On 7/5/22 04:36, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
On 7/3/22 7:51 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 7/3/22 02:31, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
Yesterday I attempted to upgrade Compaq Presario CQ56 laptop to
buster. I followed instructions in 'Chapter 4. Upgrades from Debian 9
(stretch)', so all went well with
El mar, 5 jul 2022 a las 8:39, Miroslav Skoric () escribió:
>
> On 7/5/22 9:37 AM, Tom Dial wrote:
> >
> > Post the output from
> >
> > # fdisk -l (or $ sudo fdisk -l)
> > # vgdisplay -v (or $ sudo vgdisplay -v)
> >
>
> Here it is:
>
> # fdisk -l
> Disk /dev/sda: 298.1 GiB, 320072933376 bytes, 6251
On 7/5/22 9:37 AM, Tom Dial wrote:
Post the output from
# fdisk -l (or $ sudo fdisk -l)
# vgdisplay -v (or $ sudo vgdisplay -v)
Here it is:
# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 298.1 GiB, 320072933376 bytes, 625142448 sectors
Disk model: Hitachi HTS54323
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector si
On 7/3/22 7:51 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 7/3/22 02:31, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday I attempted to upgrade Compaq Presario CQ56 laptop to
buster. I followed instructions in 'Chapter 4. Upgrades from Debian 9
(stretch)', so all went well with a minimal upgrade (apt-get upgrad
On 7/3/22 4:28 PM, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
Haven't tried that, but something else already helped: While it was
idling with fsck in tty1, I went to tty2 and entered: apt --fix-broken
install ... and it did/resumed full upgrade. (Interestingly, this time
it did not complain about no space in /
On 7/3/22 08:28, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
...
Haven't tried that, but something else already helped: While it was idling with
fsck in tty1, I went to tty2 and entered: apt --fix-broken install ... and it
did/resumed full upgrade. (Interestingly, this time it did not complain about
no spa
On 7/3/22 02:31, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday I attempted to upgrade Compaq Presario CQ56 laptop to buster.
I followed instructions in 'Chapter 4. Upgrades from Debian 9
(stretch)', so all went well with a minimal upgrade (apt-get upgrade).
When it finished, I went to the main par
On 7/3/22 1:17 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Ctrl-Alt-F2 brings tty2 from where I can log in, then sudo etc. df -h shows
that filesystem /dev/mapper/localhost-root (mounted on /) is 99% used, and
/dev/mapper/localhost-usr (mounted on /usr) is 100% used.
Apt tends to store files in /var - it's
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 11:31:40AM +0200, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I attempted to upgrade Compaq Presario CQ56 laptop to buster. I
> followed instructions in 'Chapter 4. Upgrades from Debian 9 (stretch)', so
> all went well with a minimal upgrade (apt-get upgrade). When it fi
Hi all,
Yesterday I attempted to upgrade Compaq Presario CQ56 laptop to buster.
I followed instructions in 'Chapter 4. Upgrades from Debian 9
(stretch)', so all went well with a minimal upgrade (apt-get upgrade).
When it finished, I went to the main part of the upgrade (apt
full-upgrade). It
important stuff in your home directory and
anywhere you might have them and go with a fresh install.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Björn Djisktra"
Date: Sep 13, 2014 2:10 AM
Subject: Upgrade issue
To:
Cc:
> Hi,
>
> When I upgraded my system from lenny to s
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:20:09AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> ...where'd i go wrong?
TD> I don't _see_ the problem. But when I'm puzzled by a configuration problem
TD> with lynx, I use the trace options to see what it is actual
On Mon,25.Aug.08, 13:29:24, Ernie Dunbar wrote:
[...]
> On our ns2:
> # apt-cache policy debianutils
> debianutils:
> Installed: 2.8.4
> Candidate: 2.8.4
> Version Table:
> *** 2.8.4 0
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
And how does sources.list look like?
> And on our ns1:
>
> # apt-
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:20:09AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
...
> ...where'd i go wrong?
I don't _see_ the problem. But when I'm puzzled by a configuration problem
with lynx, I use the trace options to see what it is actually loading.
