Yes, I saw the DKIM=fail at the first time, but debian said, it is the fault
of megamailservers.eu and theire servers are ok.
So I contacted megamailservers.eu today, but generally I can do nothing else
myself, as I am no admin of any involved mailservers.
So, hopefully they will answer.
IMO
This ypou received NOT from the list was my fault - forgot to add the address
in the To: field. Sorry
Hans
> ...and the second copy which I received *not* via the list (which I'm
> assuming, but haven't verified, was sent by BCC or similar rather than
> being a separate unique mail), which I did
On 2024-07-04 at 16:10, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2024-07-04 at 16:07, Hans wrote:
>
>> Surprisingly Testmail_2 appeared WITHOUT the SPAM tag.
>>
>> This one is a reply of a mail from The Wanderer.
>>
>> I expect it WITH the SPAM tag from the debian list.
>
> This one showed up on my end with
On 2024-07-04 at 16:07, Hans wrote:
> Surprisingly Testmail_2 appeared WITHOUT the SPAM tag.
>
> This one is a reply of a mail from The Wanderer.
>
> I expect it WITH the SPAM tag from the debian list.
This one showed up on my end with dkim=fail in the usual header.
--
The Wanderer
The
Surprisingly Testmail_2 appeared WITHOUT the SPAM tag.
This one is a reply of a mail from The Wanderer.
I expect it WITH the SPAM tag from the debian list.
Hans
5 matches
Mail list logo
