Re: aptitude safe-upgrade and kde4 transition (was: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...)

2009-04-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > On 2009-04-06 08:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > On a side note, I never use the full-upgrade command because it has the > > potential to remove a huge number of packages, and safe-upgrade handles > > most situations

Re: aptitude safe-upgrade and kde4 transition (was: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...)

2009-04-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > On 2009-04-06 08:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > On a side note, I never use the full-upgrade command because it has the > > potential to remove a huge number of packages, and safe-upgrade handles > > most situations

Re: aptitude safe-upgrade and kde4 transition (was: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...)

2009-04-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > Oh well. :-( Looks like I'll have to try the experimental aptitude. Just FYI, I expect to upload a new version in the next week or two with a whole pile of fixes for the dependency solver. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...

2009-04-07 Thread Rick Thomas
On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Rick Thomas > was heard to say: First of all, why does "full-upgrade" say "and 3 not upgraded" when there seem to be only two un-upgradable packages? I wonder if you have holds set on the other three

aptitude safe-upgrade and kde4 transition (was: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...)

2009-04-06 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-04-06 08:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On a side note, I never use the full-upgrade command because it has the > potential to remove a huge number of packages, and safe-upgrade handles > most situations (like library transitions) just fine. But not the transition to kde4, since right no

Re: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...

2009-04-06 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Rick Thomas was heard to say: > First of all, why does "full-upgrade" say "and 3 not upgraded" when > there seem to be only two un-upgradable packages? I wonder if you have holds set on the other three. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...

2009-04-06 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-04-05 23:48 +0200, Rick Thomas wrote: > I'm trying to take one of my G4 Macs from Squeeze to Sid, so I can > investigate the reported problems with the 2.6.29 kernel in Sid on > PowerPC. > > I get the following diagnostic from "aptitude update; aptitude safe- > upgrade": > >> The following

Re: Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...

2009-04-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 17:48 -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > > > The following packages are BROKEN: > > xfce4 xfwm4-themes > > ... ... ... > > 246 packages upgraded, 75 newly installed, 51 to remove and 3 not > > upgraded. > > Need to get 374MB of archives. After unpacking 36.4MB will be freed. > >

Upgrade to Sid from Squeeze not happy...

2009-04-05 Thread Rick Thomas
Hi! I'm trying to take one of my G4 Macs from Squeeze to Sid, so I can investigate the reported problems with the 2.6.29 kernel in Sid on PowerPC. I get the following diagnostic from "aptitude update; aptitude safe- upgrade": The following packages have been kept back: gnumeric-common