On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:25:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mar 18, 9:10 pm, Rich Healey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps I wasn't clear, I'll try to restate the problem. :)
>
> We have thirteen drive bays with removable SATA disks in a box used
> for backups. The bays are marke
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I had always assumed that the symlinks in /dev/disk/by-path/ worked like
> that
> ...
> If I understand your previous emails correctly then /dev/disk/by-path/
> does not work like that for you. That sounds like a bug of udev and/or
> t
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 19:25:57 -0700, agenkin AT gmail DOT com wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps I wasn't clear, I'll try to restate the problem. :)
>
> We have thirteen drive bays with removable SATA disks in a box used
> for backups. The bays are marked 1 through 13, and mount to /backup/
> drive01 ..
NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:25:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
old disk. The newly inserted disks will have a different UUID, and,
should we use UUIDs, the operation will require reconfiguring the host
to mount the new drives, which is a hassle.
You can use file
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:25:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> old disk. The newly inserted disks will have a different UUID, and,
> should we use UUIDs, the operation will require reconfiguring the host
> to mount the new drives, which is a hassle.
You can use filesystem labels, they are e
On Mar 18, 9:10 pm, Rich Healey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think he means he wants to map a device node to a device _location_
> not a specific device, which happens by default with ide (ie, hda being
> ide primary master).
>
> using fstab with uuid's would mean that the same physical disk alwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob McGowan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 4:00 pm, Thierry Chatelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There are numerous threads on how to fix the problem. Google should
>>> be your
>>> friend on that one
>>
>> I've searched a lot. All
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 18, 4:00 pm, Thierry Chatelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are numerous threads on how to fix the problem. Google should be your
friend on that one
I've searched a lot. All the matches I'm getting are about tying
device names to specific *drives* or about s
On Mar 18, 4:00 pm, Thierry Chatelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are numerous threads on how to fix the problem. Google should be your
> friend on that one
I've searched a lot. All the matches I'm getting are about tying
device names to specific *drives* or about solving boot-time issues.
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 20:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have a backup box (running Debian/Etch) with thirteen SATA disks
> connected to it:
There are numerous threads on how to fix the problem. Google should be your
friend on that one
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
We have a backup box (running Debian/Etch) with thirteen SATA disks
connected to it:
- four to the on-board controller
- seven to an 8-port add-on controller
- two to a 2-port add-on controller
At reboot the Linux kernel inconsistently numbers "sda,b,c,...": it
can start with either of these three.
11 matches
Mail list logo
