On 11 November 2010 14:23, B. Alexander wrote:
> If you are running Linux-on-Linux, you might consider either vserver
> or openvz. It does virtual containers similar to Sunacle Solaris'
or Xen hypervisor
www.xen.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Dave is correct. I have researched this long and hard, since I don't
particularly like vmware because they only seem to pay lip-service to
Linux. So I have researched a lot of the virtualization platforms for
Linux.
KVM needs a 64-bit cpu, but it also, as Dave said, needs the VTX
instruction set (
I think that the virtualization support in some CPUs is not compatible
with KVM. I have an HP server with two dual-core Xeon model 5160 CPUs
in it. According to Intel's website, this CPU has the VT-x extension
for virtualization support, and I enabled virtualization support in the
BIOS. Howe
2010/11/11 David Baron
>
> I have a dual core intel processor with hyperthreading, etc.
> Virtualization options are set on in BIOS.
>
> I still get something like "CPU does not have extensions, doing nothing" when
> the KVM driver tries to load.
>
> I am using a stock 2.6.32 kernel from Sid.
>
>
I have a dual core intel processor with hyperthreading, etc.
Virtualization options are set on in BIOS.
I still get something like "CPU does not have extensions, doing nothing" when
the KVM driver tries to load.
I am using a stock 2.6.32 kernel from Sid.
How do I activate KVM stuff? Need to com
5 matches
Mail list logo
