Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread John Summerfield
Thomas Adam wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:46:08PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: Not on _my_ computers you won't. That's a completely unreliable way of restoring the directory. He's chrooting into a Debian install. Enough said. It works. Sometimes. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread John Summerfield
Stephen Tait wrote: At 15:46 26/08/2004, you wrote: Not on _my_ computers you won't. That's a completely unreliable way of restoring the directory. Why doesn't someone read the man page for cp? It tells you how not copy /proc. man cp Personally, I prefer tar ... | tar which seems to work far be

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread Thomas Adam
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:46:08PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > Not on _my_ computers you won't. That's a completely unreliable way of > restoring the directory. He's chrooting into a Debian install. Enough said. It works. -- Thomas Adam -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread Stephen Tait
At 15:46 26/08/2004, you wrote: Not on _my_ computers you won't. That's a completely unreliable way of restoring the directory. Why doesn't someone read the man page for cp? It tells you how not copy /proc. man cp Personally, I prefer tar ... | tar which seems to work far better for me than cp. m

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread John Summerfield
Thomas Adam wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:33:53PM +0100, Stephen Tait wrote: Gak! I've just thought. What do I do with all of the weird stuff in /proc and /dev? Will cp handle these things seamlessly, or will I have to create /proc and /dev are virtual. What you should therefore do is

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread Thomas Adam
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:33:53PM +0100, Stephen Tait wrote: > Gak! I've just thought. What do I do with all of the weird stuff in /proc > and /dev? Will cp handle these things seamlessly, or will I have to create /proc and /dev are virtual. What you should therefore do is omit these from you

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread Stephen Tait
At 15:00 26/08/2004, you wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Stephen Tait wrote: > Once all the files have done transferring, I'm guessing all I have to do is > do a chroot /mnt/newdrive /bin/bash, and then run the LILO thing to get > myself a boot block in my MBR. That'll do it. Als

Re: Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread Thomas Adam
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Stephen Tait wrote: > Once all the files have done transferring, I'm guessing all I have to do is > do a chroot /mnt/newdrive /bin/bash, and then run the LILO thing to get > myself a boot block in my MBR. That'll do it. Also make sure you change /etc/fs

Transferring install to another HD

2004-08-26 Thread Stephen Tait
Hi there, I just want to double check I'm going to be doing this right, or am at least on the right track. I've finally managed to make myself a kernel that'll boot directly offof my 3ware 9500 RAID card, but I had to make this on a regular PATA drive, since I need to be able to install straigh