On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 12:34:53PM -0500, Jonathan Markevich wrote:
> > Not sure if you know this but you can't compile 2.0.x modules with
> > 2.2.x kernel. Just get the 2.2.x version of *everything* and you
> > should be right.
>
> It's more specifically gcc you need. I used gcc272 and all was
>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:29:21PM +, David Wright wrote:
Out of everyone that got and read my message, you're the *only* one that
took offense. Well, that responded anyways. It seems most realized what I
said was extreme frustration and not a personal attack. Please accept my
messages in t
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:12:33PM +0100, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> I don't know nearly anything about this, but... did you activate module
> support in your kernel? It sounds like there has to be such a silly little
> thing that breaks it all.
No kidding, that's what I'm hoping for. And yes,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:25:58AM -0500, Jonathan Markevich wrote:
> Well I have to use 2.0.36. 2.2 doesn't work for me, remember? And I use
> stock kernels because it avoids another level of confusion and
Huh? you should have no trouble with 2.2.
Not sure if you know this but you can't compil
> So I have tried to replace it... reinstalling, trying other kernel versions
> (including this new-fangled kernel 2.2.x thing which is apparently the
> greatest thing since sliced bread, but won't run on a computer with THREE
> SERIAL PORTS!!! Ever heard of a machine so unusual? I mean a shared
I don't know nearly anything about this, but... did you activate module
support in your kernel? It sounds like there has to be such a silly little
thing that breaks it all.
If you compile the kernel properly (at least it happened ok to me when I
had 2.0.36), i.e. (make dep; make clean; make zImage
> Don't upgrade unless you have to. I always have to remind myself of that
> - if my machine is working and I can do the tasks I need to do, even
> though there is a new fangled a super-cool version of my software, I don't
> have to install it. I still need to remind myself.
It's not just super-
Don't upgrade unless you have to. I always have to remind myself of that - if
my machine is working and I can do the tasks I need to do, even though there is
a new fangled a super-cool version of my software, I don't have to install it.
I still need to remind myself.
That said, I just instal
I suppose it's the height of naivite to expect an answer about Debian around
here, but here goes...
Once again... I upgraded to Potato. Yes, stupid, but I'm really really
tired of waiting.
The upgrade thought it a great idea to remove my working alsa-modules
package and replace it with... NOT
9 matches
Mail list logo
