On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 21:23, Darryl Barlow wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied to my Post on this topic. Though a Knoppix
> install may be the way to go in some circumstances, I will stick to the more
> tradititional installation.
>
> Darryl
> --
>
Just as a side note... I forgot I did t
Thanks to everyone who replied to my Post on this topic. Though a Knoppix
install may be the way to go in some circumstances, I will stick to the more
tradititional installation.
Darryl
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 09:57:08AM +, Lou Losee wrote:
> I installed via Knoppix. Things went smoothly and I have had no
> problems with the apt-get upgrade process.
>
> However
>
> There are *situations* to think about:
> - By default the install goes into a single partition. There ar
A friend of mine (newbie) installed Debian by way of knoppix. I didn't
know about knoppix so I basically thought that he screwed up BIG TIME on
his install. I could not figure why on earth he'd need a logical volume
manager, why did he install everything under a single partition, why did
his vfat p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 06:29:42PM +1000, Darryl Barlow wrote:
> However, is there any
> disadvantage to installing knoppix and then using dist-upgrade?
The only version you will able to do that with is sid.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PR
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 08:52:49 -0500
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darryl Barlow wrote:
>
> >I plan to install Debian unstable on another machine. Whenever I
> >have done this in the past I have started with a Woody install from
> >cd followed by apt-get dist-upgrade which of course works
watching the list for responses, but you say that this has worked in
> > the past for you.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Hershel Robinson
> > Jerusalem, Israel
> >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: Darryl Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &g
Darryl Barlow wrote:
I plan to install Debian unstable on another machine. Whenever I have done
this in the past I have started with a Woody install from cd followed by
apt-get dist-upgrade which of course works well. However, is there any
disadvantage to installing knoppix and then using dis
you,
> Hershel Robinson
> Jerusalem, Israel
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Darryl Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sun, August 17, 2003 4:30
> > To: debian users
> > Subject: Traditional Install or Knoppix?
> >
> >
> > I plan
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 06:29:42PM +1000, Darryl Barlow wrote:
> I plan to install Debian unstable on another machine. Whenever I have done
> this in the past I have started with a Woody install from cd followed by
> apt-get dist-upgrade which of course works well. However, is there any
> disa
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 04:15, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> Darryl Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > is there any disadvantage to installing knoppix and then using
> > dist-upgrade?
>
> KNOPPIX is a wonderful system and it's hardware recognition can
> help installation a lot.
>
> But: it's a mi
Darryl Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is there any disadvantage to installing knoppix and then using
> dist-upgrade?
KNOPPIX is a wonderful system and it's hardware recognition can
help installation a lot.
But: it's a mix from stable/testing/unstable and upgrading from it
will be difficult
I plan to install Debian unstable on another machine. Whenever I have done
this in the past I have started with a Woody install from cd followed by
apt-get dist-upgrade which of course works well. However, is there any
disadvantage to installing knoppix and then using dist-upgrade? Might save
13 matches
Mail list logo
