Reco wrote:
> Felix Natter wrote:
> > Can you really recommend 'apt-get dist-upgrade' over 'apt-get upgrade'?
>
> Both are useful, just for different use cases:
Yes. But actually both are required and used together. (I know you
know this because you said "tried first" in the below.)
> a) apt-g
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:52:53 +0100
Felix Natter wrote:
> >> Is it enough to install "linux-image-3.11-2-amd64" manually and then do
> >> the "apt-get upgrade"?
> >
> > There is no need to complicate things. 'apt-get dist-upgrade' will
> > suffice, and it will keep your current kernel along
Reco writes:
> Hi.
hi Reco,
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:47:24 +0100
> Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> my USB is broken on current Testing (it worked a few days ago) and I
>> suspect it's due to a kernel update:
>>
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux bitburger 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.7-1 (2013-08
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:47:24 +0100
Felix Natter wrote:
> hi,
>
> my USB is broken on current Testing (it worked a few days ago) and I
> suspect it's due to a kernel update:
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux bitburger 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.7-1 (2013-08-17) x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> Now I can
hi,
my USB is broken on current Testing (it worked a few days ago) and I
suspect it's due to a kernel update:
$ uname -a
Linux bitburger 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.7-1 (2013-08-17) x86_64
GNU/Linux
Now I can see that a new "3.11+54" would come in with a "apt-get upgrade"
(http://packages.d
5 matches
Mail list logo
