On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:19:56 +, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 25 Nov 2011 at 16:59:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> If his majesty Laius would had the option of doing a Google search, he
>> had found his own article (and so what the future reserved for him...)
>> written at the "Olympuspedia" :-P
>
>
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 at 16:59:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
> If his majesty Laius would had the option of doing a Google search, he
> had found his own article (and so what the future reserved for him...)
> written at the "Olympuspedia" :-P
Olympuspedia would never capture the imagination. It's not
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:18:01 +, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 24 Nov 2011 at 18:52:59 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Ancient Greeks went to Oracle at Delphi to get answers. Now we have
>> Google ;-)
>
> King Laius would have benefitted from a good dose of skeptism too. :)
If his majesty Laius would ha
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:38:05 +, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 24 Nov 2011 at 19:11:16 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> PMFJI. What is an rkhunter "deep scan"? I use rkhunter but am not aware
>> of any "deep scan" option.
>
> 'deep scan' mode was a planned but unimplemented addition to rkhunter's
> ca
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 at 19:11:16 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> PMFJI. What is an rkhunter "deep scan"? I use rkhunter but am not aware
> of any "deep scan" option.
'deep scan' mode was a planned but unimplemented addition to rkhunter's
capabilities. From the unpublished manual:
--deep-scan
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 at 18:52:59 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Ancient Greeks went to Oracle at Delphi to get answers. Now we have
> Google ;-)
King Laius would have benefitted from a good dose of skeptism too. :)
> I'm afraid the rootkit is not distribution specific.
>
> I would run a deep scan with
Nov 2011 12:00:27 +0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I see this message when I call `top'
> >>> >
> >>> > Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
> >>> >
> >>> > What happen?
> >>>
> &
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:52:59 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> I'm afraid the rootkit is not distribution specific.
>
> I would run a deep scan with the mentioned tool (rkhunter) to be sure.
PMFJI. What is an rkhunter "deep scan"? I use rkhunter but am not aware
of any "deep scan" option.
Thanks.
> > I see this message when I call `top'
>>> >
>>> > Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
>>> >
>>> > What happen?
>>>
>>> Wow... found this on Google:
>>
>> Someone was bound to. :)
Ancient Greeks went to Oracle at Delphi to get a
:-
Original post talks abount RHEL and CentOS.
http://www.bigismore.com/web-server-security/unknown-hz-value-assume-100-youve-been-hacked/
???
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 23 Nov 2011 at 17:36:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On
On Wed 23 Nov 2011 at 17:36:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:27 +0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
> > I see this message when I call `top'
> >
> > Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
> >
> > What happen?
>
> Wow... found this o
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:27 +0100
Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> I see this message when I call `top'
>
> Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
>
> What happen?
>
>
upgrade / reinstall the procps package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:27 +0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> I see this message when I call `top'
>
> Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
>
> What happen?
Wow... found this on Google:
***
So you got rooted by SHV4 / SHV5 rootkit...
http://www.huweb.hu/maques/mblog/?p=153
*
+0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
>> I see this message when I call `top'
>>
>> Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
>>
>> What happen?
>
> More information, please. Which version of Debian? What architecture is
> being used? Do you only install softwa
On Wed 23 Nov 2011 at 12:00:27 +0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> I see this message when I call `top'
>
> Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
>
> What happen?
More information, please. Which version of Debian? What architecture is
being used? Do you only install software
I see this message when I call `top'
Unknown HZ value! (92) Assume 100.
What happen?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAHEyzgrOo
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:03:14PM -0700, August MacBeth wrote:
| Derrick,
|
| supposedly when machines are up for a lng ass time, procps gets
| whacked and this error starts popping up.. solution: reboot or upgrade
| to a new(er) version of procps.
Ok, thanks. I think I'll wait a while an
t
> | again to see if it went away and it came back with the same info. i
> | google'd a bit but couldn't find anything..
> |
> | Checking `inetd'... Unknown HZ value! (0) Assume 100.
