Re^3: UVC cameras

2011-02-17 Thread peasthope
* From: Sjoerd Hardeman * Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:24:00 +0200 > Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab > the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe > you can fix things. "luvcview -L" lists formats MJPEG, RGB3, BGR3, YU12 an

Re^2: UVC cameras

2011-02-16 Thread peasthope
* From: Sjoerd Hardeman * Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:24:00 +0200 > Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab > the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe > you can fix things. Thanks for the tip. The camera is now a Microsoft (R

Re: UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman
Op 12-10-10 18:05, Camaleón schreef: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > >> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: >>> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to >>> use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritat

Re: UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: >> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to >> use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. >> >> Recently I put an inexpen

Re: UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread Eike Lantzsch
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: > Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use > the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. > > Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in > Skype. Oddly

UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread PETER EASTHOPE
Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled with the c