You should be able to do
oldl
> On Mon,25.Aug.08, 11:59:26, Ernie Dunbar wrote:
>
>> No... at worst I'm using Etch already. All I'm doing is using the
>> "unstable" distribution for apt, with this as my sources.list:
>>
>> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable contrib main non-free
>
> Can you please show the output of
On Mon,25.Aug.08, 11:59:26, Ernie Dunbar wrote:
> No... at worst I'm using Etch already. All I'm doing is using the
> "unstable" distribution for apt, with this as my sources.list:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable contrib main non-free
Can you please show the output of 'apt-ca
> On Mon,25.Aug.08, 11:10:22, Ernie Dunbar wrote:
>> Today I tried to do an `apt-get upgrade` on our secondary nameserver,
>> and
>> it died with an error when trying to upgrade Debiantools:
>>
>> Preparing to replace debianutils 2.8.4 (using
>> .../debianutils_2.30_i386.deb) ...
>
> Are you trying
On Mon,25.Aug.08, 11:10:22, Ernie Dunbar wrote:
> Today I tried to do an `apt-get upgrade` on our secondary nameserver, and
> it died with an error when trying to upgrade Debiantools:
>
> Preparing to replace debianutils 2.8.4 (using
> .../debianutils_2.30_i386.deb) ...
Are you trying to update
Today I tried to do an `apt-get upgrade` on our secondary nameserver, and
it died with an error when trying to upgrade Debiantools:
Preparing to replace debianutils 2.8.4 (using
.../debianutils_2.30_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement debianutils ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:50:19PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> gotcha. ok, so it loads lynx now without incident, but it's still
>> using default oldlynx colors, which is at least a step better than default
TD> Some people woul
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:50:19PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TD> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 07:30:17AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
> wrote:
> >> Configuration file "3D3D/tmp/lynxcfg22579" is not available.
> TD> That's mime-encodin
David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DJ> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:48:23AM +, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> gotcha. ok, so it loads lynx now without incident, but it's still
>> using default oldlynx colors, which is at least a step better than default
DJ> Have you looked
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:48:23AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TD> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 07:30:17AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
> wrote:
> >> Configuration file "3D3D/tmp/lynxcfg22579" is not available.
> TD> That's mime-encodin
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 07:30:17AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> Configuration file "3D3D/tmp/lynxcfg22579" is not available.
TD> That's mime-encoding (a nuisance to get rid of unless your newsreader
TD> understands the attachments). He
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 07:30:17AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TD> You don't have to run it with root: "oldlynx" is a script that calls lynx.
> TD> So you could put "oldlynx" in your path and just run it...
>
> $ oldlynx
> ./oldlynx: line
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> You don't have to run it with root: "oldlynx" is a script that calls lynx.
TD> So you could put "oldlynx" in your path and just run it...
$ oldlynx
./oldlynx: line 9: 3D/tmp/lynxcfg22579: No such file or directory
./oldlynx: line 13: 3D/tmp/lynxcfg22579
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 02:10:07AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> thomas, i know you're awesome. & i know you're trying really hard
>> to help me. for some reason, my brain is broken on this. i do not
TD> You don't have to run it
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 02:10:07AM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TD> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:10:17PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
> wrote:
> TD> If lynx thinks there's no color-style file, it'll construct a style from
> TD> the "C
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:10:17PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
TD> If lynx thinks there's no color-style file, it'll construct a style from
TD> the "COLOR" settings that mimics the non-color-style. (It's done that
TD> way intentionally,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:10:17PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TD> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:00:21PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
> wrote:
> >> there's nothing in there about color_style. in fact, the only
> >> thing in the
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TD> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:00:21PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> there's nothing in there about color_style. in fact, the only
>> thing in the entire directory about color_style is in
>> /etc/lynx-cur/lynx.cfg.dpkg-dist, whatever
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:00:21PM +0200, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> # local overides for lynx-cur configuration
> STARTFILE:http://www.debian.org/
> NNTPSERVER:cis.dfn
>
> there's nothing in there about color_style. in fact, the only
> thing in the entire directory about color_s
