ect: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
>> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>>
>>
>> Hi, my case was similar, while in Debian I use just
>> /etc/network/interfaces
>> file or NM, in a Dell laptop with Arch I was using W
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 14:11:51 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> On 9/30/21, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
> >> From: to...@de
> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> > What baffels me is though, at what
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 19:33:45 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > At least that's how I learn.
> > >
> >
> > That is not me.
>
> People tend
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> No apology necessary.
OK, thanks.
> I know I am opinionated and right in your
> face (and a reverse snob as my wife regularly points out).
> But I am also a big boy, I can take it if you yell back at me.
Still I try hard
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 15:55:54 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> > From: "David Wright"
> > > [Security]
> > > PreSharedKey=a long string of alphanumeric characters
> > > Passphrase=aquickbrownfoxjumpsoverthelazydog
> >
> > I take it that you edi
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 16:09:44 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> >
> > Might I suggest wicd, which people here do have experience with
> > and have used successfully?
> >
> Before writing this reply, I checked with packages.d
On 9/30/21, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Tomas
>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
>> From: to...@de
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
>> Connection status show OK
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 12:23:45 -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use th
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 07:33:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > At least that's how I learn.
> > >
> >
> > That is not me.
>
> People te
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > At least that's how I learn.
> >
>
> That is not me.
People tend to be different. That makes things... interesting.
> I will not encourage anyone to
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 12:28:54 PM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Your statement: "Be bold, go where no man has gone before"
>
> I suppose that "man" refers to both men and women, right? (Just kidding. In
> this time and age, one has to be seen to be politically correct, yes?)
Yes, or at least
Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> > On Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:54:17 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Yes, their email address are displayed on the project's website.
> > No, they didn't mention that any Tom, Dick a
k (Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> >
> > Try
> >
> > ip link show
> >
> > and look for the name of a device which could be your wifi NIC.
> >
> Nope, ip link show does not show up any device which is m
Hi
Thanks for your words of encouragement.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:39 PM
> From: rhkra...@gmail.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:48:19PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use the
> > default
> > methods to connect via wifi. Especially when they showe
Hi Tomas
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:48 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 202
Hi Dan
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 11:15 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to su
network (Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> >
> > That depends. How did you get their e-mail address?
> > Was it from the project webpage? Do they encourage anybody to
> > send them direct mail?
> > Them yes.
> >
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:14:05AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> What baffels me is though, at what length someone would go to not use the
> default
> methods to connect via wifi. Especially when they showed limited experience
> in networking in the first place.
This remark was, IMO,
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 10:54:17 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Yes, their email address are displayed on the project's website.
>
> No, they didn't mention that any Tom, Dick and Harry are welcome to write
> to them.
Well, thank goodness your name is Stella ;-) (Sorry!)
I think the impl
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Oh dear! Oh dear!
>
> After a reboot, I typed the following word at the command prompt:
>
> iwctl
>
> Next, I typed
>
> station wlan0 show
>
> The output was: No device found
Try
ip link show
and look for the name of a device which could be your wifi NIC.
-dsr-
Hi Henning
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM
> From: "Henning Follmann"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> Tha
Oh dear! Oh dear!
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> >
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 09:19:45 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Do you think any one of them will reply to my email? It's a long shot, I
> know.
You don't have much to lose by sending an email. If it would require a long
email that would take you a fair amount of time to write, you might wr
; > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> > I don't know about iwd specifically, but given address and
> > netmask it should be able to reasonably infer a default
> > broadcast. So I'd say "yes, but ask iwd" ;-)
> >
> Someho
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 6:06 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Conn
Hola David
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:22 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> So t
Hi David
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 1:25 PM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
>
> Err,
Hi
Thanks for sharing your experience with me.
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM
> From: "riveravaldez"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to s
Hi
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM
> From: to...@tuxteam.de
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> I don't know about i
On 9/30/21, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 18:06:12 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
>
>> [ … ] However, while I know a fair amount about
>> networking, I don't know anything about iwd.
>>
>> Very few people here have experience with iwd. It does not yet
>> seem to be working for you.
>>
>>
bject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> > Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > > Hi Dan
> > >
> > > Setting static IP address in network configuration
> > > Add
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 18:06:12 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> [ … ] However, while I know a fair amount about
> networking, I don't know anything about iwd.
>
> Very few people here have experience with iwd. It does not yet
> seem to be working for you.
>
> Might I suggest wicd, which people here
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 15:18:44 (+0200), Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM
> > From: "Dan Ritter"
> >
> > Try
> >
> > sudo dhclient wlan0
> >
> > and see if that gives you an IP and a default route, at which
> > point apt update should work.
> >
>
> I tried
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:04:21 +0200
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> What is the exact location of .emacs file?
