On Vi, 01 mai 20, 14:05:42, Dale Harris wrote:
>
> It was pretty much a fresh install from DVD. I did have some issues
> remounting the install DVD from the ILO, but otherwise it pretty normal
> install.
Was the system fully up-to-date before attempting to install wine32?
> It's working now.
T
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:54 PM Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>
> Apparently your system has received the security update for amd64, but
> not for i386.
>
> My guess is this the reason for the divergence between the amd64 and
> i386 on your system and you should look into it.
>
It was pretty much a fre
On Mi, 29 apr 20, 09:35:12, Dale Harris wrote:
>
> Okay, did some of that, the one that really blows up is libicu63:i386, when
> I try to install that it was to remove most of the amd64 packages.
>
> # apt-cache policy libicu63:i386
> libicu63:i386:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 63.1-6
>
On 2020-04-29 at 10:04, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:35 AM Dale Harris wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:54 AM The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> The basic procedure would be an iteration over adding the "will not be
>>> installed" packages (or, in the case of a remove-the-wrong-t
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:35 AM Dale Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:54 AM The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> The basic procedure would be an iteration over adding the "will not be
>> installed" packages (or, in the case of a remove-the-wrong-things
>> explosion, the important packages that woul
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:54 AM The Wanderer wrote:
>
> Random stabs in the direction of developing a usable set of steps to
> follow: since you suspect the system may have a problem with i386
> packages to begin with, it might be useful to know whether you actually
> have any already installed.
Sorry for the delayed response; I was responding in gaps mid-shift on
Monday, and then spent Tuesday actually in the office instead of working
remotely.
On 2020-04-27 at 15:05, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:29 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On initial examination, I see no meaning
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:29 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
> On initial examination, I see no meaningful issues in that output.
>
> Just to check: is the output of that 'apt-cache policy' command any
> different if you replace 'libwine' with 'libwine:i386'?
>
> If so, please pass along the output from
On 2020-04-27 at 14:14, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:21 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> What do you get from
>>
>> $ apt-cache show wine wine32:i386 libwine
>>
>> $ apt-cache policy libc6
>>
>> apt-cache policy $(apt-cache show libwine | grep Depends | sed 's/[:,]
>> /\n/g' | sed
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:21 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
>
> What do you get from
>
> $ apt-cache show wine wine32:i386 libwine
>
$ apt-cache policy libc6
>
> apt-cache policy $(apt-cache show libwine | grep Depends | sed 's/[:,]
> /\n/g' | sed 's/\([^ ]*\) .*$/\1/g' | grep -v Depends | sort -u )
>
On 2020-04-27 at 12:43, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:37 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> >> What do you get if you just try
>> >>
>> >> # apt-get install wine
>> >
>> > # apt install wine32
>
> The application I need to run requires the 32 bit version of wine, so if I
> can't get
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:37 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>
>
> >
> >> What do you get if you just try
> >>
> >> # apt-get install wine
> >
> > # apt install wine32
>
The application I need to run requires the 32 bit version of wine, so if I
can't get this installed, this will all become rather acade
Yes, I did do the apt update, several times.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:13 PM Klaus Singvogel
wrote:
> You didn't respond to the Mailinglist...
>
> Did you do an "apt-get update" etc. (as explained later) after adding it?
>
> Yesterday, when I did it as written, everything worked fine at my side.
You didn't respond to the Mailinglist...
Did you do an "apt-get update" etc. (as explained later) after adding it?
Yesterday, when I did it as written, everything worked fine at my side.
Regards,
Klaus.
Dale Harris wrote:
> Yeah, I did that.
>
> I have
>
> deb
> https://download.opens
On 2020-04-23 at 15:18, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:39 PM The Wanderer wrote:
>> (It does seem *really* odd to be getting Debian packages from an
>> OpenSUSE repository, but I have no specific reason to expect them to be
>> a problem.)
>
> I don't disagree.
FTR for the list'
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:39 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> (Is there a reason you replied off-list? This sort of thing is generally
> better handled in public, so that others can chime in if they have
> something to contribute.)
>
Sorry, user error.
(It does seem *really* odd to be getting Debian pa
Hi,
you'll need the libfaudio0 package, which is only avail at opensuse.org
https://wiki.winehq.org/Debian
For details about hotwo, look at the second point with an "!" from this site.
https://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=32192
Add the opensuse.org repo as suggested and install all at o
On 2020-04-23 at 13:11, Dale Harris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system where I have tried to install wine32 and the newer
> wine5 version, It can't resolve dependencies, like so:
>
> # apt install --install-recommends wine-stable
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading
Hi,
I have a system where I have tried to install wine32 and the newer wine5
version, It can't resolve dependencies, like so:
# apt install --install-recommends wine-stable
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installe
19 matches
Mail list logo
