On 07/02/2010 12:40 PM, Daniel Barclay wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote:
UUIDs are unique to the device/filesystem.
Are these (disk) UUIDs stored somewhere in the partition (in the
filesystem), or are they stored at or generated from a lower level?
In the superblock.
# dumpe2fs -h /dev/mapper/ma
Aaron Toponce wrote:
UUIDs are unique to the device/filesystem.
Are these (disk) UUIDs stored somewhere in the partition (in the
filesystem), or are they stored at or generated from a lower level?
In particular, if one used dd to copy the contents (a file system) of
one partition to another p
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:42:28 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 06/23/2010 03:30 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:02:36 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
>>> Whether or not these are his reasons, I can tell you why that is a
>>> wise move. UUIDs are unique to the device/filesystem. The major
On 06/23/2010 03:30 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:02:36 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
>> Whether or not these are his reasons, I can tell you why that is a wise
>> move. UUIDs are unique to the device/filesystem. The major advantage of
>> using UUIDs is that you don't have to worry abo
On 20100623_054331, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/23/2010 05:20 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Alan Chandler
> >wrote:
> >
> >>I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
> >>
> [snip]
> >>
> >>Which do I use, and what does the other one mean?
> >>
> >
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:02:36 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 06/23/2010 09:47 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:40:22 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
>>> I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
>>
>> Mmm... any strong reason for doing that? :-)
>
> Whether or not
On 06/23/2010 09:47 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:40:22 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
>> I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
>
> Mmm... any strong reason for doing that? :-)
Whether or not these are his reasons, I can tell you why that is a wise
move. UUIDs
On 23/06/10 11:20, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Alan Chandler
mailto:a...@chandlerfamily.org.uk>> wrote:
I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
...
Get your uuid from dumpe2fs -h /dev/vg/lv | grep UUID
But /dev/vg/lv is a persistent name,
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:40:22 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
Mmm... any strong reason for doing that? :-)
I'm with Lenny and the old naming method ("/dev/sdx") is the default for
"/etc/fstab".
(...)
> if I look in /dev/disk/by-id I
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Alan Chandler
wrote:
> I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
>
> However after installation I added the following line
>
> /dev/raid/bak /bak ext4 defaults 0 2
>
> which I now need to convert to a uuid (/dev/raid/
On 06/23/2010 05:20 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Alan Chandler
wrote:
I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
[snip]
Which do I use, and what does the other one mean?
Get your uuid from dumpe2fs -h /dev/vg/lv | grep UUID
But /dev/vg/l
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Alan Chandler
wrote:
> I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
>
> However after installation I added the following line
>
> /dev/raid/bak /bakext4defaults0 2
>
> which I now need to convert to a uuid (/dev/raid
I feel I should move my entire /etc/fstab over to using uuids
However after installation I added the following line
/dev/raid/bak /bakext4defaults0 2
which I now need to convert to a uuid (/dev/raid/bak is an lv on the
"raid" volume group)
if I look in /dev/dis
13 matches
Mail list logo
