-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/15 10:36, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> What does "uname -a" report? This should tell you what the running
> kernel version is.
>
> It could be a case of your providing implementing your Virtual
> Private Server using kernel cgroups - e.g. via
Hi
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:14:19PM -0500, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a VPS with a company. The image I initially chose was Debian
> Wheezy. I immediately upgraded to Jessie. I updated the kernel and
> rebooted. However, it seems I can't use iptables:
>
> $ sudo iptables
On 22/02/15 03:14 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
Hi list,
I have a VPS with a company. The image I initially chose was Debian
Wheezy. I immediately upgraded to Jessie. I updated the kernel and
rebooted. However, it seems I can't use iptables:
$ sudo iptables --list
modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/l
Hi list,
I have a VPS with a company. The image I initially chose was Debian
Wheezy. I immediately upgraded to Jessie. I updated the kernel and
rebooted. However, it seems I can't use iptables:
$ sudo iptables --list
modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:557 kmod_search_moddep() could
not open mo
Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
> and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
> would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
> space), then install the new kernel and reboot. Howeve
On 2015-02-14, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>
>> He said this was an encrypted lvm file system, so I believe there's a
>> few more steps involved (although I really know nothing about it).
>
> No.
>
>> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ResizeEncryptedPartitions
>
> The logical volumes to be resized ar
Curt a écrit :
> On 2015-02-14, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Otherwise, you can extend a mounted ext2/3/4 filesystem on an LVM
>> logical volume. However you cannot reduce an ext mounted filesystem.
>
> He said this was an encrypted lvm file system, so I believe there's a
> few more steps involved (
On 2015-02-14, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> Otherwise, you can extend a mounted ext2/3/4 filesystem on an LVM
> logical volume. However you cannot reduce an ext mounted filesystem.
He said this was an encrypted lvm file system, so I believe there's a
few more steps involved (although I really know
Gary Dale a écrit :
>> $ df -h
>> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-root 314M 237M 57M 81% /
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-var 2.7G 318M 2.3G 13% /var
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-usr 8.2G 2.6G 5.2G 34% /usr
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-tmp 360M 2.1M
Iain M Conochie a écrit :
> Having said that, with >100GB disks common now, the fallacy that, just
> because you cannot have a sub 1G / filesystem, that you have to place
> /usr onto that partition, is annoying. In fact, the whole /usr merge to
> me is annoying.
There is no /usr merge requireme
what version of the installer are you using?
if it is an older image i'd try the most recent
before filing bugs.
songbird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lis
Stephen R Guglielmo:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:46:35 +0100
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> Stephen R Guglielmo:
>>> I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
>>> for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant
>>> logs.
>>
>> There's been several complaints about similar
It was until fairly recently general practice to allocate a few hundred
MB to / if /usr and /var were separate. It's only in the last few years
that the size of /lib/modules has really exploded, and /usr now needs
(in practice) to physically live under /.
I once tried to put /lib/modules under i
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:46:35 +0100
Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Stephen R Guglielmo:
> > I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
> > for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant
> > logs.
>
> There's been several complaints about similar issues on this list. I
> am
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:42 -0500
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 11/02/15 10:01 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the
> > update, and received an error claiming "no space left on device."
> > Normally, I would do a force-uninsta
On 2015-02-12, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
>> This is good to know. However I don't understand what you get for your
>> money using an encrypted *LVM* file system if the commodity of resizing
>> (or reallocation) is more or less removed from the picture.
>
> Using LVM-on-encryption means that you only n
On Thursday 12 February 2015 11:31:43 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2015 09:46:35 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
> > > for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant logs.
> >
> > There's been several complaints
On Thursday 12 February 2015 09:46:35 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
> > for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant logs.
>
> There's been several complaints about similar issues on this list. I am
> not sure whether there we
Taking a look into /lib/modules could tell if any older (possibly dispensible)
kernel versions are present on your system.