~/.emacs
In case you don't speak fluent Unix, the tilde (~) expands to the
user's home directory. So that is a shorthand way of saying,
$HOME/.emacs
"Dot files", files with a leading dot, ar
etwork (Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> > Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > > Hi Dan
> > >
> > > Setting static IP address in network configuration
> > > Add the following section to /var/lib/iwd/netw
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:36 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> [.}
>
> It
Hi Dan
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 3:09 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but u
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:36:29PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Debian doesn't use "iwd" (whatever that is) to configure network
> interfaces. Whatever created this file, it's not being used.
That statement is incorrect.
Even then "Debian" actually means "an OS installation", iwd is
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:09:55PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > [IPv4]
> > Address=192.168.1.10
> > Netmask=255.255.255.0
> > Gateway=192.168.1.1
> > Broadcast=192.168.1.255
> > DNS=192.168.1.1
> >
> > In the above example the broadcast IP is 192.168.1.255.
> >
> > Quest
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> Setting static IP address in network configuration
> Add the following section to /var/lib/iwd/network.type file. For example:
>
> /var/lib/iwd/spaceship.psk
> [IPv4]
> Address=192.168.1.10
> Netmask=255.255.255.0
> Gateway=192.168.1.1
> Broadcast=192.168.1.25
Hi Dan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 10:08 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but un
etwork (Part 1 -
> > Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
> >
> >
> > If that's correct configuration for iwd,
>
> What did you mean by "correct configuration"? I based my .psk file on the
> sample provided by ArchLinux's wi
Hi Dan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 9:30 PM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> May I refer you to the sub-section titled "Setting static IP address in
> network configuration" of ArchLinux' wiki on iwd
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd).
>
> My file whitecollar.psk located in /var/lib/iwd/ has the foll
Hi Dan
Thanks for your reply.
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM
> From: "Dan Ritter"
> To: "Stella Ashburne"
> Cc: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: iwd: Using iwd to connect to a wireless network (Part 1 -
> Conn
rk (Part 1 -
> Connection status show OK but unable to surf the net)
>
> Have you got:
> (setq gnutls-algorithm-priority "NORMAL:-VERS-TLS1.3")
> in your .emacs file? The internet broke for emacs a while ago and this
> line fixed that problem. It may also have done some other things as well.
>
>
What is the exact location of .emacs file?
Have you got:
(setq gnutls-algorithm-priority "NORMAL:-VERS-TLS1.3")
in your .emacs file? The internet broke for emacs a while ago and this
line fixed that problem. It may also have done some other things as well.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Stella Ashburne wrote:
> > Based on Arc
Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Based on ArchLinux's tutorial on using iwd to connect to a wireless network
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), I managed to connect to my wireless
> routeror so I thought :(
>
> Below are the relevant outputs:
>
> Station: wl
Based on ArchLinux's tutorial on using iwd to connect to a wireless network
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iwd), I managed to connect to my wireless
routeror so I thought :(
Below are the relevant outputs:
In Terminal #1
username@hostname:~$ iwctl
[iwd]# device wlan0 show
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:33:12 -0500 David Wright
wrote:
> [Big Snip]
> > > None of which ever worked 100% because the web pages all seemed
> > > to be using a different version. The "it works here" syndrome,
> > > essentially the same as the N.I.H. beliefs. :(
> >
> > Well, I'm glad flash is dyi
On Sun 23 Apr 2017 at 15:42:35 (-0700), Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:41:30 -0400 Gene Heskett
> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 23 April 2017 15:15:05 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 22 April 2
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:41:30 -0400 Gene Heskett
wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2017 15:15:05 Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene
On Sunday 23 April 2017 15:15:05 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett
>
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Went to newegg.com to look for s
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:21:28 -0400 Gene Heskett
wrote:
> On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front
> > > page, while I think its alive, d
On Sunday 23 April 2017 07:35:36 Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote:
> >> Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett:
> >>> And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site
> >>> doesn't show me anything n
On 2017-04-23, Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> I usually look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, but the plugin file there
> may actually be a symlink pointing to something in /etc/alternatives,
> which in turn will probably point to some other item somewhere in
> /usr/lib...
To cover all the bases, I hav
Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett:
On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote:
Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett:
And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't
show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff.
Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/soft
On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote:
> Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett:
> > And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't
> > show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff.
>
> Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and
> https://get
On 2017-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote:
What I do is check periodically for updates and when there is one, I
open the tar.gz archive from Adobe in Firefox, extract the
libflashplayer.so file into my home directory, and copy it over the
obsolete libflashplayer.so files on my machine.
> And how do you
On 23/04/17 16:21, Gene Heskett wrote:
And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show
me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff.
flashplugin-nonfree is often broken. Here is my workaround:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/03/msg00491.html
See also:
https
Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett:
And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show
me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff.
Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and
https://get.adobe.com/nl/flashplayer/ definitely show 25.0.0.148 for
On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett
>
> wrote:
> > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front
> > page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on
> > any product link. I hope its not con
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett
wrote:
> Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page,
> while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any
> product link. I hope its not contagious.
>
> Many news sites are saying "request entity too large"
On Saturday 22 April 2017 17:20:00 songbird wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front
> > page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on
> > any product link. I hope its not contagious.
> >
> > Many news sites are saying "r
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page,
> while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any product
> link. I hope its not contagious.
>
> Many news sites are saying "request entity too large" also.
i've not seen any problems (
Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page,
while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any product
link. I hope its not contagious.
Many news sites are saying "request entity too large" also.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used i
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 14:11 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 05/30/11 at 11:34am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > Do I need to download and install pppoeconf + dependencies or is there
> > > > another way to get a PPPoE connection?
>
> > > Debian packages are binaries, because Debian is a binary dis
On 05/30/11 at 11:34am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Do I need to download and install pppoeconf + dependencies or is there
> > > another way to get a PPPoE connection?
> > Debian packages are binaries, because Debian is a binary distribution.
> > So there is no 'make' component to installation.
> >
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 02:17 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 05/30/11 at 01:03am, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > On 5/29/2011 6:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > > Do I need to download and install pppoeconf + dependencies or is there
> > > another way to get a PPPoE connection?
> >
> > You buy a ch
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 00:56 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> Sounds like you solved your issue.. Is there something you need?
Hi William :)
regarding to GRUB2 I don't need help.
> If you used the CD as you said and installed, you already have Debian stable.
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding your q
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 01:03 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 5/29/2011 6:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Do I need to download and install pppoeconf + dependencies or is there
> > another way to get a PPPoE connection?
>
> You buy a cheap consumer router, like everyone else does who isn't
> prov
On 05/30/11 at 01:03am, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 5/29/2011 6:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Do I need to download and install pppoeconf + dependencies or is there
> > another way to get a PPPoE connection?
>
> You buy a cheap consumer router, like everyone else does who isn't
> provided one by
On 5/29/2011 6:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Do I need to download and install pppoeconf + dependencies or is there
> another way to get a PPPoE connection?
You buy a cheap consumer router, like everyone else does who isn't
provided one by their ISP. For instance:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/P
On 05/30/11 at 01:00am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I'm new to this list. I'm a long time Linux only user, interested in
> audio and MIDI. Regarding to several issues with distros I did use, e.g.
> coercion to use PulseAudio, I like to switch the distro.
Great! Welcome.
>
> At the moment I'v
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 01:00 +0200, I wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I'm new to this list. I'm a long time Linux only user, interested in
> audio and MIDI. Regarding to several issues with distros I did use, e.g.
> coercion to use PulseAudio, I like to switch the distro.
>
> At the moment I've got Suse 11.2 6
Hi :)
I'm new to this list. I'm a long time Linux only user, interested in
audio and MIDI. Regarding to several issues with distros I did use, e.g.
coercion to use PulseAudio, I like to switch the distro.
At the moment I've got Suse 11.2 64-bit, used to run e.g. proprietary
lightscribe apps, that
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>
> To check to see if this is the problem install wireshark, if you don't
> already have it installed, and do a packet capture when trying to surf to an
> external
> website. If you have dns queries going to 224.xxx.xxx.xxx avahi-daemon/mdns
> is the
> culprit.
Hi Fredd
On Sat,09.May.09, 17:52:16, Giancarlo Pegoraro wrote:
> I'm sorry, I remember no more of two (2) nameserver in
> the /etc/resolv.conf, but I'm not sure :-)
The manpage (resolv.conf(5)) says 3.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einste
e resolve, but
firefox, aMSN, skype, emphaty didn't connect/surf on the web.
This layout was working very well. Since may, 7, at night, dind't work any more.
Here is some information:
Debian testing kernel 2.6.29-1-686
At work, from eth0, I surf on the net very well.
:~$ cat /etc/res
Hi,
Il giorno sab, 09/05/2009 alle 10.07 -0300, Marcelo Laia ha scritto:
-cut--
> Debian testing kernel 2.6.29-1-686
>
> At work, from eth0, I surf on the net very well.
>
> :~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
> nameserver 200.221.1
fox, aMSN, skype, emphaty didn't connect/surf on the web.
This layout was working very well. Since may, 7, at night, dind't work any more.
Here is some information:
Debian testing kernel 2.6.29-1-686
At work, from eth0, I surf on the net very well.
:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 200.22
2006/12/6, Mike Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
sorry, I meant yes, I was a member of pid group as myslf and root.
don't worry...^__^
do you have create a policy for your group to connect internet in the
firewall with iptables?
