On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I add users, they get this when they login:
>
> enterprise login: newuser
> Password:
> No directory, logging in with HOME=/
> No mail.
That is very strange. What command did you use to add the user? Check
*- On 19 Jul, Patrick Kirk wrote about "Re: Adding users - two quick questions"
> Thanks. I didn't even know there was a command adduser! Why is it better
> than useradd?
>
adduser is just a perl script that was written by Debian developers. It
ends up calling adduser a
Thanks!
Patrick
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 03:06:59PM +0100, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> >
> >
> > About the 'no home' ting: it means that the system couldn't cd to the
> user's
> > homedir after assuming the identity of the user. Usually this means
> > that /home isn't mounted, or wasn't mounted when you added the user,
Quoting Patrick Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> >
> > About the 'no home' ting: it means that the system couldn't cd to the
> user's
> > homedir after assuming the identity of the user. Usually this means
> > that /home isn't mounted, or wasn't mounted when you added the user, but
> > you may hav
Thanks. I didn't even know there was a command adduser! Why is it better
than useradd?
Patrick
Hm. usually the home directory is set up and
created in the adduser sequence.
You usually get something like:
home directory: (/home/$logname)
what you can do by hand is check your
"/etc/passwd" file and make sure the home directory
field
(ie the field before the shell path)
points to an existing
>
>
> About the 'no home' ting: it means that the system couldn't cd to the
user's
> homedir after assuming the identity of the user. Usually this means
> that /home isn't mounted, or wasn't mounted when you added the user, but
> you may have other reasons. Just make sure that the entry in /etc/
Quoting Patrick Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> When I add users, they get this when they login:
>
> enterprise login: newuser
> Password:
> No directory, logging in with HOME=/
> No mail.
>
> Why is no home directory available for them and how do I get the system to
> create default dir
About the 'no home' ting: it means that the system couldn't cd to the user's
homedir after assuming the identity of the user. Usually this means
that /home isn't mounted, or wasn't mounted when you added the user, but
you may have other reasons. Just make sure that the entry in /etc/passwd
for
Hi all,
When I add users, they get this when they login:
enterprise login: newuser
Password:
No directory, logging in with HOME=/
No mail.
Why is no home directory available for them and how do I get the system to
create default directories by appending the username to /home?
I need to be able
In a message dated 3/15/99 4:45:39 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Just curious - is there a doc that lists comparisons between GNOME and
KDE?
>
> Just to to dejanews and do a search under 'flame'. ;-)
>
LOL - Okay. I've picked myself up off the floor now. ;)
> S
In foo.debian-user, you wrote:
> Just curious - is there a doc that lists comparisons between GNOME and KDE?
Just to to dejanews and do a search under 'flame'. ;-)
Seriously, I don't know of any document that does that exactly, but
you can read one author's opinions at
http://linux.miningco.com/
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, David Densmore wrote:
> 1. Is Gnome a window manager for X, or is it a replacement for X?
>(or it it something else?)
It is something else. Gnome stands for GNU Network Object Model
Environment. It is (or will be when completed) a complete desktop based
on the GTK+ toolk
In a message dated 3/15/99 4:05:04 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Something else. You can use your existing WM with gnome.
> Gnome just provides libraries for applications and also several
> utility apps. The gnome-panel is an example of a utility app.
> Also, the gnome
1. Gnome is not a replacement for X, nor a Window Manager. You need both
X and a window manager (any one will work, but some, like WindowMaker or
Enlightenment, provides additional functionalities to work seamlessly
with gnome). Gnome is a desktop environment, that means that it provides
an integra
In foo.debian-user, you wrote:
> 1. Is Gnome a window manager for X, or is it a replacement for X?
>(or it it something else?)
Something else. You can use your existing WM with gnome.
Gnome just provides libraries for applications and also several
utility apps. The gnome-panel is an example
In a message dated 3/15/99 3:26:24 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> 1. Is Gnome a window manager for X, or is it a replacement for X?
> (or it it something else?)
>
Gnome is more of an object handling system than anything. I suppose you could
consider it a desktop envi
1. Is Gnome a window manager for X, or is it a replacement for X?
(or it it something else?)
2. What is the advantage of using a kernel source package in .deb
format as opposed to a generic kernel source in tar.gz format?
> How can I make setserial changes permanent. I'm using com 7 which is
> 0x3E8
> and irq 5. Irq 5 instead of irq 4 is a permanent change as far as my system
> goes but setserial reverts back to irq 4 at each reboot.
man setserial, the file you need to edit is
/etc/rc.boot/0setserial
Andrew
How can I make setserial changes permanent. I'm using com 7 which is 0x3E8
and irq 5. Irq 5 instead of irq 4 is a permanent change as far as my system
goes but setserial reverts back to irq 4 at each reboot.
Using winsock/netscape/windows 3.11 How can I be sure that *.deb files
down
21 matches
Mail list logo