Regards,
jvp.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:35:32AM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-02-12, Reco wrote:
> >
> > You're right in the case of conventional LVM. But OP is using an
> > encrypted one, and resizing an encrypted LV is much more complex
> > (it requires lvresize, cryptmount and resize2fs in the right sequence
Stephen R Guglielmo:
>
> I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
> and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
> would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
> space), then install the new kernel and reboot. However,
On 2015-02-12, Reco wrote:
>
> You're right in the case of conventional LVM. But OP is using an
> encrypted one, and resizing an encrypted LV is much more complex
> (it requires lvresize, cryptmount and resize2fs in the right sequence).
> It's presumably possible (never done it personally), but co
Hi.
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:42 -0500
Gary Dale wrote:
> The problem is that your / partition only has 314M allocated to it. This
> is ridiculously small. I understand people use LVM because it supposedly
> makes adding more space easier.
You're right in the case of conventional LVM. But OP
On 11/02/15 10:01 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
Hi list,
I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
space), then install the new
Hi list,
I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
space), then install the new kernel and reboot. However, this is an
update, not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 03/07/2014 19:33, B a écrit :
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:12 +0200 François Patte
> wrote:
>
>> Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an
>> entry to the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in
>> case...
>
> Doc's
On 07/03/2014 07:28 PM, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I'd like to install kernel 3.14 on wheezy from backports.
Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an entry to
the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in case...
Tha
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:12 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an entry
> to the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in case...
Doc's on the backport site…
--
There is no doubt that my lawyer is honest. For example, when he
filed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I'd like to install kernel 3.14 on wheezy from backports.
Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an entry to
the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in case...
Thank you
- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématique
2012/7/20 Camaleón :
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:59:05 +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
>
>> a little background and what i did to have come to this situation:
>>
>> - cannot get resolution more than 1024x768 with my integrated intel vga
>> - upgraded to kernel 3.0 from squeeze-backports
>> - my intel w
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:59:05 +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> a little background and what i did to have come to this situation:
>
> - cannot get resolution more than 1024x768 with my integrated intel vga
> - upgraded to kernel 3.0 from squeeze-backports
> - my intel wireless 1000 N wireless int
2012/7/20 Brian :
> On Fri 20 Jul 2012 at 17:37:26 +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
>
>> 02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1000
>
> Non-free firmware is needed. I suppose you have installed it?
>
>http://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi
>
yes I have. I even reinstalled it
On Fri 20 Jul 2012 at 17:37:26 +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> 02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1000
Non-free firmware is needed. I suppose you have installed it?
http://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
On Fri 20 Jul 2012 at 16:59:05 +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> a little background and what i did to have come to this situation:
>
> - cannot get resolution more than 1024x768 with my integrated intel vga
> - upgraded to kernel 3.0 from squeeze-backports
> - my intel wireless 1000 N wireless in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:50:19PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Michael Pobega writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> >> Now one thing about my system is that mounting /usr will be a bit
> >> awkward, since it is lvm over several raid 5 devices.
Michael Pobega writes:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
>> Now one thing about my system is that mounting /usr will be a bit
>> awkward, since it is lvm over several raid 5 devices.
>>
>> Can anyone think of a way to install a kernel .deb without having
>> /
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Michael Pobega writes:
>
> > What I would do is put a live system on a USB flash drive (System Rescue
> > CD is what I usually use) and mount the unbootable hard drive from
> > within the live system. At that point you could wget
Dan Christensen writes:
> Michael Pobega writes:
>
>> What I would do is put a live system on a USB flash drive (System Rescue
>> CD is what I usually use) and mount the unbootable hard drive from
>> within the live system. At that point you could wget a kernel deb from
>> http://ftp.uk.debian.o
Michael Pobega writes:
> What I would do is put a live system on a USB flash drive (System Rescue
> CD is what I usually use) and mount the unbootable hard drive from
> within the live system. At that point you could wget a kernel deb from
> http://ftp.uk.debian.org onto your old mounted hard dri
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:39:18PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
>
> linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
>
> The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
> motherboard and cpu. However, the m
Ron Johnson writes:
> On 02/11/2009 09:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>> I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
>>
>> linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
>>
>> The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
>> motherboard and cpu. Howe
On 02/11/2009 09:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
motherboard and cpu. However, the machine won't boot.
The new
I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
motherboard and cpu. However, the machine won't boot.
The new cpu is a Core2Duo, but even though the kernel is
I installed Etch on a new Sony Vaio TXN-27N, using the default
encrypted root option. Very easy, and it works great - my
congratulations to the Debian installation team!
