On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:20:08 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
(...)
>>> I am so happy with LXDE that I wish I had switched sooner, but until
>>> Fedora 15 came out I had been contented and familiar enough with
>>> GNOME2 not to make the effort to evaluate alternatives.
>>>
>>> All this is my personal
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:05:31 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-09-05, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> The problem with clinging to GNOME2 is that the GNOME project will no
>>> longer develop it, so unless someone forks the whole kit and caboodle,
>>> it will eventually die off.
>>
>> Yep, but GNOM
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:32:27 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> >> I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME
> >> 3.0 in openSUSE and did not feel good with i
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:32:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
>>> openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I
On 2011-09-05, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
>>> openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it changes a lot
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
>> openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it changes a lot
>> when wheezy comes out... and there i
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
> openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it changes a lot
> when wheezy comes out... and there is also the fallback mode.
The problem with "fallback mode" is t
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 20:25:03 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:19:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> Does anyone know how to solve this?
>>
>> I guess this is something related to the migration to GTK3 and GNOME3.
>> I'd say we have to be patient.
>
> Well, I don't wish to b
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 19:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-09-04 18:32 +0200, Chir0n wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after an "aptitude dist-upgrade" to testing (and to unstable too) some GTK2
> > applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
> >
> > Gnome-terminal and Epiphany are two of th
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:19:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:32:57 -0300, Chir0n wrote:
>
>> after an "aptitude dist-upgrade" to testing (and to unstable too) some
>> GTK2 applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
>
> Yep, here also, at least in my VM that runs wheezy (scr
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:32:57 -0300, Chir0n wrote:
> after an "aptitude dist-upgrade" to testing (and to unstable too) some
> GTK2 applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Yep, here also, at least in my VM that runs wheezy (scrolls and menus are
like GTK1 old-style).
> Gnome-terminal and
On 2011-09-04 18:32 +0200, Chir0n wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after an "aptitude dist-upgrade" to testing (and to unstable too) some GTK2
> applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
>
> Gnome-terminal and Epiphany are two of them.
They are not, because they are not GTK2 applications anymore. Thi
Hi all,
after an "aptitude dist-upgrade" to testing (and to unstable too) some GTK2
applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Gnome-terminal and Epiphany are two of them.
I tried install testing and after a "aptitude upgrade" the problem returned.
Does anyone know how to solve this?
Thn
13 matches
Mail list logo
