On 2010-01-13 at 14:11:50 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Or he can do what the rest of the world is doing and buy a flat panel LCD
> monitor, where no such thing as a vertical refresh rate exists, nor flicker,
> nor
> eye fatigue. Thus, he could keep his S3 card, running at the highest res and
> c
Stephen Powell put forth on 1/13/2010 1:00 PM:
> On 2010-01-13 at 13:41:16 -0500, Paul E Condon wrote:
>> A different way of putting my question is: Is it really your eyes that
>> cannot detect, or is it that you mind that cannot perceive the
>> flicker?
>
> That's a good question. I wish I had a
On 2010-01-13 at 13:41:16 -0500, Paul E Condon wrote:
> A different way of putting my question is: Is it really your eyes that
> cannot detect, or is it that you mind that cannot perceive the
> flicker?
That's a good question. I wish I had a good answer to go with it.
Obviously, higher is better.
On 20100113_115748, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On 2010-01-13 at 07:18:51 -0500, Stanis??aw T. Findeisen wrote:
> > What are those sync frequency ranges?
>
> The sync frequency ranges that the X server assumes for a
> non-EDID monitor when nothing is specified for them
--- snip all the interesting st
4 matches
Mail list logo