A 2.6.18 kernel was installed. I would like to upgrade that to
2.6.21, to take advantage of some new Sony-specific features.
Hi folks,
I'm running etch. I recently upgraded my kernel from a self-built 2.4 to
the Debian kernel package version 2.6.17-2-k7. Now, my logs are filled
with (10-20 per hour):
Dec 4 08:56:52 reidster ntpd[2331]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds tolerance
500 PPM
There doesn't seem to be any s
Thanks John,
What is the purpose of the --initrd option? I know it creates a ramdisk
but what is put in there and why should it be needed? I thought the
kernel would have the necessary drivers compiled in to access everything
needed to continue. I noticed this ramdisk in the stock 2.4.27 kernel
bu
It pretty much is that simple, though if you're compiling from source,
you do have to configure the kernel before running make-kpkg. Here's
the steps I usually take:
1) Install kernel-source package of my choosing. This puts a tarball of
the source tree in /usr/src.
2) Untar source tree with
I've recently installed a new machine using the 'testing' branch and it
came with a stock 2.4.27 kernel. I'd like to move to a custom 2.6 kernel
but I'm not not sure of the procedure.
Is it as simple as installing kernel-package, a 2.6 kernel source
package, running make-kpkg against it then insta
Ron Farrer wrote:
On Wed, December 15, 2004 13:18, Ron Johnson said:
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote:
I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve
them.
Is there any way I can
On Wed, December 15, 2004 13:18, Ron Johnson said:
> On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote:
>> I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
>> Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve
>> them.
>>
>> Is there any way I can have apt
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote:
> I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
> Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve them.
>
> Is there any way I can have apt check to see if a new kernel version is
> available and
Hello
Jeremy Brown (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
> Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve
> them.
>
> Is there any way I can have apt check to see if a new kernel version
> is available and if so
I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve them.
Is there any way I can have apt check to see if a new kernel version is
available and if so, obtain it?
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:03:10PM -0400 or thereabouts, Adam Aube wrote:
> sda wrote:
>
> > OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only
> > problem is that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0,
> > so I don't have a network on the Debian box.
> >
> >
sda wrote:
> OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only
> problem is that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0,
> so I don't have a network on the Debian box.
>
> Is there any way to fix this? I did modprobe for Realtek (which I believe
> is my card)
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 02:41:30PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from S.D.A.:
> > I've seen that warning before, and perhaps I'm slow, but what goes there
> > exactly, and where in my liloconf do I put it? initrid=(name of my kernel image?)
>
> This is my grub kernel stanza
Incoming from sda:
> OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only
> problem is
> that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0, so I don't
> have a
> network on the Debian box.
>
> Is there any way to fix this? I did modprobe for Realtek (which I believe
OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only problem is
that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0, so I don't have a
network on the Debian box.
Is there any way to fix this? I did modprobe for Realtek (which I believe is my
card) but there aren't any modu
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 02:41:30PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from S.D.A.:
> > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> > > You'll need to move kernel modules out of the way if the new kernel's
> > > /lib/modules/`uname -r` exists already
Incoming from S.D.A.:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from S.D.A.:
> > >
> > > I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
> > > upgraded my original woody kernel.
> > >
> > > I would like to upgrade my ker
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from S.D.A.:
> >
> > I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
> > upgraded my original woody kernel.
> >
> > I would like to upgrade my kernel to 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386'.
Incoming from S.D.A.:
>
> I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
> upgraded my original woody kernel.
>
> I would like to upgrade my kernel to 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386'. Is it a simple
> manner of just 'aptitude install 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386' or are th
Folks:
I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
upgraded my original woody kernel.
I would like to upgrade my kernel to 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386'. Is it a simple
manner of just 'aptitude install 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386' or are there
additonal steps one nee
Hi,
I have upgraded fr a dial-up to broadband using a Prolink Hurricane 8000 ADSL modem. I have a write-up which shows me how to get this animal working in Linux, based on the 2.6.3 kernel. So I have to get 2.6.3 working in order to get the modem working and not the other way round. It's worse th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jack kinnon wrote:
| Hi
|
| Selecting all the items in Load Module Support doesn't help.
|
| Before the appearance of the "Unresolved symbols ...", the following
statement was executed.
|
| if [-r System.map}; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map
| -b /u
Hi
Selecting all the items in Load Module Support doesn't help.
