd, reading the
> > whole thread I saw you are running on software
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, thveil...@gmail.com wrote:
> thveillon.debian wrote :
> >
> > I see nothing that strikes me as odd in your conf, outside of the fact
> > that you only have a single user entry for your new kernel.
> > I think you need to add lvm mapper module to the initrd, echo dm-
thveillon.debian wrote :
>
> I see nothing that strikes me as odd in your conf, outside of the fact
> that you only have a single user entry for your new kernel.
> I think you need to add lvm mapper module to the initrd, echo dm-mod to
> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules like you did for md-mod and rai
Joey L wrote :
>
> Tom - thanks for the points..but need more help !! please
>
> I did as you said -
> 1. echo -e "raid1\nmd_mod\nraid456" >> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
> 2. update-initramfs -u -k 2.6.29
>
> and i saw that the modules all loaded successfully.
> But i still got the error that i
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:22 PM, thveillon.debian <
thveillon.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Joey L wrote :
> > Tom - thanks for the reply -
> > Do you think that is the issue ???
> > I am running mirrored drives for /boot. I can not boot off of lvm.
> > I have the rest of my drives on software
Joey L wrote :
> Tom - thanks for the reply -
> Do you think that is the issue ???
> I am running mirrored drives for /boot. I can not boot off of lvm.
> I have the rest of my drives on software raid5 and i have created lvm
> volume groups and put my / filesystem allong with everything else on th
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Joey L wrote:
> >
>> >
>> fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version -mykernel --revision 1
>> kernel-image kernel-headers
>>
>>
>> Change the "mykernel" string and revision number to differentiate your
>> builds.
>>
>> You are booting from a lvm it seems, may
>
> >
> >
> fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version -mykernel --revision 1
> kernel-image kernel-headers
>
>
> Change the "mykernel" string and revision number to differentiate your
> builds.
>
> You are booting from a lvm it seems, maybe with root on lvm. Do you have
> a separate /boot ? A
Joey L a écrit :
>
> make-kpkg -rfakeroot --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
> sudo dpkg -i ../linux-image-2.6.29custom1.0_deb
>
> Maybe that should sort things out. Let me know if you face further
> problems.
>
>
>
>
> Sorry - i tried to run that command but it g
>
>
> make-kpkg -rfakeroot --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
> sudo dpkg -i ../linux-image-2.6.29custom1.0_deb
>
> Maybe that should sort things out. Let me know if you face further
> problems.
>
Sorry - i tried to run that command but it gave an error - something that
rfakeroot is
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:15:02AM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> True, that will not necessitate a recompile. But, the next time you
> build your kernel, just use
>
> make-kpkg -rfakeroot --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
>
> Also, to easily make an initramfs, I use update-
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:29:32AM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> > You might want to do add "--initrd" to the list of arguments to
> build
> > the ramdisk, which would load the modules required to mount your
> > drives and read the fi
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:29:32AM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> You might want to do add "--initrd" to the list of arguments to build
> the ramdisk, which would load the modules required to mount your
> drives and read the files etc. That should solve the problem.
>
>Thanks for gettin
>
>
> >
> > make-kpkg clean
> > fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
>
> You might want to do add "--initrd" to the list of arguments to build
> the ramdisk, which would load the modules required to mount your
> drives and read the files etc. That should solve the problem.
>
> Than
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Joey L wrote:
> I am running debian etch with - Linux thor 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Dec 25
> 21:08:54 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ; I am running this with Raid 5 and LVM.
>
> I would like to update to 2.6.29 ; I found this article but i am little
> stuck, can you help
I am running debian etch with - Linux thor 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Dec 25
21:08:54 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ; I am running this with Raid 5 and LVM.
I would like to update to 2.6.29 ; I found this article but i am little
stuck, can you help ?
the article is:
http://www.falkotimme.com/howtos/de
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:28:06AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
[..]
> I am thinking of buying a new box from an outfit in the UK Golden
> Electronics. For 170 GBP they will give you a box (no monitor) that has an
> AMD 64 Sempron CPU and a decent hard drive and other gear etc Plus
>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:28:06AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu)
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: dumb question about upgrading the kernel and SATA disks
> >Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:58:18 +0200
> >
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 01:28 +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu)
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: dumb question about upgrading the kernel and SATA disks
> >Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:58:18 +0200
>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu)
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about upgrading the kernel and SATA disks
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:58:18 +0200
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:47:31AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >First you should try installi
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:47:31AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >First you should try installing the kernel available in sarge. Use
> >
> >aptitude install kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7
>
> I did this. It worked.
