On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM, wrote:
> 1)
> I have a hard disk (1Tb, the bigger) which gave me many errors when I am
> trying to read it. It makes it very slow to even read, but I've been able to
> determine that it contains jpg images with a classic file browser. I did not
> managed to copy
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:53:01PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> >This will be a problem, as you should first image the disk(s) and
> >work from the images, not the physical disk. It is especially
> >important for the disk throwing errors, every read attempt may worsen
> >it's condi
On Friday 28 December 2012 18:26:08 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> PS: I am not recommending to mount nor work on the original data disk.
Several people have said that Osamu, including me - even if less eruditely
than you. But the difficulty is that the problem disk does not belong to the
OP, but to a fri
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:23:47PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
...
> PS: Even if you make a backup first, by all means mount the drive or
> partition read only, before you access it.
Hmmm... Maybe I was too short on explanation.
The best practice is "NOT TO MOUNT AT ALL".
If your desktop sys
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:45:20 +0900
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
> > wrote:
> > > > I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
> > > >
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
On 27/12/12 18:17, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain "my" (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two
problems (from different peoples).
===
0) the common p
I only can repeat, that the OP by all means should mount the drive
read
only.
Mounting with -ro sounds wiser to me, I think you are true.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: h
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 21:35 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:17:56PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
> > deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
> ...
> > (2), I've more hop
This will be a problem, as you should first image the disk(s) and
work from the images, not the physical disk. It is especially
important for the disk throwing errors, every read attempt may worsen
it's condition. Use tools like (g)ddrescue to make a copy despite
read
errors.
I know, and am ab
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > > I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
> > > http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
> > >
> > > But I
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:17:56PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
> deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
...
> (2), I've more hopes, IF the user stopped the destructive process
> before the disk w
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 13:19 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > > I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
> > > http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
> > >
> > > But I have no pers
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
> > http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
> >
> > But I have no personal experience of it. The advice is always to
> > copy the
> > dri
I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
But I have no personal experience of it. The advice is always to
copy the
drive that needs rescuing to another drive, and work on the copy, not
the
orginal. Again, I have not
On 27/12/2012 22:17, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and deleted
partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain "my" (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems
(from different peoples).
===
0) the common pa
On Thursday 27 December 2012 21:17:56 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
> deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
>
> Let me explain "my" (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems
> (from different peoples
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain "my" (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems
(from different peoples).
===
0) the common part.
By the past, I've did some researches about forensic
17 matches
Mail list logo
