ispell + TeX: dotless i and j

Hello All, is there a way to make ispell to manage correctly dotless Tex chars (e.g., \i and \j) ? Thanks in advance, Jerome

Tex characters

David Wright [2020-07-11T09:51:07-05] wrote: > In TeX, you would type in Mr~Wright, because it's considered that Mr > Wright is not the polite way to print a name in a book. I've never > tested whether modern versions of text will handle Mr Wright directly > as input, [...

Re: How to install extra TeX fonts without crud?

On 31/08/17 02:48, Curt wrote: > One way is to download the deb file and install it via 'dpkg -i > texlive-fonts-extra_2016.20170123-5_all.deb'. Thanks you for your reply. Won't dpkg refuse to install because of missing “dependencies”? -- Do not eat animals; respect them as you respect people.

Re: How to install extra TeX fonts without crud?

/1 texlive-fonts-extra*deb > > > Installing these fonts systemwide is left as an exercise for the > readers. OTOH you could start by reading §4.3 in /usr/share/doc/tex-common/TeX-on-Debian.pdf.gz or one of the other formats (txt, html). Cheers, David.

Re: How to install extra TeX fonts without crud?

On 2017-08-31, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > > On 31/08/17 02:48, Curt wrote: >> One way is to download the deb file and install it via 'dpkg -i=20 >> texlive-fonts-extra_2016.20170123-5_all.deb'. > > Thanks you for your reply. > > Won't dpkg refuse to install because of missing dependencies? d

Re: How to install extra TeX fonts without crud?

Hi. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:36:30AM -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > On 31/08/17 02:48, Curt wrote: > > One way is to download the deb file and install it via 'dpkg -i > > texlive-fonts-extra_2016.20170123-5_all.deb'. > > Thanks you for your reply. > > Won't dpkg refuse to insta

Re: How to install extra TeX fonts without crud?

s there a way to install only the TeX fonts contained in >texive-fonts-extra without the other packages? > > Thanks. > One way is to download the deb file and install it via 'dpkg -i texlive-fonts-extra_2016.20170123-5_all.deb'. For Stretch: https://packages.debia

How to install extra TeX fonts without crud?

Hello. I want to install some fonts to use in LaTeX that seem to be available only in the “texive-fonts-extra” package. The problem, is that “texive-fonts-extra” depends on a lot of fonts packages that I do not want. Is there a way to install only the TeX fonts contained in “texive-fonts-extra

Re: Unexpected \Gamma's in tex

"platex" is a command used by Japanese-tex user. I'm sorry. There was two-byte blanks in my tex source ,though they aren't apparent in my e-mail. When I removed them, everything was OK. Below is a log when compiling a tex source with two-byte blanks. $ platex 3.tex Thi

Re: Unexpected \Gamma's in tex

EenyMeenyMinyMoa wrote: > I compiled this tex source by > $ platex 3.tex > But unexpected \Gamma's as the attached file appeared. > Why? > what is platex? $ apt-cache search platex ptex-base - basic ASCII pTeX library files texlive-lang-japanese - TeX Live: Japanese pd

Unexpected \Gamma's in tex

Hi. \documentclass[28pt,a4j]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \begin{document} \begin{eqnarray*} ( \alpha \in \mathbb{C} ) \end{eqnarray*} \end{document} I compiled this tex source by $ platex 3.tex But unexpected \Gamma's as the attached file appeared. Why? Cheers, EenyMeenyMinyMoa

Re: TeX: Solovay's checksum utility

> >> Is the Solovay's checksum utility (still) distributed within Debian ? > >> Is there any alternative ? > > > > I didn't find one in the (Debian) TeX Live distro, although I must admit > > that I'm somewhat out of my depth here. But some version of

Re: TeX: Solovay's checksum utility

Hello Tomas: On 18/01/16 20:27, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:16:53PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello Forum: > >> Is the Solovay's checksum utility (still) distributed within Debian ? >> Is there any alternative ? > > I didn't

Re: TeX: Solovay's checksum utility

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:16:53PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello Forum: > > Is the Solovay's checksum utility (still) distributed within Debian ? > Is there any alternative ? I didn't find one in the (Debian) TeX Live d

TeX: Solovay's checksum utility

Hello Forum: Is the Solovay's checksum utility (still) distributed within Debian ? Is there any alternative ? Thanks in advance, Jerome

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

Hi. On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:54:01 +0100 Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:40:24 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:37:34 +0100 > > Brian wrote: > > > > > > Try downloading this document and reading it with mupdf (or a Linux > > > viewer of your choice). > > > > > >

