Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-23 Thread Marco Möller
On 1/23/25 00:14, didier gaumet wrote: Le 22/01/2025 à 23:41, Marco Möller a écrit : On 1/22/25 23:23, didier gaumet wrote: Debian provides realtime kernels in its repositories. For an AMD64 PC and Debian 12 Bookworm (without backports), the last LTS realtime kernel package is: linux-image-6.

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread didier gaumet
Le 22/01/2025 à 23:41, Marco Möller a écrit : On 1/22/25 23:23, didier gaumet wrote: Debian provides realtime kernels in its repositories. For an AMD64 PC and Debian 12 Bookworm (without backports), the last LTS realtime kernel package is: linux-image-6.1.0-29-rt-amd64 Do I understand correc

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Marco Möller
On 1/22/25 23:12, Michael Stone wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:07:57PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote: You mean, linux-image-amd64 in bookworm-backports, which currently draws in  linux-image-6.12.9+bpo-amd64 (= 6.12.9-1~bpo12+1), can be expected to NOT draw in some 6.13 like 6.13~rc7+1~exp1 curr

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Marco Möller
On 1/22/25 23:23, didier gaumet wrote: Debian provides realtime kernels in its repositories. For an AMD64 PC and Debian 12 Bookworm (without backports), the last LTS realtime kernel package is: linux-image-6.1.0-29-rt-amd64 Do I understand correctly, that the rt-kernels like the one you ment

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread didier gaumet
Le 22/01/2025 à 23:23, didier gaumet a écrit : [...) DAW usage and I don not think he was not using backports) [...) I did not take time to read myself before posting, sorry: "I do not think he was using backports" is more correct ;-)

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread didier gaumet
Le 22/01/2025 à 21:48, Marco Möller a écrit : On 1/22/25 01:12, Greg Wooledge wrote: It's not yet clear to me whether you're trying to use a backported kernel because you *need* it, or because it has a higher number and you think higher numbers are better. I would like to optimize my laptop f

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:07:57PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote: You mean, linux-image-amd64 in bookworm-backports, which currently draws in linux-image-6.12.9+bpo-amd64 (= 6.12.9-1~bpo12+1), can be expected to NOT draw in some 6.13 like 6.13~rc7+1~exp1 currently already having appeared in the ex

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Marco Möller
On 1/22/25 22:32, Michael Stone wrote: I think the problem here is a misunderstanding of how backports work: they're not "the latest kernel", they're "the latest kernel from debian testing". You're not going to see a kernel in backports that's not going to be in trixie until after the trixie re

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:48:24PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote: Well, I thought that some easy receipt would pop up as an answer to my question on how to achieve such automatic upgrades. As this did not happen I conclude that the wished procedure is not so common and not readily worked out by now

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Marco Möller
ackage would add to the backports kernel team, though. Well, at least I will place the suggestion to provide one, and if they cannot do, then I of course understand and accept. Thanks a lot to all of you trying to help me! It is much appreciated!

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-22 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:00:49AM +0100, Marco Möller wrote: > On 1/22/25 00:10, George at Clug wrote: > > I apologise, but I do not understand what it is you want to achieve or what > > it is that you are asking. > > > > Can you please give more explanation? > > I want to install the currently

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread Max Nikulin
On 22/01/2025 03:17, Marco Möller wrote: Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in Bookworm Backports when doing "apt update && apt upgrade", but to not leave the 6.12 (upstream LTS) branch and not

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:00:49 +0100, Marco Möller wrote: > On 1/22/25 00:10, George at Clug wrote: > > I apologise, but I do not understand what it is you want to achieve or what > > it is that you are asking. > > > > Can you please give more explanation? > > I want to install the currently h

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread Marco Möller
On 1/22/25 00:10, George at Clug wrote: I apologise, but I do not understand what it is you want to achieve or what it is that you are asking. Can you please give more explanation? I want to install the currently highest version of kernel 6.12 from bookworm-backports to my Bookworm. Upon som

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread George at Clug
Marco, I apologise, but I do not understand what it is you want to achieve or what it is that you are asking. Can you please give more explanation? You said: "not leave the 6.12 (upstream LTS) branch and not upgrade to some higher kernel version like 6.13 when they would also become available

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread Marco Möller
On 1/21/25 21:39, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote: Hello community! Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in Bookworm Backports when doing "apt

