Hello,
On Jul 24, 9:30 am, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Write a small do-nothing program that lets me test the USR & HUP
> signals. Make it simple enough that a poor C programmer can
> understand it. I'll compile and run it, then send you the results.
Thank you. Here is the basic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/07 01:39, Matthias wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> But that means that Debian Developers are the way that "Linux" (the
>> kernel? libc?, something else?) are deeply changing The Way Unix Works.
>>
>> And I just don't believe they'd do that. For one th
Hello,
> But that means that Debian Developers are the way that "Linux" (the
> kernel? libc?, something else?) are deeply changing The Way Unix Works.
>
> And I just don't believe they'd do that. For one thing, they're all
> pretty busy, and making such deep changes to every new version of
> ups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/07 23:04, Matthias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 23, 3:30 pm, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> The issue is not with debian iteself, but rather my implementation of
>>> signal handling. My feeling is that in trying to write code fo
Hello,
On Jul 23, 3:30 pm, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The issue is not with debian iteself, but rather my implementation of
> > signal handling. My feeling is that in trying to write code for a
> > large cross-section (debian, BSD, GNU), I missed something that debian
>
> GNU? H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/07 14:04, Matthias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 23, 6:10 am, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> this. The biggest issue seems to be in signal handling. I have been
>>> told that certain version of Debian do not respond to the USR a
Hello,
On Jul 23, 6:10 am, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this. The biggest issue seems to be in signal handling. I have been
> > told that certain version of Debian do not respond to the USR and HUP
> > sugnals.
>
> What do you mean by "Debian" doesn't respond to signals? A lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/07 00:00, Mar Matthias Darin wrote:
[snip]
> this. The biggest issue seems to be in signal handling. I have been
> told that certain version of Debian do not respond to the USR and HUP
> sugnals.
What do you mean by "Debian" doesn't respond
Hello,
On Jul 23, 2:20 am, steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> quite interesting! but: what does this program add to spamassassin?
spamassassin, like dspam, can use the X-DynaStop tag to train on
spam. Spam Zombies are by far the largest group in the Dynamic IP
address range (approx 75%+), wher
Mar Matthias Darin wrote:
Hello,
Please forgive me if this is an inappropriate area for this request.
I have written an anti-spam tool for linux called DynaStop. It works
with Exim and procmail on the limited number of versions I have
tested, but I am having trouble verifyng its operations on De
Hello,
Please forgive me if this is an inappropriate area for this request.
I have written an anti-spam tool for linux called DynaStop. It works
with Exim and procmail on the limited number of versions I have
tested, but I am having trouble verifyng its operations on Debian.
I've have multipl
11 matches
Mail list logo
