Re: Two Debian Release Cycle Issues

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:24:00PM -0500, Abdul Latip wrote: > * The Multiple Architecture Support Issue > > Each additional architecture support will significantly increase > the Debian release cycle, including security update, as well as > moving from "unstable" to "testing". I don't believe th

Re: Two Debian Release Cycle Issues

also sprach Abdul Latip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.0324 +0100]: > * The Essential Packages Issue > > I guess that there are a few essential/ very important packages. > (100?) compared with the whole set of Debian packages (1?). > However, the amount of packages (100 or 1) has very lit

Two Debian Release Cycle Issues

Hi, First of all, apology for my poor English. This following is *NOT* a complaint, but I would like to know if I have got the picture correctly in regard of the Debian release cycle (e.g. from Woody to Sarge). Please let my know the URL if this issue has been discussed before. * The Essential Pa