Re: Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote: > Hello community! > Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for > applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in Bookworm > Backports when doing "apt update && apt upgrade", but to not lea

Backports (bookworm), upgrade to all x for kernel 6.12.x, but not upgrade to 6.13

2025-01-21 Thread Marco Möller
Hello community! Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in Bookworm Backports when doing "apt update && apt upgrade", but to not leave the 6.12 (upstream LTS) branch and not upgrade to some higher

Quick ANN to all DataLad and git-annex users

2023-06-29 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear DataLad and git-annex users, We started planning a first meeting for everyone interested in DataLad and git-annex in the first half of 2024! If you find that as exhilarating as we do, head over to https://t.co/7RjLHyWtnl and help us shape the event. Cheers, -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center f

Re: Thanks to all -- Re: Does Debian have a "nag" tool?

2020-08-15 Thread Paul M Foster
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 08:46:18AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > "remind" is the appropriate tool. > It does NOT rely on anything other than computer being turned on. > With appropriate script it can "nag" me ;} > q.v. > https://manpages.debian.org/buster/remind/remind.1.en.html > https://dianne

Thanks to all -- Re: Does Debian have a "nag" tool?

2020-08-15 Thread Richard Owlett
"remind" is the appropriate tool. It does NOT rely on anything other than computer being turned on. With appropriate script it can "nag" me ;} q.v. https://manpages.debian.org/buster/remind/remind.1.en.html https://dianne.skoll.ca/projects/remind/ On 08/15/2020 06:30 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: J

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-10 Thread Fungi4All
From: joel.r...@gmail.com > And Now Google Doesn't Think Users Should Ever Set Headers. > Progress is progress. Yeah. Progress is progress. ahem. Sorry. I guess I forgot something. {irony}Progress is progress.{end-irony} -- Joel Rees If you live in a cave this may actually have some meaning amo

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-10 Thread Joel Rees
sending extra copies to people who are >>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect. >> >> Not if the list is properly configured. >> >> Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users, >> but the users should reject that burden. I

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-10 Thread Fungi4All
orrect. > > Not if the list is properly configured. > > Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users, > but the users should reject that burden. I do. > > I will not answer Gene's message, he obviously missed the whole point of > my mai

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-09 Thread Joel Rees
gt; > Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users, > but the users should reject that burden. I do. > > I will not answer Gene's message, he obviously missed the whole point of > my mail. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George Ther

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-09 Thread The Wanderer
What configuration would avoid this result, when using "Reply to All"? When using "Reply", a mailing-list configuration which sets Reply-To to point back to the list (presumably in addition to any Reply-To set by the user, or only when the user did not set such) would avoid that

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-09 Thread Nicolas George
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit : > Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are > subscribed to the list, which is incorrect. Not if the list is properly configured. Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users, bu

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port)

2017-06-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 09 June 2017 10:47:29 Nicolas George wrote: > Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to > > All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are > > answer

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port)

2017-06-09 Thread Fungi4All
UTC Time: June 9, 2017 2:47 PM From: geo...@nsup.org To: Charlie Kravetz debian-user@lists.debian.org Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to > All", since that sends individual emails to th

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again

2017-06-09 Thread The Wanderer
On 2017-06-09 at 10:47, Nicolas George wrote: > Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > >> When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to >> All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are >> answ

Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port)

2017-06-09 Thread Nicolas George
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to > All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are > answering. This recommendation is unsustainable and should be eliminated from the

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread John T. Haggerty
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:38 AM John T. Haggerty > wrote: > >> Any thoughts for or against Amazon? >> >> > Please don't top post on this list, it breaks up the flow of the thread > for people who read the thread after it's finished. The

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:38 AM John T. Haggerty wrote: > Any thoughts for or against Amazon? > > Please don't top post on this list, it breaks up the flow of the thread for people who read the thread after it's finished. The primary purpose of the list is to get your questions answered, but the

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread John T. Haggerty
I like that. I'm worried about one of the requirements here (under "Things you will need"): " - A permanent *internet connection *and an* IP address* for your mail server that does not change. The IP address should *not be blacklisted* on the internet. Check the IP address at web sites

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread John T. Haggerty
I have been able to create websites, and am able to use the fqdn to show up my web page I have hosed on the server. I just have to have ddclient update the ip address with the dns settings. I just have the box NATed behind the router. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, emetib wrote: > On Thursday,

