also sprach Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.23.1656 +0200]:
> > Yes, it will. Obviously, use of a drive will more likely cause
> > errors, but as long as SMART does not report any, the drive is ready
> > to go. Also, SMART can run low-level tests itself.
>
> Does this mean that if a
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 03:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.23.1449 +0200]:
> > I don't know how to test the actual functioning of a spare drive. With
> > no activity on a spare, S.M.A.R.T. may not have any data to go on.
>
> Yes, i
also sprach Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.23.1449 +0200]:
> I don't know how to test the actual functioning of a spare drive. With
> no activity on a spare, S.M.A.R.T. may not have any data to go on.
Yes, it will. Obviously, use of a drive will more likely cause
errors, but as lon
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:05:17PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I know mdadm offers a "--test" command, but it seems quite useless:
>
> -t, --test
> Generate a TestMessage alert for every array found at
> startup. This alert gets mailed and passed to the alert program. This
> can
also sprach Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.23.0505 +0200]:
> That helps with knowing that alerts are working, but I'd like to be able
> to test the spare drive in an array. Is there any way to test a spare
> device in a RAID to make sure it's in good shape and not likely to fail
> onc
I know mdadm offers a "--test" command, but it seems quite useless:
-t, --test
Generate a TestMessage alert for every array found at
startup. This alert gets mailed and passed to the alert program. This
can be used for testing that alert message to get through
successfully.
Th
6 matches
Mail list logo