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On 10/13/2015 10:34 AM, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Tue, October 13, 2015 7:26 am, Joseph Loo wrote: >> have you tried installing >> ghostscript on your windows machine? It will convert ps and possibly pdf to >> pcl or some other printers they have drivers for. > > Ghostscript is one of the fi

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote: > There's also a Windows port of Evince. Stuart, As a test, I found a running Windows 7 system with printer. I downloaded Evince and installed it without difficulty. Then I viewed a PDF document and printed it, without having to do any c

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

El 13/10/15 a las 16:42, Lisi Reisz escribió: On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:52:02 Mario Castelán Castro wrote: El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió: Never tell a business partner to change. One of the problems of society is that it is driven by economic interests, and more often th

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 23:29:43 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 23:24:40 Brian wrote: > > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:39:58 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 19:37:34 Brian wrote: > > > > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 17:23:22 -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > El 13/10/15 a las 16:42, Lisi Reisz escribió: > >On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:52:02 Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > >>El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió: > >>>Never tell a business partner to change. > >> > >>One of

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 23:24:40 Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:39:58 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 19:37:34 Brian wrote: > > > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the > > > standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone ca

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 23:24:40 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:39:58 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 19:37:34 Brian wrote: > > > > > > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the > > > standard. Don't forget: standards are good;

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:39:58 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 19:37:34 Brian wrote: > > > > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the > > standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :) > > :-) > > > I have a clear reco

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió: Never tell a business partner to change. One of the problems of society is that it is driven by economic interests, and more often than not, the interests which govern behavior are those of megacorporations (employers) instead of individuals. W

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 22:40:24 +0300, Reco wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:37:34 +0100 > Brian wrote: > > > > Try downloading this document and reading it with mupdf (or a Linux > > viewer of your choice). > > > > wget > > https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:52:02 Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > El 13/10/15 a las 14:55, Adrian O'Dell escribió: > > Never tell a business partner to change. > > One of the problems of society is that it is driven by economic > interests, and more often than not, the interests which govern behav

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 19:37:34 Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 13:12:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 04:57:07 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > > > On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-proof method, and

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

El 13/10/15 a las 14:38, Brian escribió: On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 14:04:44 -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:37 pm, Brian wrote: There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :)

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

Never tell a business partner to change. On 10/13/2015 02:45 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: El 13/10/15 a las 14:38, Brian escribió: On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 14:04:44 -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:37 pm, Brian wrote: There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

Hi. On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:37:34 +0100 Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 13:12:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 04:57:07 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > > > On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 14:04:44 -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:37 pm, Brian wrote: > > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the > > standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :) > > You make a good point, which

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:37 pm, Brian wrote: > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the > standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :) You make a good point, which I overlooked. My concern was that PDF might have been "enhanced" over the y

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 13:12:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 04:57:07 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > > On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-proof method, and you get the > > > advantages of the PDF specification.

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue, October 13, 2015 7:26 am, Joseph Loo wrote: > have you tried installing > ghostscript on your windows machine? It will convert ps and possibly pdf to > pcl or some other printers they have drivers for. Ghostscript is one of the first solutions which occurred to me. I found a HOWTO, but it

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be > readable by Windows XP or Vista? Yes, assuming they have installed acrobat reader (or similar), which is basically a requirement. -- Don Armstrong http:/

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On 10/13/2015 05:12 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 04:57:07 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: >> On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: >>> Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-proof method, and you get the >>> advantages of the PDF specification. >>> >>> [It's also p

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 04:57:07 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-proof method, and you get the > > advantages of the PDF specification. > > > > [It's also probably time to move away from pdflatex to xe

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On 13/10/15 15:45, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote: >> There's also a Windows port of Evince. > > Thanks, Stuart; that knowledge may be useful. But installing Evince > likely is beyond the technical ability of my associate. I hope that he > h

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:54:28AM -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: [...] > Many thanks, Tomas. For years I have been wary of Adobe Reader, but I had > no idea that there were alternatives to Adobe Reader for Windows. Hey, thank *you*, Russ for he

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Tue, October 13, 2015 1:55 am, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > (Executive summary: there are lots of nice, free PDF viewers, even for > Windows. The FSF has been making an effort to publicize that fact [3] and > to get web pages to recommend those alternatives too). > [1] > [2

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:45:33AM -0500, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote: > > There's also a Windows port of Evince. > > Thanks, Stuart; that knowledge may be useful. But installing Evince > like

