Re: /dev/pts (aka UNIX98 ptys) needed?

2002-09-11 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:47:24PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: > > Will anything break if I dont have /dev/pts support compiled into my > > kernel? > > If you have devfs enabled? No, I think devfs subsumes devpts > filesystem support. But if you don't use devfs, you probably do want > /dev/pts s

Re: /dev/pts (aka UNIX98 ptys) needed?

2002-09-11 Thread David Z Maze
Shaya Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Will anything break if I dont have /dev/pts support compiled into my > kernel? If you have devfs enabled? No, I think devfs subsumes devpts filesystem support. But if you don't use devfs, you probably do want /dev/pts support (and make sure your /etc/f

Re: /dev/pts (aka UNIX98 ptys) needed?

2002-09-10 Thread Tom Goulet (UID0)
> Will anything break if I dont have /dev/pts support compiled into my > kernel? Probably not. -- Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

/dev/pts (aka UNIX98 ptys) needed?

2002-09-10 Thread Shaya Potter
Will anything break if I dont have /dev/pts support compiled into my kernel? thanks, shaya -- please cc: responses to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Unix98 ptys don't seem to be working

1999-10-26 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:56:01 -0500, Jeff Hildebrand wrote: > I believe that I have done everything necessary to get them working: > > - kernel in use is 2.2.12, compiled with Unix98 ptys and pty filesystem > - glibc 2.1.2 (and ldso upgraded to the necessary level) Your system

Unix98 ptys don't seem to be working

1999-10-26 Thread Jeff Hildebrand
So I'm testing out various pppoe clients for linux for the local telco, but they all seem to require Unix98 ptys. I believe that I have done everything necessary to get them working: - kernel in use is 2.2.12, compiled with Unix98 ptys and pty filesystem - glibc 2.1.2 (and ldso upgraded t

Re: Unix98 PTYs

1999-09-24 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 08:50:47 -0400, Salman Ahmed wrote: > I decided to compile in support for Unix98 PTYs since I am already using > glibc-2.1. Being the newbie that I am, I can't tell the differences b/w > Unix98 PTYs and the old style ttys (is that right?). Well, ptys (ps

Unix98 PTYs

1999-09-24 Thread Salman Ahmed
but the Debian system is way better. Kudos to whoever designed the make-kpkg system. I decided to compile in support for Unix98 PTYs since I am already using glibc-2.1. Being the newbie that I am, I can't tell the differences b/w Unix98 PTYs and the old style ttys (is that right?). I am hoping

Unix98 ptys

1999-09-17 Thread Seth R Arnold
Hello once again. aterm requires Unix98 ptys. This is something I know nothing about. All I know is that they are different from oldstyle pty stuff. I run 2.0.36 on potato right now. (I am hesitant to upgrade to 2.2.x due to problems I have had in the past with dhcp I did the 2.0.x to 2.2.x