I apologize if I ask things that seems stupid, but I need to know a
2006/12/5, Mike Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
kppp won't load as user but will as root, even so won't connect.
Ndiswrapper is loaded, states it is connected to lan but will not
connect to net. Anyone have any ideas? It is driving me crazy. A
few weeks ago etch was wo
Hi,
kppp won't load as user but will as root, even so won't connect.
Ndiswrapper is loaded, states it is connected to lan but will not
connect to net. Anyone have any ideas? It is driving me crazy. A
few weeks ago etch was working on the net. Ndiswrapper fine, kppp
worked in roo
Hi,
kppp won't load as user but will as root, even so won't connect.
Ndiswrapper is loaded, states it is connected to lan but will not
connect to net. Anyone have any ideas? It is driving me crazy. A
few weeks ago etch was working on the net. Ndiswrapper fine, kppp
worked in roo
Hi,
kppp won't load as user but will as root, even so won't connect.
Ndiswrapper is loaded, states it is connected to lan but will not
connect to net. Anyone have any ideas? It is driving me crazy. A
few weeks ago etch was working on the net. Ndiswrapper fine, kppp
worked in roo
Hi,
kppp won't load as user but will as root, even so won't connect.
Ndiswrapper is loaded, states it is connected to lan but will not
connect to net. Anyone have any ideas? It is driving me crazy. A
few weeks ago etch was working on the net. Ndiswrapper fine, kppp
worked in roo
A very simple way of doing this is using iproute2.
First you need to know what ports (tcp or udp) uses each of your applications.
Then, using iptables "mark" the traffic (mangle) for each application,
for example:
Mark with label "A" traffic of emule and bittorrent.
Mark with label "B" the rest of
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:38:25AM +0200, Jabka Atu wrote:
> hello ...
> i have two types of connections :
> Lan : 1.5mbps /512kbps
> Wifi : (for free) 30kps /30kbps
>
> i'd to use both of them one for for havy downloads as for bittorent and
> ftp(azureus , wget , ssh) and all other by wifi(FF
hello ...
i have two types of connections :
Lan : 1.5mbps /512kbps
Wifi : (for free) 30kps /30kbps
i'd to use both of them one for for havy downloads as for bittorent and
ftp(azureus , wget , ssh) and all other by wifi(FF,gaim,.
how can it be done ?
Debian testing
Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2005 22:29 schrieb Keith Edmunds:
> Ibrahim Mubarak wrote:
> > Any thoughts? Any docs talking about a similar issue?
>
> Use separate machines, host the data under Linux and make available
> to the Windows system via Samba.
And if he decides to to use linux for this file? smbfs
Am 2005-05-22 13:26:14, schrieb Ibrahim Mubarak:
> Hi all,
>
> I am in a bit of weird situation. I am running a dual boot system. I
> need to be able to let someone I know but lives far be able to upload
> 30 GB or so of data to my PC or download stuff off of it. I also need
> to be able to get it
Am 22.05.2005 um 13:26 schrieb Ibrahim Mubarak:
> I am in a bit of weird situation. I am running a dual boot system. I
> need to be able to let someone I know but lives far be able to upload
> 30 GB or so of data to my PC or download stuff off of it. I also need
> to be able to get it all to the w
On Sunday May 22 2005 22:26, Ibrahim Mubarak wrote:
> The only way I can share files between the OSs is through FAT32 disks.
> But those only support files up to 4GB. So I'm in trouble.
You could try a tool like EXT2IFS to access you Linux partitions from Windows:
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Marty wrote:
> Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:43:49 -0400
> From: Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian User List
> Subject: Re: Is there a way to get 30 GB files through the net ...
> Resent-Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 15:43:57 -0500 (CDT)
> Resent-From: debi
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Marty wrote:
> Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:43:49 -0400
> From: Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian User List
> Subject: Re: Is there a way to get 30 GB files through the net ...
> Resent-Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 15:43:57 -0500 (CDT)
> Resent-From: debi
Ibrahim Mubarak wrote:
Hi all,
I am in a bit of weird situation. I am running a dual boot system. I
need to be able to let someone I know but lives far be able to upload
30 GB or so of data to my PC or download stuff off of it. I also need
to be able to get it all to the windows side. Yeah, I kn
Ibrahim Mubarak wrote:
Any thoughts? Any docs talking about a similar issue?
Use separate machines, host the data under Linux and make available to
the Windows system via Samba.
--
Keith Edmunds
+-+
| Tiger Computing Ltd
Hi all,
I am in a bit of weird situation. I am running a dual boot system. I
need to be able to let someone I know but lives far be able to upload
30 GB or so of data to my PC or download stuff off of it. I also need
to be able to get it all to the windows side. Yeah, I know you don't
like win, bu
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
