On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Thomas Adams wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 1998 at 08:19:13PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
>
> > April 1. The matter is that during dialing from minicom it performs kind
> > of maping. So 1->9, 2->8, 3->7...9->1, 0->0. The same is under Norton
> > Terminal Emulation. :)))
>
> Are
On Sat, Dec 05, 1998 at 08:19:13PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> April 1. The matter is that during dialing from minicom it performs kind
> of maping. So 1->9, 2->8, 3->7...9->1, 0->0. The same is under Norton
> Terminal Emulation. :)))
Are you using pulse dialling? Somewhere I read that there
Eugene Sevinian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that this modem is very special thing. Might be it was made at
> April 1. The matter is that during dialing from minicom it performs kind
> of maping. So 1->9, 2->8, 3->7...9->1, 0->0. The same is under Norton
> Terminal Emulation. :)))
Are y
Hello,
Eugene wrote:
> It seems that this modem is very special thing. Might be it was made at
> April 1. The matter is that during dialing from minicom it performs kind
> of maping. So 1->9, 2->8, 3->7...9->1, 0->0. The same is under Norton
> Terminal Emulation. :)))
It thinks it's in New Zealan
On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> It seems that this modem is very special thing. Might be it was made at
> April 1. The matter is that during dialing from minicom it performs kind
> of maping. So 1->9, 2->8, 3->7...9->1, 0->0. The same is under Norton
> Terminal Emulation. :)))
Ick...
On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Kent West wrote:
>
> Of course the next question is the obvious one: Is it a winmodem?
If it were a Winmodem, then it wouldnt even dial out.
> --
> Kent West
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> KC5ENO - Amateur Radio: When all else fails.
> Linux - Finally! A real OS for the Intel PC!
>
It seems that this modem is very special thing. Might be it was made at
April 1. The matter is that during dialing from minicom it performs kind
of maping. So 1->9, 2->8, 3->7...9->1, 0->0. The same is under Norton
Terminal Emulation. :)))
Eugene.
On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Kent West wrote:
> On Sat, 5
On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Shaleh wrote:
>
> >
> > On 04-Dec-98 Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Could someone explain my why the USR33600 modem which was working
> > > without any problem under w95 does not work under Debian. It simply
> > > pre
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Shaleh wrote:
>
> On 04-Dec-98 Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Could someone explain my why the USR33600 modem which was working
> > without any problem under w95 does not work under Debian. It simply
> > pretends that it works but dial absolutly wrong phone number :(
Eugene Sevinian writes:
> Could someone explain my why the USR33600 modem which was working without
> any problem under w95 does not work under Debian. It simply pretends that
> it works but dial absolutly wrong phone number
You mean that it dials a number different than the one you gave when you
On 04-Dec-98 Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> Hi all,
> Could someone explain my why the USR33600 modem which was working
> without any problem under w95 does not work under Debian. It simply
> pretends that it works but dial absolutly wrong phone number :(((.
> The only differens is that under w95 it
Hi all,
Could someone explain my why the USR33600 modem which was working
without any problem under w95 does not work under Debian. It simply
pretends that it works but dial absolutly wrong phone number :(((.
The only differens is that under w95 it was installed with explicitly
set port/irq. Ho
12 matches
Mail list logo
