On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:38:42AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 17, 2019 05:25:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225
> >
> > Sorry. T
On Thursday, October 17, 2019 05:25:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225
>
> Sorry. That link forces you through Twitter. Here are better
> ones:
>
> https://old.lwn.
Art Sackett wrote:
>
> > As for transparent proxies, etc. what I've got here is
>
> ... egg on my face. Never mind...
We've all been there.
Please tell us what, exactly, for the benefit of the archives
and future searchers.
-dsr-
> As for transparent proxies, etc. what I've got here is
... egg on my face. Never mind...
--
Art Sackett
http://www.artsackett.com/
Quoting Art Sackett (2019-10-17 16:01:54)
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:54:36AM -, Curt wrote:
>
> > By what mental procedure did you arrive at that workaround?
>
> I was able to retrieve the various InRelease files with any web
> browser and with wget, but I was not able to do so with apt. S
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:54:36AM -, Curt wrote:
> By what mental procedure did you arrive at that workaround?
I was able to retrieve the various InRelease files with any web browser
and with wget, but I was not able to do so with apt. So, I cranked up
tcpdump and grabbed one of those files
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:15:21PM -, Curt wrote:
[...]
> Still, I don't get why a Debian apt repository would require some recent
> browser user agent string to permit ingress; something seems to be
> missing from this picture.
Definitely. My bet at the moment is on a (ISP?) transparent p
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:15:21PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-10-17, wrote:
[...]
> > IMO this sounds a bit too harsh [...]
> I didn't mean it to be harsh, sorry. I only meant that that bug is the
> OP's bug report concerning the very bug in this thread and not
> some reference to a known [..
On 2019-10-17, wrote:
>
>
>> > This is Debian bug #942478:
>> This is you and your bug.
>
> IMO this sounds a bit too harsh. The OP seems to be seeing this
> behaviour -- perhaps it's not an apt (or a Debian mirror) problem,
> but it'd be nice to know...
I didn't mean it to be harsh, sorry. I o
On 2019-10-17 09:54, Curt wrote:
On 2019-10-16, Art Sackett wrote:
For any who've found this thread by searching for the problem they're
having, the workaround is to create the file
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99useragent and populate it with:
Acquire
{
http::User-Agent "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225
Sorry. That link forces you through Twitter. Here are better
ones:
https://old.lwn.net/Articles/784758/
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cisco-botches-f
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:54:36AM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-10-16, Art Sackett wrote:
> > For any who've found this thread by searching for the problem they're
> > having, the workaround is to create the file
> > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99useragent and populate it with:
> >
> > Acquire
> > {
> >
On 2019-10-16, Art Sackett wrote:
> For any who've found this thread by searching for the problem they're
> having, the workaround is to create the file
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99useragent and populate it with:
>
> Acquire
> {
> http::User-Agent "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/2010
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 05:55:55PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> For any who've found this thread by searching for the problem they're
> having, the workaround is to create the file
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99useragent and populate it with:
>
> Acquire
> {
> http::User-Agent "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:55:55 -0600
Art Sackett wrote:
> For any who've found this thread by searching for the problem they're
> having, the workaround is to create the file
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99useragent and populate it with:
>
> Acquire
> {
> http::User-Agent "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_6
For any who've found this thread by searching for the problem they're
having, the workaround is to create the file
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99useragent and populate it with:
Acquire
{
http::User-Agent "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/60.0";
};
This changes apt's HTTP
Greetings:
I've been seeing 'apt update' failures since yesterday:
# apt update
Err:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable InRelease
Connection failed [IP: 128.61.240.89 80]
Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease
Connection failed [IP: 151.10
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:59:38PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Monday 03 May 2010 12:34:13 Fernando B. Scussel wrote:
> > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y116/fscussel/Untitled.jpg
>
> Ugh. Does copy and paste not work for you? It would be much nicer if that
> text was in the em
Robert Brockway wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
If a full-upgrade (previously known as dist-upgrade) throws errors,
the last
thing you should do is reboot. You should *fix the errors*; your
system may
not reboot cleanly until they are resolved.
