On 08/10/2023 01:45, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 08:27:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
In the current case, "aptitude search '~Plsb-base'" does the trick.
Why on EARTH was this not ported to apt-patterns(7)?
It is one of two features I miss in "apt list".
Another one is --sh
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 10:47:58AM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote on 07/10/2023 20:45:
> > unicorn:~$ apt list '?provides(~nlsb-base)'
> > Listing... Error!
> > E: input:0-21: error: Unrecognized pattern '?provides'
> > ?provides(~nlsb-base)
> > ^
Greg Wooledge wrote on 07/10/2023 20:45:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 08:27:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Yes, aptitude can do that. Quoting the manual[1]:
,
| ?provides(pattern), ~Ppattern
|
| Matches package versions which provide a package that matches the
| pattern. For instance,
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 08:27:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Yes, aptitude can do that. Quoting the manual[1]:
>
> ,
> | ?provides(pattern), ~Ppattern
> |
> | Matches package versions which provide a package that matches the
> | pattern. For instance, “?provides(mail-transport-ag
On 2023-10-07 19:24 +0200, Steve Keller wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
>
>> Package: sysvinit-utils
>> [...]
>> Provides: lsb-base (= 11.1.0)
>>
>> When you remove the physical lsb-base package, the virtual package
>> provided by sysvinit-utils remains, to satisfy the dependencies of
>> ntpsec, r
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 07:24:24PM +0200, Steve Keller wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
>
> > Package: sysvinit-utils
> > [...]
> > Provides: lsb-base (= 11.1.0)
> >
> > When you remove the physical lsb-base package, the virtual package
> > provided by sysvinit-utils remains, to satisfy the depende
Greg Wooledge writes:
> Package: sysvinit-utils
> [...]
> Provides: lsb-base (= 11.1.0)
>
> When you remove the physical lsb-base package, the virtual package
> provided by sysvinit-utils remains, to satisfy the dependencies of
> ntpsec, rsync, etc.
OK, that explains, why lsb-base can be removed
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 01:04:56PM +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2023 13:47 +0200, from keller.st...@gmx.de (Steve Keller):
> > # aptitude purge lsb-base
> > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > lsb-base{p}
> > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove
On 7 Oct 2023 13:47 +0200, from keller.st...@gmx.de (Steve Keller):
> But how can this then be explained?
>
> # aptitude why lsb-base
> i ntpsec Depends lsb-base
> # aptitude show ntpsec | grep ^Depends
> Depends: adduser, lsb-base, netbase, python3, python3-ntp (=
> 1.2.2+dfsg1
I've always thought, that a package's dependencies must be full-filled
to install that package and that apt-get automatically manages these
dependencies. And also, that if I remove a package, that all other
packages are removed, that depend on it. Like this:
# aptitude purge bind9-libs
T
10 matches
Mail list logo
