Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:02:49 +0300 andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: > On Lu, 06 mai 19, 14:16:13, Celejar wrote: ... > > I'm no expert, but I struck out in my search for a free, > > standards-based email service beyond the giants. I have a number of GMX > > accounts, and while they're not quite G

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Lu, 06 mai 19, 14:16:13, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:18:31 +0200 (CEST) > Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 May 2019, Celejar wrote: > > > > > I once looked into ProtonMail, but IIUC, there's no POP3 / IMAP / SMTP > > > support in the free tier, and even in the paid tiers, sta

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Lu, 06 mai 19, 10:28:12, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2019 18:37:36 +1000 > David wrote: > > >I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care > >would be significantly higher than the general population though. > >That's why I was concerned enough to respond, and why

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:53:56 -0400 Kenneth Parker wrote: Hello Kenneth, >I don't notice any Advertising on ProtonMail. The 'cost' will not necessarily be advertising. Data-mining all emails in and out of the account is far more likely and, potentially, more lucrative (for the miner, obviously).

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2019, Celejar wrote: > > > I once looked into ProtonMail, but IIUC, there's no POP3 / IMAP / SMTP > > support in the free tier, and even in the paid tiers, standards-based > > email requires running some sort of prop

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019, Celejar wrote: I once looked into ProtonMail, but IIUC, there's no POP3 / IMAP / SMTP support in the free tier, and even in the paid tiers, standards-based email requires running some sort of proprietary application called "ProtonMail Bridge" on my machine. Correct me if I'm

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:53:56 -0400 Kenneth Parker wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2019, 7:20 AM Pierre Frenkiel > wrote: > > > >> I have no data to support that, > > it's > > >> just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email > > >> addresses tha

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, May 6, 2019, 7:20 AM Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > >> I have no data to support that, > it's > >> just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email > >> addresses that are in use here. > > > > does that mean that there is something else,

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 13:20:31 +0200 (CEST) Pierre Frenkiel wrote: Hello Pierre, > I was not clear enough. I didn't mean "gratis" or "free as in beer", > but I understood that, but thanks for the clarification. To answer your question: > does that mean that there is something else, i.e. a "fr

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: On Mon, 6 May 2019, Brad Rogers wrote: I have no data to support that, it's just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email addresses that are in use here. does that mean that there is somet

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019, Brad Rogers wrote: I have no data to support that, it's just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email addresses that are in use here. does that mean that there is something else, i.e. a "free" mail provider? be

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 18:37:36 +1000 David wrote: Hello David, >I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care >would be significantly higher than the general population though. >That's why I was concerned enough to respond, and why I wrote >people *here* :) Fair point. I wou

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 17:22, Brad Rogers wrote: > > On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:26:00 +1000 David wrote: > > Hello David, > > >People here care about software freedom. > > Some do, yes. Far more simply don't care: I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care would be significan

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:26:00 +1000 David wrote: Hello David, >People here care about software freedom. Some do, yes. Far more simply don't care: You only have to look at how successful surveillance companies (google, facebook, twitter, et al) have become; with people willingly, even eagerly, h

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

> On May 5, 2019, at 4:26 PM, David wrote: > > For pastebin purposes within Debian, please use: https://paste.debian.net/ Thanks, David. This sound like exactly what I need. Rick

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 20:31, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 5 May 2019 03:13:46 -0700 Rick Thomas wrote: > > >What is “pastebin”? Is it available to everyone? > > Yes, it's available to all. pastebin.com Hi. No, please don't use pastebin.com I won't read anything posted to that site, and I dou

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On 5/5/19 12:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On May 5, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: What do you recommend instead? The original file was 365KB. The compressed file was 48KB. Remove the irrelevant parts. But 365 kB isn’t too much anyway. What's the (exact) size limit then

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Sun 05 May 2019 at 00:06:56 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > > On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System > > wrote: > > > > : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] > > said: > >550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) > > Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl20.pobox.c