Before the appearance of the "Unresolved symbols ...", the following statement was executed.
if [-r System.map}; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map
-b /usr/src/linux/debian/tmp-image -r 2.6.3; fi
A typical error msg is as fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jack kinnon wrote:
| Hi,
|
| kernel-package and libncurses5-dev are there.
|
| What I notice is that whatever that I mark as in the configuraion
menu will give rise to the "Unresolved symbols ..." msg.
|
| Has it got to do with module-init-tools? This
Hi,
kernel-package and libncurses5-dev are there.
What I notice is that whatever that I mark as in the configuraion menu will give rise to the "Unresolved symbols ..." msg.
Has it got to do with module-init-tools? This is present and of the right version. I run ver_linux to double-check.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jack kinnon wrote:
| Hi
|
| Thanks for the reply. I checked through .../Documentation/Changes.
| The GNU C minimal is 2.95.3. I have 2.95.4. I have higher version
| than required for 'make', 'binutils', 'util-linux' and
| 'module-init-tools'.
|
| I cann
Hi
Thanks for the reply. I checked through .../Documentation/Changes. The GNU C minimal is 2.95.3. I have 2.95.4. I have higher version than required for 'make', 'binutils', 'util-linux' and 'module-init-tools'.
I cannot do online install under Linux because the modem is not configured for Linu
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:10:11AM -0700, jack kinnon wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion on the kernel. I could not go online under Linux to
> download anything until the modem is configured in. I just realise that the cd I
> have comes with kernel-source-2.4.18. So I carry out th
Hi folks,
Thanks for the suggestion on the kernel. I could not go online under Linux to download anything until the modem is configured in. I just realise that the cd I have comes with kernel-source-2.4.18. So I carry out the steps for upgrading. Was really glad to discover that it supports ppp o
J. Silverman escribió:
Hi All,
I am running a Debian like os, called Morphix (www.morphix.org), and I
would like to upgrade the installed kernel to 2.6. I have talked with
the experts of Morphix, and they said it is possible to upgrade, but
only on a hard drive installation, since it is a Live
Hi All,
I am running a Debian like os, called Morphix (www.morphix.org), and I would
like to upgrade the installed kernel to 2.6. I have talked with the experts
of Morphix, and they said it is possible to upgrade, but only on a hard
drive installation, since it is a LiveCD distro. Since I hav
Hello
Kevin Krumwiede (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm new to Debian and only recently set up my first "working" system.
> Following the security advisory today, I attempted to upgrade my
> kernel with 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get upgrade'. It doesn't show
> any updates available. I do have
On 18 Feb 2004 13:13:50, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
> Following the security advisory today, I attempted to
> upgrade my kernel with 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get
> upgrade'. It doesn't show any updates available.
> Could the problem be that there is no version associated
> with the stock kernel?
S
I'm new to Debian and only recently set up my first "working" system.
Following the security advisory today, I attempted to upgrade my kernel
with 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get upgrade'. It doesn't show any
updates available. I do have the update server in my sources.list:
0:# cat /etc/apt/sour
Hi
Thanks to all who helped, networking is working, all I had to do was add
8139too to /etc/modules.
Many thanks,
Simon
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
-
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> The results from lspci are
>
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3116
> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8633 [Apollo Pro266 AGP]
> 00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3147
> 00:11.1 IDE
Simon Windsor wrote:
Hi
I have just upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20-idepci to 2.4.18-k7 and all appears ok apart from networking.
The server has a RealTek 18139 card that works fine for 2.2, using rt18139. There is no equivalent module for the 2.4.18-k7 kernel, and attempts to try 3x59x, ne2k-pci
10)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc.: Unknown device 8d04
- Original Message -
From: "Rus Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Simon Windsor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: Up
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have just upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20-idepci to 2.4.18-k7 and all appears ok
> apart from networking.