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread emetib
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 4:20:05 AM UTC-5, John T. Haggerty wrote: > I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem to > differ): > > 1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever. > > 2. Postfix gets installed. > > 3. "Internet site " is

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread メット
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016年8月25日 18:15:48 JST, "John T. Haggerty" wrote: >I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem >to >differ): > >1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever. > >2. Postfix gets installed. >

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-26 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 25 August 2016 19:39:18 John T. Haggerty wrote: > If it's only Gmail, why van I telnet to their port and get their mail > server? > > Seems counterintuitive. Were you expecting Gmail to be either intuitive or logical?? :-o Lisi

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-25 Thread Jochen Spieker
John T. Haggerty: > > I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem to > differ): > > 1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever. Please use example.com when you do not want to disclose your real domain name. The domain whatever.org does not be

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-25 Thread John T. Haggerty
So how do you dynamically specify getting a connection to be secured or not. If it's only Gmail, why van I telnet to their port and get their mail server? Seems counterintuitive. On Aug 25, 2016 5:54 AM, "Mark Fletcher" wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 at 18:16, John T. Haggerty wrote: > >> I ha

Re: Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-25 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 at 18:16, John T. Haggerty wrote: > I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem to > differ): > > 1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever. > > 2. Postfix gets installed. > > 3. "Internet site " is enabled fqdn added. >

Getting fqdn, postfix, Comcast to all play nice together

2016-08-25 Thread John T. Haggerty
I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem to differ): 1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever. 2. Postfix gets installed. 3. "Internet site " is enabled fqdn added. 4. Email cannot be sent out to my Gmail address since it magically "ti

Re: A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-21 Thread Richard Owlett
On 1/21/2016 3:09 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:48:16PM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote: Thanks to all who've helped me climb the learning curve of Debian 8.2 [...] Thanks to you for asking the right questions in the right way :-) [...] I hope I get to pay it fo

Re: A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-21 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Steve. On 21/01/16 00:48, Steve Matzura wrote: > Thanks to all who've helped me climb the learning curve of Debian 8.2 > to get my system up and running. Specific thanks go, in no particular > order, to Daniel, Gary, Reco, Lisi, Dan, Mudongliang, Joe, the > Wanderer, Rick

Re: A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-21 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:48:16PM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote: > Thanks to all who've helped me climb the learning curve of Debian 8.2 You're welcome. Glad to be of help. > Thanks again to all of you, and I hope I get to pay it forward. Looking forward to it. Reco

Re: A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-21 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 21 January 2016 09:09:12 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > You've asked, you've been polite and patient, you've read the answers > and tried to make sense of all -- you have motivated people here to > figure out things... thanks for your contribution :-) Hear! Hear! You have been great in thi

Re: A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-21 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 21 January 2016 03:48:16 Steve Matzura wrote: > Thanks to all who've helped me climb the learning curve of Debian 8.2 > to get my system up and running. Specific thanks go, in no particular > order, to Daniel, Gary, Reco, Lisi, Dan, Mudongliang, Joe, the > Wanderer,

Re: A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-21 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:48:16PM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote: > Thanks to all who've helped me climb the learning curve of Debian 8.2 [...] Thanks to you for asking the right questions in the right way :-) > [...] I hope I get to pay

A heart-felt thank-you to all

2016-01-20 Thread Steve Matzura
Thanks to all who've helped me climb the learning curve of Debian 8.2 to get my system up and running. Specific thanks go, in no particular order, to Daniel, Gary, Reco, Lisi, Dan, Mudongliang, Joe, the Wanderer, Rick Thomas, and many others who took the time and had the patience to bootstr

How to cross-compile a software from source on amd64 Debian system to all different architectures Debian supports without getting the libglib2.0-dev conflict in multiarch?

