Re: The state of IPSec in Debian

2019-10-24 Thread Ralph Aichinger
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:01:25PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > StrongSwan used to be the best supported, but LibreSwan is now. > Things change. Thanks! This is the kind of information I was hoping for. > If you need solid VPN support and control all the endpoints, > Wireguard may be an even bette

Re: The state of IPSec in Debian

2019-10-24 Thread Dan Ritter
Ralph Aichinger wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:32:51PM +0200, deb...@jherrero.org wrote: > > El jue, 24-10-2019 a las 16:27 +0200, Ralph Aichinger escribió: > > > Or am I completely wrong and should I use some other implementation? > > > > from > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable

Re: The state of IPSec in Debian

2019-10-24 Thread Ralph Aichinger
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:32:51PM +0200, deb...@jherrero.org wrote: > El jue, 24-10-2019 a las 16:27 +0200, Ralph Aichinger escribió: > > Or am I completely wrong and should I use some other implementation? > > from > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en

Re: The state of IPSec in Debian

2019-10-24 Thread debian
El jue, 24-10-2019 a las 16:27 +0200, Ralph Aichinger escribió: > Or am I completely wrong and should I use some other implementation? from https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#noteworthy-obsolete-packages --8<- ipsec-tools and rac

The state of IPSec in Debian

2019-10-24 Thread Ralph Aichinger
Hi! I am not a completely unexperienced user of Debian, but sometimes certain subsystems and choices still puzzle me. Right now this is IPSec. There used to be several implementations, but am I right that the only sensible one right now is Strongswan? https://wiki.debian.org/IPsec goes on about