> uname -a
> Linux spc1-burn4-0-0-cust262 2.6.8-3-k7 #1 Tue Dec 5 23:58:25 UTC 2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu)
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dumb question about upgrading the kernel and SATA disks
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:53:30 +0200
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:47:42PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debian folks,
>
> I a
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:53:30AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:47:42PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > Dear Debian folks,
> >
> > I am running Sarge 3.1 r4 on a 1200MHz AMD Duron chip. I have 256MB of RAM.
> >
> > Linux spc1-burn4-0-0-cust262 2.4.27-2-386 #1 We
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:47:42PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debian folks,
>
> I am running Sarge 3.1 r4 on a 1200MHz AMD Duron chip. I have 256MB of RAM.
>
> Linux spc1-burn4-0-0-cust262 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Wed Aug 17 09:33:35 UTC 2005
> i686 GNU/Linux
>
> uname says that I am runni
Dear Debian folks,
I am running Sarge 3.1 r4 on a 1200MHz AMD Duron chip. I have 256MB of RAM.
Linux spc1-burn4-0-0-cust262 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Wed Aug 17 09:33:35 UTC 2005
i686 GNU/Linux
uname says that I am running the 2.4.27-2 kernel. During the installation
the installer decided to use thi
Mertens Bram wrote:
Serban
Top-posting is considered bad netiquette so please see my response
below.
Mertens
Sorry, but I was never told this before.
On 2006-08-10, Serban Udrea wrote:
[...]
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
...
See the thread entitled "mess" from yesterday/today.
aptitude
Serban
Top-posting is considered bad netiquette so please see my response
below.
On 2006-08-10, Serban Udrea wrote:
[...]
> Johannes, thank you for your help! Nevertheless, I do not understand why
> apt-get does not do the job, why am I supposed to use aptitude, which is
> (if I do interpret co
Hello!
And please excuse the very late answer, some urgent matters hold me off this
issue.
Johannes, thank you for your help! Nevertheless, I do not understand why apt-get does not do
the job, why am I supposed to use aptitude, which is (if I do interpret correctly the
apt-get manpage) a fron
Serban Udrea wrote:
Now to my problem. I have a little server with Debian 3.1 Sarge. A few
days ago I received from debian-security the message regarding problems
with the 2.4.27 kernel: DSA 1097-1 New Kernel 2.4.27 packages fix
several vulnerabilities. Since I have this kernel version installe
Hello,
And thank you for your answer! Unfortunately there are more then two weeks since the
security anouncement was sent. How much can it take to update mirrors?! Is there any other
source I could use besides security.debian.org to make security updates.
Best regards,
Serban Udrea
Jon Dowl
At 1151929950 past the epoch, Serban Udrea wrote:
> A few days ago I received from debian-security the message regarding
> problems with the 2.4.27 kernel: DSA 1097-1 New Kernel 2.4.27 packages
> fix several vulnerabilities. Since I have this kernel version
> installed I tried to upgrade but after
Hello!
And first of all many thanks to the developers of Debian GNU/Linux for the very reliable
distribution!
Now to my problem. I have a little server with Debian 3.1 Sarge. A few days ago I received
from debian-security the message regarding problems with the 2.4.27 kernel: DSA 1097-1 New
Hi!
I've got a new Intel Pentium 4 dual core server with sarge (3.1r1)
installed from the binary-1 CD. (It seems like the e1000 network module
in Debian is too old to support the network cards and I couldn't use the
netinst CD. There are two Intel 82573 gigabit controllers on the
motherboard.)
Sin
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:51:08PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> >>Bill Marcum wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
> I installed Sarge on my machine a while back,
Paul E Condon wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Bill Marcum wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
familiar with my hardware specs and wha
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Bill Marcum wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
> >>familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genker
On Sarge:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
kamaraju kusumanchi escreveu:
The OP is using sarge. AFAIK, Sarge does not have linux-image-2.6.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Marcum wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genkernel (gasp) to
build my kernel. For some reason though it installed a 2.4 kernel instead
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
> I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
> familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genkernel (gasp) to
> build my kernel. For some reason though it installed a 2.4 kernel instead of
> 2.6. How can
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
1) What is genkernel?
It's a Gentoo script for automated kernel generation from source
during the original Gentoo installation. It's distantly comparable to
the scripts in kernel-package, but doesn't require a manual "make
oldconfig" to produce the same effect.
OK, thank you kaja. Sorry about replying directly, gmail doesn't really like the debian mailing list.-- "If practice makes perfect, and no one is perfect, then why practice?"
Ian wrote:
Would that image be the same as if I built the kernel with genkernel?
Keep replies on the list. For instructions on posting to debian-user
please see
http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html
1) What is genkernel?
2) Why do you want to compile the kernel?
