On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2015 22:16:11 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list.
> > That's a "feature" of gmail.
>
> It depends on what he uses as his SMTP server and email client.
As far as I remember the
t to see if this email gets mirrored back to me.
> >
> > B
FWIW, my test post didn't mirror back to me like the post the other day
did regarding Hulu. A one time fluke after all these years?
I'm also, getting lots of certificate updates, too, over the past few
days.
B
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 22:16:11 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list. That's
> a "feature" of gmail.
It depends on what he uses as his SMTP server and email client.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
It won't, until someone replies to it on the debian user list. That's
a "feature" of gmail.
Patrick
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Just a test to see if this email gets mirrored back to me.
>
> B
>
Just a test to see if this email gets mirrored back to me.
B
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 03:35:38 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > * Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client
>> > is working.
>>
>> Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be n
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:35:38AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > * Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is
> > > working.
> >
> > Shouldn't be (or "wou
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > * Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is
> > working.
>
> Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> agressive) a dedicate
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 20:14 +0100, Brian wrote:
> I'd suggest vgui-discuss as a suitable test-bed. Or debian-devel for
> living dangerously. :)
How about LKML? Not only for tests, but also for microblogging with
links to Facebook, Twitter and last but not least LinkIn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:14:13 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 10:22:19 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> Camaleón wrote:
>> > Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound
>> > too agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for
>> > testing how messa
On 20120712_102219, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> > agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for testing
> > how messages will appear before getting into the real "dangerous jungle"
> > and do
On Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 10:22:19 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> > agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for testing
> > how messages will appear before getting into the real "dangerous
Camaleón wrote:
> Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for testing
> how messages will appear before getting into the real "dangerous jungle"
> and don't disturbing "the beasts" (groaar!) :-)
That
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
>> To see if proper titles and headers are now coming through (one can
>> always hope).
>
> Please see the Debian mailing list code of conduct.
>
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>
> Specifically thi
David Baron wrote:
> To see if proper titles and headers are now coming through (one can always
> hope).
Please see the Debian mailing list code of conduct.
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Specifically this item:
* Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mai
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 18:13 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> To see if proper titles and headers are now coming through (one can always
> hope).
What should be bad David? The mail and the mail's source are ok here. :)
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
To see if proper titles and headers are now coming through (one can always
hope).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207111813.28747.d_ba...@012.net.i
just checking that I can post to the list?
(I tried twice replying to a post and it failed)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test post
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 13:10:06 +0200, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:27:23AM +0500, Santanu Chatterjee wrote:
>> By the way, I am not using the mailing list for posting.
>> I am using this as a newsgroup (linux.debian.user). So,
>> I felt that my news post should appear instantly.
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:27:23AM +0500, Santanu Chatterjee wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 19:30:28 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:03:58PM +0200, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> >> Why all that testing?
> >
> > People are stupid and don't realise that email isn't instant?
>
>
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 19:30:28 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:03:58PM +0200, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
>> Why all that testing?
>
> People are stupid and don't realise that email isn't instant?
Sorry friends,
After I subs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:03:58PM +0200, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Why all that testing?
People are stupid and don't realise that email isn't instant?
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: test post. Please ignore
Hello,
this is a test.
please ignore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;=01
REV:20030401T143122Z
END:VCARD
Hello,
this is a test.
please ignore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ve
> different uses.
>
> Progeny and debian should be similar, becase chief X guy, Branden,
> works (at least worked) at Progeny, and does a splendid job on X
> packages.
> >
>> Did this message make it to the list?
> yes :-)
> >
>> Actually this is also a T
they have
different uses.
Progeny and debian should be similar, becase chief X guy, Branden,
works (at least worked) at Progeny, and does a splendid job on X
packages.
>
> Did this message make it to the list?
yes :-)
>
> Actually this is also a Test-post to see if my News-reader (Gnus)
Debian use .Xdefaults or Xsession as the X-Configuration file?
Did this message make it to the list?
Actually this is also a Test-post to see if my News-reader (Gnus) does
work properly :-)
--
LinuxUser aka Josef Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
registered-linux-user # 134.818 at http://counter.li.org
Just checking the list mail features> Please ignorebegin:vcard
n:Foster;John
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:AdVance-Computing Systems;WHQ
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:President
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:John Foster
end:vcard
29 matches
Mail list logo
