Hi,
Thank you, David, for all the information.
Scanning all these DOT files and checking what sort of documentation user/admin
can easily get for them are steps in my process.
I already started checking about the .SEQ file you cited for instance.
Debian Code Search is very helpful.
On the other si
On Sun 16 May 2021 at 20:30:03 (+0200), Patrice Duroux wrote:
>
> 2. After this I was curious about the overall content of all the packages
> on any dot files (including directories). For that I used the following to
> 2 commands:
> # the packages concerned
> apt-file --filter-origins Debian --reg
If you were root and did ls -a /etc/.pwd.lock you'd probably find it.
On Sun, 16 May 2021, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. I was wondering about the presence of the /etc/.pwd.lock file on my
> system.
> For sure 'apt-file search /etc/.pwd.lock' is no help, but 'man -K
> .pwd.lock' do.
> I also
Hi,
1. I was wondering about the presence of the /etc/.pwd.lock file on my
system.
For sure 'apt-file search /etc/.pwd.lock' is no help, but 'man -K
.pwd.lock' do.
I also searched the Debian user mailing list and found some relevant
discussion on this file.
Querying the Debian Code Search was also
I actually got a response from the band's management, which is
impressive in today's musical climate...
> Hi Antony,
>
> You are quite correct that Justin - and the rest of the band - were
> unhappy
> about the situation and after lobbying the record label it was removed.
> All
> copies in the sho
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:30:42PM +0100, Philippe Marzouk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:07:23PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 31 December 2003 11:58, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > > > The back label mentions "
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:07:23PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 December 2003 11:58, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > > The back label mentions "digital copy protection", which I find
> > > rather worrying...
> >
> > T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:08:00AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> IIRC, if it does contain the DREADED DRM, it is suppose to contain some
> non-music data on the first track, thus this may be the thing that can't
> be gotten past.
CD DRM is usually accomp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:47:23PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> I take it yours doesn't have a banner on the back of the case with any
> small print about copy protection?
Nope, it does not. It is *very* important you take a stand: Just take
the CD
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:58:54AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been trying to rip "Permission To Land" by The Darkness to ogg
> using grip (and cdparanoia).
>
> cdparanoia has tremendous problems with the disc, which plays ok in a CD
> play
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:01:09AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:58:54AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > cdparanoia has tremendous problems with the disc, which plays ok in a CD
> > player. If anyone out there has it, can they have a go at ripping it?
> > The back label
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to rip "Permission To Land" by The Darkness to ogg
using grip (and cdparanoia).
cdparanoia has tremendous problems with the disc, which plays ok in a CD
player. If anyone out there has it, can they have a go at ripping it?
The back
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:01:09AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:58:54AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > cdparanoia has tremendous problems with the disc, which plays ok in a CD
> > player. If anyone out there has it, can they have a go at ripping it?
> > The back label
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:58:54AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> cdparanoia has tremendous problems with the disc, which plays ok in a CD
> player. If anyone out there has it, can they have a go at ripping it?
> The back label mentions "digital copy
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 December 2003 11:58, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > The back label mentions "digital copy protection", which I find
> > rather worrying...
>
> Then, I would say, return the (C)D to the artist with a long letter
> explai
On Wednesday 31 December 2003 11:58, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> The back label mentions "digital copy protection", which I find
> rather worrying...
Then, I would say, return the (C)D to the artist with a long letter
explaining why this approach is fundamentally flawed, and can only work
by control
Hi all,
I've been trying to rip "Permission To Land" by The Darkness to ogg
using grip (and cdparanoia).
cdparanoia has tremendous problems with the disc, which plays ok in a CD
player. If anyone out there has it, can they have a go at ripping it?
The back label mention
17 matches
Mail list logo