Cameron Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CH> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (i'll teach you to turn away.) writes:
>> right, i tried putting exactly that in ~/.lynx/colors, but it
>>ignored me. only editing /etc/lynx-cur/lynx.lss changes the colors - &
>>they're laid out ENTIRELY differently from my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (i'll teach you to turn away.) writes:
> right, i tried putting exactly that in ~/.lynx/colors, but it
>ignored me. only editing /etc/lynx-cur/lynx.lss changes the colors - &
>they're laid out ENTIRELY differently from my old lynx color entries,
>which match what you've
Cameron Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CH> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (i'll teach you to turn away.) writes:
>> ok, so i added the directory ~/.lynx & i dumped the color settings
>>into ~/.lynx/colors but it's still green. however, i did find that
>>/etc/lynx-cur has a .lss file in it which ap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (i'll teach you to turn away.) writes:
> ok, so i added the directory ~/.lynx & i dumped the color settings
>into ~/.lynx/colors but it's still green. however, i did find that
>/etc/lynx-cur has a .lss file in it which apparently controls color in a
>totally different la
Cameron Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CH> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (i'll teach you to turn away.) writes:
>> so in fixing my pine issue (see pine thread), i
>>reinstalled/upgraded lynx. the new lynx removed lynx-ssl & installed
>>lynx-cur. the problem there is that it completely ignores my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (i'll teach you to turn away.) writes:
> so in fixing my pine issue (see pine thread), i
>reinstalled/upgraded lynx. the new lynx removed lynx-ssl & installed
>lynx-cur. the problem there is that it completely ignores my color
>preferences, which are fairly important con
so in fixing my pine issue (see pine thread), i
reinstalled/upgraded lynx. the new lynx removed lynx-ssl & installed
lynx-cur. the problem there is that it completely ignores my color
preferences, which are fairly important considering i generally hate
graphics & color & spent some time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running a debian woody mixing stable and testing and very random few
> unstable packages with the 2.4.24 kernel. I just did an apt-get -u
> dist-upgrade and there was a couple upgrades none seemed very significant
> but it bombed out at the end. Now it bombs out ev
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I am running a debian woody mixing stable and testing and very random
>> few
>> unstable packages with the 2.4.24 kernel. I just did an apt-get -u
>> dist-upgrade and there was a couple upgrades none seemed very
>> significant
>> but it bombed out at the end. Now it b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running a debian woody mixing stable and testing and very random few
unstable packages with the 2.4.24 kernel. I just did an apt-get -u
dist-upgrade and there was a couple upgrades none seemed very significant
but it bombed out at the end. Now it bombs out everytime i
I am running a debian woody mixing stable and testing and very random few
unstable packages with the 2.4.24 kernel. I just did an apt-get -u
dist-upgrade and there was a couple upgrades none seemed very significant
but it bombed out at the end. Now it bombs out everytime i do an upgrade
and a coup
Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I had 2.20 version installed on my system and reiserfs was not working.
So I installed kernel-image-2.4.18-386 (apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.18-386). It did configure and then I reboot my box and
the reiserfs started working butsomehow my networking is gone. I can't
get
Hi,
I had 2.20 version installed on my system and reiserfs was not working.
So I installed kernel-image-2.4.18-386 (apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.18-386). It did configure and then I reboot my box and
the reiserfs started working butsomehow my networking is gone. I can't
get my eth0 and eth1 up
I did a dist-upgrade on my sid box tonight, and ran into two debs that
are being a thorn in my side. The first one is
xlibmesa-gl-dev_4.2.1-12.1_i386.deb and the second is
nvidia-glx-dev_1.0.4496-5_i386.deb. Currently I have
[defiant /home/storm]# dpkg -l xlibmesa-gl-dev nvidia-glx-dev
Desired=Unk
Am Donnerstag, 10. Juli 2003 18:40 schrieb Greg Madden:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Something I noticed installing a kernel I compiled without using the initrd
> stuff. I have been using the kernels provided by Debians archives. They do
> the prompt to add 'initrd=/initrd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Something I noticed installing a kernel I compiled without using the initrd
stuff. I have been using the kernels provided by Debians archives. They do
the prompt to add 'initrd=/initrd.img' to lilo.conf. The prompt suggests
adding to the actual sta
At 17:54 9/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 08:16, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > >So your package system has libc6 marked as installed but /lib/libc.so.6
> > >is not there. Is that correct?
> >
> > No, it has /lib/libc.so.6 but it's just a previous version.
> >
> > I gu
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 08:16, Chris McCormick wrote:
> >So your package system has libc6 marked as installed but /lib/libc.so.6
> >is not there. Is that correct?
>
> No, it has /lib/libc.so.6 but it's just a previous version.