Well said. Rebootin
I couldn't copy cause I couldn't install gpm cause nothing works so I just
gave up.
Thanks for everyone who contributed. System got fucked =/
--
From: "Jimmy Johnson"
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:36 PM
To:
Subject: Re:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
If a full-upgrade (previously known as dist-upgrade) throws errors, the last
thing you should do is reboot. You should *fix the errors*; your system may
not reboot cleanly until they are resolved.
Well said. Rebooting in the middle of a dist-
On Monday 03 May 2010 13:36:07 Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > From you output it looks like your 'perl-base' is scheduled to be
> > upgraded. You should try installing the new version of that package with
> > dpkg and then retrying your apt-get/aptitude run.
>
> It's wort
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
From you output it looks like your 'perl-base' is scheduled to be upgraded.
You should try installing the new version of that package with dpkg and then
retrying your apt-get/aptitude run.
It's worth a shot, depending of if dpkg has not been borked, 'dpkg -i
p
On Monday 03 May 2010 12:34:13 Fernando B. Scussel wrote:
> After doing a apt-get dist-update and restarting the pc because of some
> errors
If a full-upgrade (previously known as dist-upgrade) throws errors, the last
thing you should do is reboot. You should *fix the errors*; your system may
n
After doing a apt-get dist-update and restarting the pc because of some
errors I'm getting the problem as show in the image.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y116/fscussel/Untitled.jpg
can't dist-update and system is not working correctly, many missing
libraries which I don't know how to rein
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:27:15PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> On 10/20/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > OK, so one stock that works, one custom that works, room for a new
> > custom to test, and room for a new stock to test. That's room for four
> > kernels, their initrds, an
On 10/20/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, so one stock that works, one custom that works, room for a new
> custom to test, and room for a new stock to test. That's room for four
> kernels, their initrds, and their modules in lib. So how big a / does
Maybe in /boot. But if
Thanks Andrew for the man references. I'll read them carefully before I do
anything. And, yes, I will back up!
Thanks also to Andrei, Celejar and Doug for the discussion of space needed
in /root. My conclusion is that it's better to have a bit too much than a
bit too little.
Richard
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 08:26:33PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> OK, so one stock that works, one custom that works, room for a new
> custom to test, and room for a new stock to test. That's room for four
> kernels, their initrds, and their modules in lib. So how big a / does
> that mean if
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 08:00:06PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:44:54 -0400
> "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > adequate for /. How many kernels do you have installed? How many do
> > you need? Unless you're a kernel developer, you should only need the
> > on
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 08:00:06PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:44:54 -0400
> "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > adequate for /. How many kernels do you have installed? How many do
> > you need? Unless you're a kernel developer, you should only nee
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:44:54 -0400
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> adequate for /. How many kernels do you have installed? How many do
> you need? Unless you're a kernel developer, you should only need the
> one that currently runs, and room for one to be updated.
I u
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 01:59:19PM -0400, Richard Carter wrote:
> Up to now I hadn't thought that /root was full because as df -h shows below
> there is still some space left in /
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/redcube-root
>
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 01:59:19PM -0400, Richard Carter wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments.
>
> Yes, Andrew, you are absolutely correct, I didn't read the output from
> aptitude carefully enough, partly because I didn't understand what much of
> it meant. So I'm especially grateful for your t
Thanks for all the comments.
Yes, Andrew, you are absolutely correct, I didn't read the output from
aptitude carefully enough, partly because I didn't understand what much of
it meant. So I'm especially grateful for your tutorial.
Up to now I hadn't thought that /root was full because as df -h
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:37:14PM -0400, Richard Carter wrote:
> Hi Andrew and Johannes,
>
> My reply of a few hours ago had the wrong subject! Sorry for the mix up.
no problem.
>
> Here is the output copied from aptitude"
its amazing how people don't actually read their apt output (not
direc
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:37:14PM -0400, Richard Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd64 ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-
> image-2.6.18-5-amd64_2.6.18 .dfsg.1-13etch4_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Jerrard wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 18:37 -0400, Richard Carter wrote:
> Hi Richard, what is the output from the command: df -h
> Perhaps / is full not /var?
or /boot?