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

Rick Thomas composed on 2019-05-05 03:06 (UTC-0700): > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote >> You should simply not send compressed attachments, especially for text. > What do you recommend instead? The original file was 365KB. The compressed > file was 48KB. using web browser: https://en.wikip

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Sun, 5 May 2019 03:13:46 -0700 Rick Thomas wrote: Hello Rick, >What is “pastebin”? Is it available to everyone? A place to share (predominantly) code snippets and the like for the purposes of critique or garnering advice about ways to improve said code. Yes, it's available to all. pastebi

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rick Thomas wrote: > Thanks for the reply! > >> On May 5, 2019, at 2:55 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: >> >> There are other places things can be put (own web site, pastebin, etc.) > > I used to have my own webserver, but the machine I was running it on di

Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

Thanks for the reply! > On May 5, 2019, at 2:55 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: > > There are other places things can be put (own web site, pastebin, etc.) I used to have my own webserver, but the machine I was running it on died. What is “pastebin”? Is it available to everyone? Enjoy! Rick

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> On May 5, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: > > What do you recommend instead? The original file was 365KB. The compressed > file was 48KB. Remove the irrelevant parts. But 365 kB isn’t too much anyway. Adrian

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> On May 5, 2019, at 2:34 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > > > >> On May 5, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: >> >> The file was “.zip” compressed on a Mac — not “.gz’ on a Linux. Do you >> think that makes a difference? > > You should simply not send compressed attachments,

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> On May 5, 2019, at 12:45 AM, Pierre Frenkiel > wrote: > > On Sun, 5 May 2019, Rick Thomas wrote: > >> >> >>> On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System >>> wrote: >>> >>> : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] >>> said: >>> 550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to end o

List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

On Sun, 5 May 2019 10:04:02 +0200 Frank Scheiner wrote: Hello Frank, >Strange indeed, maybe that was changed. But no longer allowing >attachments is not that useful. Stops ppl sending unnecessary guff to the list (emojis, html, anim-gifs...), not that that applies necessarily to your situation.

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> On May 5, 2019, at 1:04 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > On 5/5/19 09:06, Rick Thomas wrote: >> >> >>> On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System >>> wrote: >>> >>> : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] >>> said: >>>550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to e

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> On May 5, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > > The file was “.zip” compressed on a Mac — not “.gz’ on a Linux. Do you think > that makes a difference? You should simply not send compressed attachments, especially for text. Adrian

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Sun, 5 May 2019, Frank Scheiner wrote: Hi Rick, On 5/5/19 09:06, Rick Thomas wrote: On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote: : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said: 550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sas

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

Hi Rick, On 5/5/19 09:06, Rick Thomas wrote: On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote: : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said: 550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl20.pobox.com Hmmm… I was trying to attach t

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Sun, 5 May 2019, Rick Thomas wrote: On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote: : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said: 550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl20.pobox.com Hmmm I was trying to attach the syslo

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> On May 4, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Mail Delivery System > wrote: > > : host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said: >550 5.7.1 No attachments allowed (in reply to end of DATA command) > Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl20.pobox.com Hmmm… I was trying to attach the syslog file from a failing install.

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

I do not have on any youtube video's and hulu has quit working altogether, telling me to try clearing the cache wich I have done. I have also tried installing the latest version of adobe and has not worked. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Mail Delivery System < mailer-dae...@mdfmta002.tch.inty.ne

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Sunday 28 June 2015 05:27:08 Jayson Willson wrote: > No, I have understood everything, what was being discussed in this thread. > My comment about sensible-* command itself was just a comment, which meant > "these programs are however not to convenient to use". Sorry. The problem was that some

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

No, I have understood everything, what was being discussed in this thread. My comment about sensible-* command itself was just a comment, which meant "these programs are however not to convenient to use". Sorry.