3) If you
Ian wrote:
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not
extremely familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used
genkernel (gasp) to build my kernel. For some reason though it
installed a 2.4 kernel instead of 2.6. How can I upgrade my kernel
with out reinstalling or c
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not
extremely familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genkernel
(gasp) to build my kernel. For some reason though it installed a 2.4
kernel instead of 2.6. How can I upgrade my kernel with out
reinstalling or compiling my kerne
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Anita Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>>># apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-powerpc
> [...]
>> ls /boot (see if that new kernel is in there)
>> ls /lib/modules (see if it gave you any modules to go with it)
>
> No no.. This is not intel. It's a Mac
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Anita Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>>># apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-powerpc
> [...]
>> ls /boot (see if that new kernel is in there)
>> ls /lib/modules (see if it gave you any modules to go with it)
>
> No no.. This is not intel. It's a Macintosh.
>
Anita Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>># apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-powerpc
[...]
> ls /boot (see if that new kernel is in there)
> ls /lib/modules (see if it gave you any modules to go with it)
No no.. This is not intel. It's a Macintosh.
In order to install a new kernel it is the b
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:48:30AM +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:25:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
> > > Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
> > > that
I donm't think the necessary packages are on the cds and such (though
I haven't checked). But I don't see why you don't just build up a
tiny base system with the floppy-based kernel, get apt and your
network working, and then compile a kernel "the debian way" as was
suggested earlier. I think tha
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:25:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
> > Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
> > that problem by building my own boot floppy with a newer kernel on
> > it.
>
>
> Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
> Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
> that problem by building my own boot floppy with a newer kernel on
> it.
Why not just get the sources and use kernel-package to make your own
custom
Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
that problem by building my own boot floppy with a newer kernel on
it. What I want to do is to install the system using this, and then,
before rebooting it, up
Firstly I'm moving this to the debian-user list as it's got nothing to do
with KDE.
In future please ask such questions on debian-user, feel free to CC me on
such questions as I maintain the devfsd and lilo packages.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:11, rikiwarren wrote:
> I've downloaded the kernel-imag
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Matthias G. Imhof wrote:
>I am actually having the same problems as the original poster, but my modultils
>are version 2.4.1 which I must have gotten as a deb file from unstable or
>testing.
>
>Any ideas why modconf 2.4.1 does not see the modules in /lib/modules/2.4.1?
"Matthias G. Imhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any ideas why modconf 2.4.1 does not see the modules in
> /lib/modules/2.4.1? insmod and friends can use these modules.
The directory structure under /lib/modules/2.4*/ has changed. It seems
that modconf isn't modified so that it finds the module
I am actually having the same problems as the original poster, but my modultils
are version 2.4.1 which I must have gotten as a deb file from unstable or
testing.
Any ideas why modconf 2.4.1 does not see the modules in /lib/modules/2.4.1?
insmod and friends can use these modules.
Matthias
--
*
* Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040101 17:44]:
>
> unstable is a symlink to sid now. sid is permanent unstable it will
> never be released, it will never be frozen.
Why is this?
rob
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> Mario Olimpio de Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> >> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> >> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> >> > kernels ne
Mario Olimpio de Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Phil Brutsche wrote:
>> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
>> > kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
>>
>> unstable !
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jon Pennington wrote:
> Phil Brutsche wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> >
> > > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> > > kernels need at leas
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> > kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
>
> unstable != t
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> can't find any modules anymore. Is there any package that might
> resolve this or should I ins
Phil Brutsche wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> > kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
>
> unstable != testing
>
> You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
unstable != testing
You need the modutils from unstable (sid). Keep
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:13:47PM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote:
>
> Most of them are available from woody (you don't have to do a full
> upgrade to woody, just upgrade the required parts). modutils 2.3.18
> isn't available however but I found 2.3.23 somewhere in the pool directory
> and it instal
I found a mail from a few days ago (wasn't in the archives yet?) that solved my
problem:
make sure you have at least the following versions:
> > o Gnu C 2.91.66 # gcc --version
> > o Gnu make 3.77 # make --version
> > o binutils
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:41:38AM -0200, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> >
> > > I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> > > /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> > > can't find any modules anymore.
> >
> > You simply need a newer version of moduti
On 3 Jan 2001, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> > /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> > can't find any modules anymore.
>
> You simply need a newer version of modutils.
Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> can't find any modules anymore.
You simply need a newer version of modutils.
You could fetch Unstable's (or, is it already in
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote:
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> can't find any modules anymore. Is there any package that might
> resolve this or should I install modu
Howdy,
I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
/lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
can't find any modules anymore. Is there any package that might
resolve this or should I install modutils from scratch?
Nico
74 matches
Mail list logo