>
> I guess this problem is going to be the dpkg race condition that Co
At 22:15 8/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 14:59, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > At 18:32 7/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> >
> > >ls -alF /lib/libc[-.]*
> > >
> > >-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 888096 Sep 26 02:30
> > >/lib/libc-2.1.3.so*
> > >lrwxrwxr
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:15:21PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 14:59, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > At 18:32 7/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> > >ls -alF /lib/libc[-.]*
> > >
> > >-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 888096 Sep 26 02:30
> > >/lib/libc-2.1.3.so*
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 14:59, Chris McCormick wrote:
> At 18:32 7/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
>
> >ls -alF /lib/libc[-.]*
> >
> >-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 888096 Sep 26 02:30
> >/lib/libc-2.1.3.so*
> >lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 13 Oct 7 18:17 /lib/libc.so.6
> >-
At 18:32 7/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 16:40, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > I'm suspecting i might have some kind of broken glibc action going on. I
> > think that it might not be able to re-attach to tar because of an actual
> > corruption in the library binaries
e it's the correct place.
> >
> > I am having a strange apt-get upgrade issue on one of our production boxes:
> >
> > xx:~# apt-get update
> > [this works fine]
> >
> > xx:~# apt-get upgrade
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > B
Hi,
What does your /etc/apt/sources.list say?
Mike
Quoting Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
> Firstly, my apologies if this is the wrong forum to post to, but from what
> I've seen it seems like it's the correct place.
>
> I am having a strange apt-
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:32:22PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 16:40, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > I'm suspecting i might have some kind of broken glibc action going on. I
> > think that it might not be able to re-attach to tar because of an actual
> > corruption in th
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 16:40, Chris McCormick wrote:
> I'm suspecting i might have some kind of broken glibc action going on. I
> think that it might not be able to re-attach to tar because of an actual
> corruption in the library binaries that handle that kind of thing. Maybe
> it's half instal
At 09:36 7/10/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:33:27PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:57, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > > At 12:41 7/10/2002 +0800, you wrote:
> > > >Can you dump it on a webpage and post the URL to the list?
> > >
> > > Sure,
> > > htt
At 13:33 7/10/2002 +0800, you wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:57, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > At 12:41 7/10/2002 +0800, you wrote:
> > >On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:34, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > > > >You could try comparing straces of the dpkg command when it works and
> > > > >when it doesn't work
>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:33:27PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:57, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > At 12:41 7/10/2002 +0800, you wrote:
> > >Can you dump it on a webpage and post the URL to the list?
> >
> > Sure,
> > http://203.59.70.242/strace_dpkg_output.txt
>
> [pi
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:57, Chris McCormick wrote:
> At 12:41 7/10/2002 +0800, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:34, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > > >You could try comparing straces of the dpkg command when it works and
> > > >when it doesn't work
> > > >
> > > >strace -fF dpkg -X packagename.
At 12:41 7/10/2002 +0800, you wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:34, Chris McCormick wrote:
> > >You could try comparing straces of the dpkg command when it works and
> > >when it doesn't work
> > >
> > >strace -fF dpkg -X packagename.deb /path/to/testdir 2>strace.output
> >
> > Excellent suggestio
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:34, Chris McCormick wrote:
> >You could try comparing straces of the dpkg command when it works and
> >when it doesn't work
> >
> >strace -fF dpkg -X packagename.deb /path/to/testdir 2>strace.output
>
> Excellent suggestion - at the moment I can't get it to run correctly
At 12:11 7/10/2002 +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
>Hello there stranger!
Hey Crispin :)
>On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 10:48, Chris McCormick wrote:
> >
> > I've searched through the mailing list archives and found one post where
> > someone had the same problem, but it "mysteriously went away".
> > S
Hello there stranger!
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 10:48, Chris McCormick wrote:
>
> I've searched through the mailing list archives and found one post where
> someone had the same problem, but it "mysteriously went away".
> Sometimes If I manually unpack the archives using dpkg-deb --unpack it
> work
Hi!
Firstly, my apologies if this is the wrong forum to post to, but from what
I've seen it seems like it's the correct place.
I am having a strange apt-get upgrade issue on one of our production boxes:
xx:~# apt-get update
[this works fine]
xx:~# apt-get upgrade
Reading Pac
I have a slink box running on kernel 2.2.17, and I have updated my
/etc/apt/sources.list to point to potato 2.2 tree.
I have ran apt-get update.
Now if I run apt-get dist-upgrade, or anything else apt-get related other
then update... it seg faults.
Anyone care to explain what is happening?
68 matches
Mail list logo