>
> The server has a RealTek 18139 card that works fine for 2.2, using rt18139. There is
> no equivalent module for the 2.4.18-k7 kernel,
Hi
I have just upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20-idepci
to 2.4.18-k7 and all appears ok apart from networking.
The server has a RealTek 18139 card that works fine
for 2.2, using rt18139. There is no equivalent module for the 2.4.18-k7 kernel,
and attempts to try 3x59x, ne2k-pci fail miserabl
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:44:17AM +0200, Jan Agermose wrote:
> I have been handed over the "control" of a debian server -
> and of couse now it startes to misbehave... (and I know
> nothing about debian - sad to say )
>
> I does not really crash totally, as I can still ping the
> server - but l
I have been handed over the "control" of a debian
server - and of couse now it startes to misbehave... (and I know nothing
about debian - sad to say )
I does not really crash totally, as I can still
ping the server - but looking at the server from the outside, this is
really not m
Hello,
I'm trying to install a system with a Intel 82547 LAN controller using
network install, however the e1000 driver doesn't support the 82547
until 2.4.22pre2, are there any netinst cd's that use the 2.4.22 kernel
(or later)? Or is there any way I can create such a cd?
Thank,
Ron
PS. I'm not
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 04:01 pm, Abrasive wrote:
> I've had some trouble posting to this group, so I'm trying again with a
> different mail client.
In the future, I suggest that you use a more descriptive Subject: in your
queries for help. Many list readers glance at the subject to see if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 September 2002 12:44 pm, Amir Tal wrote:
> On Monday 09 September 2002 16:26, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> > installation I realized that the kernel is still v
On Monday 09 September 2002 16:26, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
> How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my
> /etc/apt/sources.list file with
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
> How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my
> /etc/apt/sources.list f
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: upgrading kernel 2.2 to 2.4.19
>Hello
>=20
>I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
>installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
>How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by e
Hello
I just finished net installing Debian
3.0 on my pc. But after installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
How can I upgrade to ver
2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my /etc/apt/sources.list file with the location for the the new kernels. Can somebody
tell me wh
Hi Edward,
it seems that your DVD-ROM is also recognized by ide-scsi (though I don't know
why), so try to mount it as /dev/scd0 (CD-R should then be /dev/scd1).
Maybe to avoid conflict append="hdd=ide-scsi,hdc=scsi".
BTW, does cdrecord work? And can you mount your CD-R to read a CDROM?
HTH, Joac
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:35:05PM -0700, Edward Kleckner wrote:
| I have been running a version of woody from Feb 28, 2002 on a 686
| machine using the 2.2.19 kernel that was installed from a potato cdrom
| set and then the software was updated from another cdrom set to
| woody. Everything was wo
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:35:05PM -0700, Edward Kleckner wrote:
> I have been running a version of woody from Feb 28, 2002 on a 686
> machine using the 2.2.19 kernel that was installed from a potato cdrom
> set and then the software was updated from another cdrom set to
> woody. Everything was wo
I have been running a version of woody from Feb 28, 2002 on a 686
machine using the 2.2.19 kernel that was installed from a potato cdrom
set and then the software was updated from another cdrom set to
woody. Everything was working fine for many days, but xcdroast
complained about cdrecord not work
also sprach ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.19.0147 +0100]:
> > Yeah, okay, I was harsh. For that I'm sorry. But on the plus side, it
> > did have the intended effect of stopping a thread in its tracks, and
> > probably gave some people the idea that, just because they don't use
> > something does
On Friday 18 January 2002 04:28 pm, David B Harris wrote:
[snip]
> Yeah, okay, I was harsh. For that I'm sorry. But on the plus side, it
> did have the intended effect of stopping a thread in its tracks, and
> probably gave some people the idea that, just because they don't use
> something doesn't
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:39:53 -0800
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man, i can't believe that you told dman--one of the most unreservedly
> helpful and still modest people on this list--to shut up. that's damn
> near slapping your mama in the face. dude, apologize.
Well, firstly, I can also be a r
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:39:53PM -0800, ben wrote:
| On Friday 18 January 2002 01:22 pm, David B Harris wrote:
| > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:57:16 -0500
| >
| > dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > Isn't that why I ran "vim /boot/grub/menu.lst" in the first place?
| > > With a configuration as simp
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