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:23:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > [...] I haven't looked > at a .dvi for years. I remember they're very quick to page through > multi-page documents, but graphic includes were a problem. FWIW I still use dvi for the "loc

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Mon, October 12, 2015 11:15 pm, Stuart Longland wrote: > There's also a Windows port of Evince. Thanks, Stuart; that knowledge may be useful. But installing Evince likely is beyond the technical ability of my associate. I hope that he has Adobe Reader running. Recently I was in an office and

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On 13/10/15 14:09, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > On Debian, I have been using evince, but that is to view documents which I > obtain from other sources. There's also a Windows port of Evince. -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somew

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:23 pm, David Wright wrote: > Most people nowadays would produce .pdf files from LaTeX. I use > LuaLaTeX myself but I'm sure there are alternatives. I haven't looked > at a .dvi for years. I remember they're very quick to page through > multi-page documents, but graphic in

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: > Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-proof method, and you get the > advantages of the PDF specification. > > [It's also probably time to move away from pdflatex to xelatex or > some other LaTeX engine with real utf8 support.] Thanks for b

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

Quoting rlhar...@oplink.net (rlhar...@oplink.net): > I use LaTeX to create a .tex document file, then I use dvips to generate > a .ps file to send to my Postscript printer. > > I would like to send a document file (.tex or .dvi or .ps) as an > email attachment to an associate so th

Re: print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > I would like to send a document file (.tex or .dvi or .ps) as an email > attachment to an associate so that he can print a copy and file it. > There is no need for him to edit the file. But my associate is running > Windows, and doe

print .tex or .dvi or .ps from Windows

I use LaTeX to create a .tex document file, then I use dvips to generate a .ps file to send to my Postscript printer. I would like to send a document file (.tex or .dvi or .ps) as an email attachment to an associate so that he can print a copy and file it. There is no need for him to edit the

Re: [MediaWiki-l] Pure TeX extension wanted

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 23:36 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi John, > > looks like I am going to have to write one as its removed from 1.18 > and anyway it was colored and only supported a subset of TeX anyway. > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > On 17 September 2013 19:

Re: dvipdfm (TeX/LaTeX) not working

On Sb, 25 mai 13, 10:34:56, Charles Blair wrote: >I have been using TeX/LaTeX on a debian distribution > installed about two years ago. Tex and LaTeX themselves > are working, as is xdvi. I just noticed that dvipdfm > is not working. Even when run on a simple input, I get

Re: dvipdfm (TeX/LaTeX) not working

On Sat 25 May 2013 at 10:34:56 -0500, Charles Blair wrote: >I have been using TeX/LaTeX on a debian distribution > installed about two years ago. Tex and LaTeX themselves > are working, as is xdvi. I just noticed that dvipdfm > is not working. Even when run on a simple input,

dvipdfm (TeX/LaTeX) not working

I have been using TeX/LaTeX on a debian distribution installed about two years ago. Tex and LaTeX themselves are working, as is xdvi. I just noticed that dvipdfm is not working. Even when run on a simple input, I get the errors: ** WARNING ** Failed to load AGL file "pdfglyphlis

Re: What is happening to tex in debian?

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:23:43 -0600, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > *Now, a few of the livetex packages have new 2011 versions, many not. > The one without > includes amstex, which I am using. Anybody knows what is happening, and > when the new tex will be complete? Have yo

Re: wheezy: problems installing tex-live

On Mi, 28 mar 12, 12:23:25, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > > Thanks! but what I really want is to pin > r-base-*,r-cran-* etc > to always come from unstable. How can I augment /etc/apt/preferences > to do that? Based on examples from 'man apt_preferences' (untested): Package: r-base-* Pin:

Re: wheezy: problems installing tex-live

Thanks! see below. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 28 mar 12, 09:40:38, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > > > > > > > kjetil@kjetil:~$ sudo apt-get install texlive --fix-broken > > > > > > Why the "--fix-broken", do you have broken packages on your system (try >

Re: wheezy: problems installing tex-live

On Mi, 28 mar 12, 09:40:38, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > > > > > kjetil@kjetil:~$ sudo apt-get install texlive --fix-broken > > > > Why the "--fix-broken", do you have broken packages on your system (try > > 'apt-get check')? > > kjetil@kjetil:~$ sudo apt-get check > [sudo] password for k

Re: wheezy: problems installing tex-live

see below: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:08, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 28 mar 12, 08:53:41, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > > Hola! > > > > I have an mostly wheezy system with a few packages from sid (r-base, > r-cran > > mostly) > > Now I cannot install texlive! > > Please post the output

