On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 07:44:55PM -0500, dircha wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
> >On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:51:16PM -0500, dircha wrote:
> >The case for (b) is inaccurate... the filesystem *will* be readable
> >under Windoze, but will contain a whole bunch of files and directories
> >as opposed to a sing
Pigeon wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:51:16PM -0500, dircha wrote:
The case for (b) is inaccurate... the filesystem *will* be readable
under Windoze, but will contain a whole bunch of files and directories
as opposed to a single file called something.iso.
I'm betting it's (a), and all you need t
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:51:16PM -0500, dircha wrote:
> Howard Levine wrote:
> >I have learned that the CD that I had burnt at the public library is
> >an ".iso" image and is unusable, whereas I could have programmed NERO
> >to reinterpret the image when it was created. Is the ISObuster
> >utili
Howard Levine wrote:
I have learned that the CD that I had burnt at the public library is
an ".iso" image and is unusable, whereas I could have programmed NERO
to reinterpret the image when it was created. Is the ISObuster
utility proper to make this usable or must I download again?
Welcome.
Perha
I'm pleased that my confirmation was successful. I feel too inundated with seventy-something e-mails, but it gives me every apprehension that I shall find all that I seek.
I'm a novice, hobbyist, and beginner to LINUX and the internet. The open license project struck a pleasing chord. It is th
5 matches
Mail list logo