At least something is full according to
> Unpacking replacement linux
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 18:37 -0400, Richard Carter wrote:
> Hi Andrew and Johannes,
>
> My reply of a few hours ago had the wrong subject! Sorry for the mix
> up.
>
> No Andrew, /var is not full: there is still 2.4GB free out of 2.9GB.
> I have pasted the complete output from aptitude below.
Hi Andrew and Johannes,
My reply of a few hours ago had the wrong subject! Sorry for the mix up.
No Andrew, /var is not full: there is still 2.4GB free out of 2.9GB. I have
pasted the complete output from aptitude below.
Johannes, when I log in as root via tty1 and run aptitude I get the out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard,
Richard Carter wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it but got a similar error. This time
> is said "Sub process /usr/bin/dpkg returned and error code (1)"
Try to log out as ordinary user. Log in as root into tty1 or else. (It
could
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:21:29PM -0400, Richard Carter wrote:
> Johannes,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it but got a similar error. This time
> is said "Sub process /usr/bin/dpkg returned and error code (1)"
is your /var partition perhaps full?
also, more details would be better. so
Johannes,
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it but got a similar error. This time
is said "Sub process /usr/bin/dpkg returned and error code (1)"
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Carter wrote:
> I tried to use the update manager in kde to update
> linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd84, which is already running on my system. The
> update failed with the message
> "/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-
> image-2.6.18-5-amd64-2.6.18.dfsg.
I tried to use the update manager in kde to update
linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd84, which is already running on my system. The
update failed with the message
"/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-
image-2.6.18-5-amd64-2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4-amd64.deb failed in
buffer-write(fd)(10.ret=1)"
How should I respond
p ran out of room"
>and follow the instructions on one of the many hits that will result.
>
>-Roberto
>
>--
>Roberto C. Sanchez
>
Thanks for the hint! I had Googled for "debian kpm update failure
dynamic memory"
but that pulled in nothing relevant. So I came here.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:58:52PM -0700, Paul Schwartz wrote:
> I tried to update the KPM list [running woody] and got
> the following error
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occured while processing xvfb (NewVersion1)
> E: Problem with MergeList
> /
I tried to update the KPM list [running woody] and got
the following error
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occured while processing xvfb (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_.._project_experimental_main_b
This is on a machine loaded with Xandros2 using Xandros Networks to
update KDE. I am on a time limited dialup modem and update the
dependencies one by one to ensure that I get everything in during my
alloted time windows.
I loaded the dependencies in reverse alphabetical order before loading
Problem with Apache(1.3.22)+Tomcat(3.3) after update:
I have a working 2.2.17 system, and am running Apache+Tomcat.
Having not used it for awhile, or updated in 4-6 months, I did an apt-get
install" of tomcat and apache, to get the most current versions. It
did an update, and now it is broken. -
I had thought I copied the list. A fine individual named
Ulf yesterday said "just delete the failed symlink."
I did, and it's all working fine now.
Many thanks, though. That would at least had gotten
deselect and the other failing software working, but
the package dependencies would still have
Hello,
Curt Howland:
> My bug report got no action, since the suggested package to "solve" the
> library problem will not install without the missing file.
I don't know where the file comes from (my system has libdb.so.2), but if
you need a file out of a package, you can always "ar x" and "tar x
Many, many thanks Ulf, deleting the file allowed the
fixed libc6 to install itself ("skipping" may just seem
like an error, but the effected package stillfailed to
install.) and dpkg ran without the:
ian# dselect
dselect: error in loading shared libraries
/usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2: undefin
Subject: Library update failure continues...
Date: Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 09:41:21AM -0700
In reply to:Curt Howland
Quoting Curt Howland([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hail and well met fine Debian fellows.
>
> Unfortunately, I have found (for the second time) that
> I cannot
Hail and well met fine Debian fellows.
Unfortunately, I have found (for the second time) that
I cannot keep up with the debian-user list, so please
address any replies to me personally as well as to the
list.
Several months ago, I tried to update to the "stable"
distribution.It was more broken th
55 matches
Mail list logo