Re: wheezy: problems installing tex-live

On Mi, 28 mar 12, 08:53:41, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > Hola! > > I have an mostly wheezy system with a few packages from sid (r-base, r-cran > mostly) > Now I cannot install texlive! Please post the output of 'apt-cache policy'. > kjetil@kjetil:~$ sudo apt-get install texlive --fix-b

wheezy: problems installing tex-live

Hola! I have an mostly wheezy system with a few packages from sid (r-base, r-cran mostly) Now I cannot install texlive! kjetil@kjetil:~$ sudo apt-get install texlive --fix-broken Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be i

Re: TeX: Corrupted NFSS tables

On 13/12/10 18:01, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: On 2010-12-13 10:58, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List, On 13/12/10 17:25, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: Hi I am getting mysterious errors with pdflatex: LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT4/cmr/m/n' undefined (Font) using `OT4/cmr/m/n'

Re: TeX: Corrupted NFSS tables

On 2010-12-13 10:58, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello List, > > On 13/12/10 17:25, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am getting mysterious errors with pdflatex: >> >>> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT4/cmr/m/n' undefined >>> (Font) using `OT4/cmr/m/n' instead on input line 100. >

Re: TeX: Corrupted NFSS tables

Hello List, On 13/12/10 17:25, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: Hi I am getting mysterious errors with pdflatex: LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT4/cmr/m/n' undefined (Font) using `OT4/cmr/m/n' instead on input line 100. ! Corrupted NFSS tables. wr...@fontshape ...message {Corrupted

TeX: Corrupted NFSS tables

Hi I am getting mysterious errors with pdflatex: > LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT4/cmr/m/n' undefined > (Font) using `OT4/cmr/m/n' instead on input line 100. > > ! Corrupted NFSS tables. > wr...@fontshape ...message {Corrupted NFSS tables} >

Re: Recovering removed .tex files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rodolfo Medina wrote: > Today I removed some .tex files with the `rm' command. They were not very > important, of course, but now I'm thinking that I'd had better wait before > removing them. > > I sometimes heard about

Recovering removed .tex files

Today I removed some .tex files with the `rm' command. They were not very important, of course, but now I'm thinking that I'd had better wait before removing them. I sometimes heard about the possibility of recovering erased files. Is that true? I tried `foremost' with n

TeX: system's default paper size

There is a discussion going on on d-d [1], whether TeX should support other paper formats as *system-wide* default for paper size, apart from 'a4paper' and 'letter'. Does anyone on this list have a desire and/or could give some arguments, why and where it would be useful to us

Re: aptitude dist-upgrade and tex dependencies

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:38:13PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > I don't know how the TeX team are managing their transition offhand. > A start would be to figure out which packages are forcing the upgrade of > tetex-extra -- you could find this out by, e.g., going into the

Re: aptitude dist-upgrade and tex dependencies

and exciting bugs if I had the time, but I don't. It would be interesting to know what's pulling in tetex-extra. If you held back all the packages that require it, you could pull off a partial upgrade. It looks like most of the packages that requires tetex-extra are TeX-related, like

aptitude dist-upgrade and tex dependencies

es from forcing an upgrade, unfortunately. I was planning to file a support bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED], now I'm thinking, I should file a separate bug report on the package dependencies, because all I've been using was tetex, and it is only because some packages wrongly depends on t

Re: tetex to live tex

On Jul 4, 2:40 pm, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BartlebyScrivener wrote: Thank you. I'm running Etch. rd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tetex to live tex

BartlebyScrivener wrote: > I've seen a few threads where some folks have had trouble installing > live tex. > > What is the current status of this under Etch? Etch is stable. So packages under it does not change except for security upgrade. So there is no question of this tran

tetex to live tex

I've seen a few threads where some folks have had trouble installing live tex. What is the current status of this under Etch? Is the recommended procedure to remove tetex first? Or can they coexist? I use Synaptic mainly. Thanks for any help. rd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

* KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070425 15:42]: > > While the installation of texlive went fine with my Sid box, it did take > quite a lot of space doing that upgrade. It ended up using more than > 500MB in my /usr partition. Did anyone notice that? In my installation of etch, /usr/share/texmf-texlive o

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Russell L. Harris wrote: >> Johannes Wiedersich escribió: >>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install >>> texlive'? > > Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you > must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing > TeXLive.