> | not infected
>
> Run 'bash' as root and you might see the
st MacBeth wrote:
| i'm getting some strange output from chkrootkit on one of my woody
| servers. can anyone tell me what this means? i ran chkrootkit
| again to see if it went away and it came back with the same info. i
| google'd a bit but couldn't find anything..
|
| Checking `i
t couldn't find anything..
|
| Checking `inetd'... Unknown HZ value! (0) Assume 100.
| not infected
Run 'bash' as root and you might see the same message :
# bash
Unknown HZ value! (26) Assume 100.
I have no idea what is printing this message or why. I do know that
o
i'm getting some strange output from chkrootkit on one of my woody
servers. can anyone tell me what this means? i ran chkrootkit
again to see if it went away and it came back with the same info. i
google'd a bit but couldn't find anything..
Checking `inetd'... Unknown HZ v
ge since it is not really
> harmful? Why not send to syslog or somewhere else?
Oops! This is not the linux kernel problem, but the "procps" package problem.
This is probably a work-around:
1. $ apt-get source procps
2. $ cd procps-VERSION
3. edit proc/sysinfo.c
165c165
< fprin
>
> I don't know. But the HZ value is set in /etc/login.defs, in my case
> like this:
>
> ENV_HZ HZ=100
>
>
> Also, quoted from 'man login.defs':
>
> ENV_HZ (string)
> This parameter specifies a value for an HZ environ�
> ment parameter. Example usage is:
>
>
Patrick Hsieh said:
> Hello list,
>
> I began to see this message when I type ps in Debian woody kernel 2.4.16.
> I searched the google and was noticed that it could be a bug in libproc.
> Is it true? Any way to fix this problem?
>
not really a bug, just a harmless message. I first enocuntered th
"Patrick" == Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> Hello list, I began to see this message when I type ps in
Patrick> Debian woody kernel 2.4.16. I searched the google and was
Patrick> noticed that it could be a bug in libproc. Is it true?
Patrick> Any way to fix
I saw this on linux-kernel mailing list.
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2001-21/0756.html
So what can I do for my Debian woody?
--
Patrick Hsieh<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG Pubilc Key at http://www.ezplay.tv/~pahud/pahudatezplay.pubkey
MD5 checksum: b948362c94655b74b33e859d58b8de9
Hello list,
I began to see this message when I type ps in Debian woody kernel 2.4.16. I
searched the google and was noticed that it could be a bug in libproc.
Is it true? Any way to fix this problem?
My system info:
# uname -a
Linux luke 2.4.16 #7 SMP Thu Dec 13 09:09:23 CST 2001 i686 unknown
#
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 17:32, Paul Gonsior wrote:
> Can I get an idea of what this message means please when I perform a ps x?
Let me guess; this is on a machine that's been on for a while, isn't
it? It's a known kernel bug, in that there's an arithmetic overflow in
calculating the uptime after 2^
Can I get an idea of what this message means please when I perform a ps x?
--
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete it and notify the sender.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 04:16, Dave Whiteley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a server that has been running sweetly for almost a
> year. Yesterday I did my regular upgrade via dselect while installing
> inn, and it has now started printing messages:-
>
> Unknown HZ value! (22) Ass
Hello,
I have a server that has been running sweetly for almost a
year. Yesterday I did my regular upgrade via dselect while installing
inn, and it has now started printing messages:-
Unknown HZ value! (22) Assume 100.
It does this reliably before the output of a 'ps'. I think I have
> mail:~# uptime
> Unknown HZ value! (0) Assume 100.
> 1:31pm up 249 days, 2:39, 2 users, load average: 0.10, 0.03,
> 0.01
did some more research and it seems it is a bug in the kernel,
but procps detects it and spits out the message. the procps
in woody claims to have a fix t
that
recently passed the 220-230 day uptime. a couple weeks ago
the mrtg graphs for a mailserver completly inversed out
of nowhere(nothing changed on the system).
very odd! here is the error:
mail:~# uptime
Unknown HZ value! (0) Assume 100.
1:31pm up 249 days, 2:39, 2 users, load average: 0.10
33 matches
Mail list logo
