At 05:01 PM 5/6/1999 -0400, Mitch Blevins wrote:
>In foo.debian-user, you wrote:
>> Somewhat off-topic, but perhaps applicable
>>
>> If a modem is a device for MOdulating/DEModulation,
>> and a "winmodem" turns that job over to the software (Windows),
>> is that not grounds for a class-action
In foo.debian-user, you wrote:
> Somewhat off-topic, but perhaps applicable
>
> If a modem is a device for MOdulating/DEModulation,
> and a "winmodem" turns that job over to the software (Windows),
> is that not grounds for a class-action fraud suit against winmodem
> manufacturers for marketi
Somewhat off-topic, but perhaps applicable
If a modem is a device for MOdulating/DEModulation,
and a "winmodem" turns that job over to the software (Windows),
is that not grounds for a class-action fraud suit against winmodem
manufacturers for marketing them as modems (modulator/demodulators)?
3 matches
Mail list logo