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

On 2007-04-15, Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Johannes Wiedersich escribió: >>> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install >>> texlive'? > > Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you > must purge all the teTeX configuration fi

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

> Johannes Wiedersich escribió: >> Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install >> texlive'? Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing TeXLive. I failed to do so, and ended up re

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johannes Wiedersich escribió: > I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to > TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a > happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just won

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Johannes Wiedersich wrote the following on 11.04.2007 19:49: > Thilo Six wrote: >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html > > From there, I get: > < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

* Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070411 12:42]: > I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to > TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I have been using teTeX under Etch to generate a variety of complicated documents, t

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:49 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Thilo Six wrote: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html > > From there, I get: > < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Thilo Six wrote: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html From there, I get: < the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live < 2007 to unstable. Doesn't concern etch. Having both available on etch, when should *

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

On 4/11/07, Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when is the b

Re: teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

Johannes Wiedersich wrote the following on 11.04.2007 19:37: > I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to > TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a > happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when

teTeX --> TeX live: When to migrate?

I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when is the best time to migrate: now, later or should I wait for an auto

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

Am 2007-02-21 12:25:06, schrieb Kevin Mark: > Hi Michelle, > I have 2 suggestions: > I wanted to make a hard copy of the sarge installation manual. I was > able to send a pdf file to an email address assigned to a Kinko's store > (US printing chain). They were able to have it printed 2-sided with a

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

Hi again, Michelle. I think that, for such a long document (2500 pages, 11 volumes), LaTeX makes very good sense. Using the LaTeX "\include" directive, you could keep each volume in a separate file, and yet LaTeX would process the set of files as one large document. And LaTeX provides valuabl

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

* Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070221 11:14]: > Hello Russel, > > Now I have to build a collection of three editons (de, en, fr) of > Education-Books of each 2500 Pages which will be splitted into 11 > volumes. > > I do not know, wheter TeX is the right way t

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

de, en, fr) of > Education-Books of each 2500 Pages which will be splitted into 11 > volumes. > > It is all about Debian GNU/Linux. > > I have already encountered the TeXLive stuff and have a question: > > I do not know, wheter TeX is the right way to go, but I need at the en

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

nux. I have already encountered the TeXLive stuff and have a question: I do not know, wheter TeX is the right way to go, but I need at the end the Books as Hard-Copies, PDF's and HTML (maybe other fromats too). 1) Do you recommend to use TeXLive or should I use another Format like SGML or X

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

Sjoerd> What to install when you would like to give TeX/LaTeX a try? tetex is the package you want to use. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:57:36AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote: > If you install the Debian TeXLive package, you should find that LaTeX > works as it formerly did in TeTeX. I am running TeTeX under Etch on > one i386 machine, and TeXLive under Etch on another i386 machine, and > I have not seen

Re: Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

* Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070217 10:42]: > Running Sarge. > What to install when you would like to give TeX/LaTeX a try? > > In Synaptic I see something named latex209-base, but it says: > LaTeX 2.09 is obsolete. Use LaTeX 2e. > But there's no package cal

Installing TeX/LaTeX in Sarge

Hi, Running Sarge. What to install when you would like to give TeX/LaTeX a try? In Synaptic I see something named latex209-base, but it says: LaTeX 2.09 is obsolete. Use LaTeX 2e. But there's no package called latex2e or something, nor do I see anything else that looks like it could be the

TeX variants

There are a number of TeX variants and no doubt one would have been made for guitar tabs. Long long ago in a galaxy far far away I used 'musixtex' - but that it used for piano and orchestral arrangements - I can't recall if it did guitar tabs as well. It takes a few days

Re: Which TeX distribution to use?

* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070203 21:56]: > > I am wondering which Debian TeX packages to use, TeXLive or teTeX. I > have been using teTeX, and it has been all right. However, some parts > seem to be outdated, such as ConTeXt (which I use)... Thomas Esser, the man wh

Re: Which TeX distribution to use?

kages separate from TeXLive and generally more up to date. You can find them at http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/context My current favorite is the 2007.01.12.2-1 but there are newer versions too. You'll also need some packages from teTeX or TeXLive for generic tex functions and fonts. I recom

Re: Which TeX distribution to use?

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:18:33AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian users, > > I am wondering which Debian TeX packages to use, TeXLive or teTeX. I > have been using teTeX, and it has been all right. However, some parts > seem to be outdated, such as ConTeXt (which I

Which TeX distribution to use?

Dear Debian users, I am wondering which Debian TeX packages to use, TeXLive or teTeX. I have been using teTeX, and it has been all right. However, some parts seem to be outdated, such as ConTeXt (which I use), and this results in some missing features. Here's the detail: % texexec --ve

  1   2   3   4   5   >