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Sat 27 Jun 2015 at 21:48:32 +0300, Jayson Willson wrote: > sensible-editor (browser, pager) is too long and not convenient to > auto-complete. Pity This mail appears to relate to https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/06/msg01553.html Its writer appears to lack the comprehension to unde

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

sensible-editor (browser, pager) is too long and not convenient to auto-complete. Pity

Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

PROGRAM AJÁNLAT SIÓFOK ROYAL MEDITERRAN VENDÉGHÁZ!¬ 8600 Siófok Barosss G. u. 27/B TISZTELT HÖLGYEM ,URAM! Ajánlom a március 15-.ei hétvégére :Keressék fel Siófok városát-Pihenjenek

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

> Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> Hello List, >> >> A pair of user asked me to create a common folder: >> what is the (best) Debian way to do it ? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Jerome >> >> Please could you make it clear. I don't understand your question . > Whether is it folder or common user directory.

Undelivered mail:

UWAGA! Wiadomość zawierająca wymienione poniżej atrybuty nie została dostarczona, ponieważ zawiera obiekt, który nie może być przetestowany przy użyciu programu antywirusowego. Administrator zabrania przesyłania takich wiadomości. Nadawca = debian-user@lists.debian.org Odbiorcy = [EMAIL PROTECT

Undelivered mail: hello

UWAGA! Wiadomość zawierająca wymienione poniżej atrybuty nie została dostarczona, ponieważ zawiera obiekt, który nie może być przetestowany przy użyciu programu antywirusowego. Administrator zabrania przesyłania takich wiadomości. Nadawca = debian-user@lists.debian.org Odbiorcy = [EMAIL PROTECT

Undelivered mail: Good day

UWAGA! Wiadomość zawierająca wymienione poniżej atrybuty nie została dostarczona, ponieważ zawiera obiekt, który nie może być przetestowany przy użyciu programu antywirusowego. Administrator zabrania przesyłania takich wiadomości. Nadawca = debian-user@lists.debian.org Odbiorcy = [EMAIL PROTECT

Undelivered mail: private?

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged) Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = private? Message-ID = ??? Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been

Undelivered mail: Re: Your text

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged) Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = Re: Your text Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following vir

Undelivered mail: hi

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged) Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = hi Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has

Re: Need help on postfix [MAILER-DAEMON@desk: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 08:10:46PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: | I still just don't know what to do about Postfix. My hostname is | "desk". Ok. | My ISP is comcast.net -- should I tell postfix my "mail name" | is comcast.net, so mail appears to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] from | things like popu

Need help on postfix [MAILER-DAEMON@desk: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

valid email for the From; how do I do this for Postfix? I'm running Sid just OOB and half my mail is being rejected. - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliv

Undelivered mail: Hello

Dear User, The message with following attributes has not been delivered. because contains an infected object. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = Hello Message-ID = <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- plain] - Ok body.pif i

Undelivered mail: hi

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged) Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = hi Message-ID = i0VFsKsW069147 Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has

Undelivered mail: Hi

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (may be forged) Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = Hi Message-ID = i0SEs66T015193 Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has

Undelivered mail: Thank you!

Dear User, The message with following attributes has not been delivered. Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = Thank you! Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- DrWeb report --- [text:plain] - Ok details.pif infected with Win32.HLLM.Reteras

[MAILER-DAEMON@bmrb.wisc.edu: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

ded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:25:06 -0500 (CDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender ... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host bmrb.wisc.edu[144.92.167.201] said: 550 <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Undelivered mail...help!

Adam Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Okay, so I don't know what I've done, but I have like 30 or 40 > messages in /var/spool/mail/new which were undeliverable due to a typo in > exim.conf. This is now fixed, but exim seems to have given up on > delivering them. What do I do? > Adam, D

Re: Undelivered mail...help!

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:09:04AM -0400, Adam Bell wrote: > Okay, so I don't know what I've done, but I have like 30 or 40 > messages in /var/spool/mail/new which were undeliverable due to a typo in > exim.conf. This is now fixed, but exim seems to have given up on > delivering them. What

Undelivered mail...help!

Okay, so I don't know what I've done, but I have like 30 or 40 messages in /var/spool/mail/new which were undeliverable due to a typo in exim.conf. This is now fixed, but exim seems to have given up on delivering them. What do I do? --adam b.