On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:07:51PM -0500, David A. Cobb wrote:
> I haven't read the whole thread, so please pardon me if I repeat something.
>
> One area that causes many conflicts has Ubuntu "ahead" of Debian.
> Ubuntu is stabilized on Python 2.4, whereas Debian packages all demand
> <2.4 (Pyt
I haven't read the whole thread, so please pardon me if
I repeat something.
One area that causes many conflicts has Ubuntu "ahead" of Debian.
Ubuntu is stabilized on Python 2.4, whereas Debian packages all demand
<2.4 (Python 2.3 is "official").
The problem is exacerbated because 'apt' int
Derek Broughton wrote:
> Why is a legitimate question a troll? Sid & Dapper _are_ both routinely
> "testy" (I prefer not to say "broken" - it's not as if it shouldn't be
> expected). Asking which is less broken may be naive but there's no reason
> to assume it's malicious. And asking of only _on
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Michael Beattie wrote:
>> That may be so, but why are you using dapper instead of breezy anyway?
>
> More important questions are:
>
> a: why is he crossposting what looks to be a troll to both mailing lists
> and...
>
> b: why are people replying to what looks like a tr
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
I'm not. I like Debian 'testing' except when it has missing and broken
packages (like it does now) so I switched to Debian 'unstable'. This
is very recent and so far/therefore I haven't experienced much
trouble. I was wondering about an alternative switch to Dapper
'un
On 11/30/05, Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/30/05, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > >From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's unstable is
> > generally more broken than Debian's, making me feel safer using Sid.
> > Could anyone confirm t
Michael Beattie wrote:
> That may be so, but why are you using dapper instead of breezy anyway?
More important questions are:
a: why is he crossposting what looks to be a troll to both mailing lists and...
b: why are people replying to what looks like a troll to both mailing lists? :)
--
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's unstable is
> generally more broken than Debian's, making me feel safer using Sid.
> Could anyone confirm this.
Not categorically, since I no longer use Sid, but Dapper's not seriously
broken. It upgrades fine, bu
On 11/30/05, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> >From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's unstable is
> generally more broken than Debian's, making me feel safer using Sid.
> Could anyone confirm this.
> Thanks...
>
That may be so, but why are you using dapper i
Hello.
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's
> unstable is generally more broken than Debian's
It depends. Ubuntu has a 6 month release cycle, and early in the cycle
the 'unstable' (currently - Dapper) is generally broken, while near the
end of the cycle it
Hello,
>From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's unstable is
generally more broken than Debian's, making me feel safer using Sid.
Could anyone confirm this.
Thanks...
11 matches
Mail list logo