2015-08-10 Thread nurupo
iarch, we will create chroots for every single architecture Debian supports, since that will solve the issue of the libglib2.0-dev conflict. Once we have the chroots, we will try using the host system's (which is amd64) cross-compilers to all different Debian architectures and somehow make th

Re: Thanks to All

2013-05-01 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 01 May 2013, staticsafe wrote: > On 5/1/2013 3:27, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > > If you need any help, feel free to subscribe to freebsd-questions[0]. > > [0] - http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > Yes, thanks - already done that. I'm enjoying my exploration of Fr

Re: Thanks to All

2013-05-01 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 1 May 2013 09:40:28 +1200 Chris Bannister wrote: Hello Chris, >I think the point is that it has nothing to do with age. Ah, I see. Obviously, I'm not as wise as I am old. :-) -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately a

Re: Thanks to All

2013-05-01 Thread staticsafe
On 5/1/2013 3:27, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 01 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Hugo, >>> mine neither >>> >>> Are you saying that you don't take

Re: Thanks to All

2013-05-01 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 01 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom > > wrote: > > > > Hello Hugo, > > > > >mine neither > > > > Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or > > deve

Re: Thanks to All

2013-04-30 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > Hello Hugo, > > >mine neither > > Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or > developer's morality (insofar as it's possible to know their mo

Re: Thanks to All

2013-04-30 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hello Hugo, >mine neither Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or developer's morality (insofar as it's possible to know their moral stance) when choosing a product/app/whatever? -- Regards _ / )

Re: Thanks to All

2013-04-30 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
John Hasler wrote: Siard writes: AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/ manufacturers/developers. That has not been my experience.

Re: Thanks to All

2013-04-30 Thread Siard
John Hasler writes: > Siard writes: > > AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical > > aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important > > the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/ > > manufacturers/developers. > > That has not

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700 Patrick Bartek wrote: Hello Patrick, >I installed Claws-Mail and only the "Fancy" plugin. It works, sort >of: Format HTML correctly, but doesn't show images. Config problem? >Don't know. Yet. Yes. Even if the "Load images" option is set to yes, there are

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:36:53 +0200 Siard wrote: Hello Siard, >AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical >aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important >the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/ >manufacturers/developers. W

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:36:25 -0700,Alan Ianson wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700 > Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100 > > Brad Rogers wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700 > > > Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > > > > Hello Patrick, > > > > > >

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Alan Ianson
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100 > Brad Rogers wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700 > > Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > > Hello Patrick, > > > > >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know. > > >Haven't gott

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:08:16 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > On 04/29/2013 10:10 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400 > > Frank McCormick wrote: > > > >> On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > >>> [snip] > >>> I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100 Brad Rogers wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700 > Patrick Bartek wrote: > > Hello Patrick, > > >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know. > >Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, maybe, > >they are similar.

Re: Thanks to All

2013-04-29 Thread John Hasler
Siard writes: > AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical > aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important > the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/ > manufacturers/developers. That has not been my experience. -- John Hasle

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Siard
Brad Rogers: > Siard: > > But that horrible logo just about put the lid on it. It was a > > picture of a bird's claw. Then I realized: I'm not of their kind. > > Back to Sylpheed! > > Each to their own, of course. I don't care about logos, etc. If the > program does what I want, then it's fine

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:41:17 +0200 Siard wrote: Hello Siard, >Using Sylpheed, I once tried Claws. For messages marked with a color >in Sylpheed, the colors got lost. It had a couple of extra bells and IDK why that happened. I never used colouring in Sylpheed, so can't even hazard guess for t

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Siard
Brad Rogers: > Patrick Bartek: > > Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know. > > Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, > > maybe, they are similar. > > Look 'n' feel is similar, but one of the reasons for the split was the > ever increasing difficulty of

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Frank McCormick
On 04/29/2013 10:10 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: [snip] I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, instead of me having to switch to a different workspace where google-chr

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700 Patrick Bartek wrote: Hello Patrick, >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know. >Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, maybe, >they are similar. Look 'n' feel is similar, but one of the reasons for the split was the

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > [snip] > > I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, > > instead of me having to switch to a different workspace where > > google-chrome is running all the time. Wou

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:45:46 +0100 Darac Marjal wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard > > wrote: > > > [cut] > > > > google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen. > > > > I just wish it could open in Sylphe

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Darac Marjal
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard > wrote: > [cut] > > google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen. > > I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, instead > of me having to switch to a different

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Siard
Lisi Reisz: > Siard: > > Check whether you can open chrome + url from the command line like > > this: $ chrome www.google.com > > If this works, then  chrome '%s'  should work with the 'Open' menu > > option mentioned above. > > I type (without the < and >) in the launcher to get > Crome opened.

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-29 Thread Siard
Patrick Bartek wrote: > google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen. > > I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, instead > of me having to switch to a different workspace where google-chrome is > running all the time. Instead of google-chrome, you could try midori, an

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Frank McCormick
On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard wrote: Patrick Bartek: Siard: [snip] Wait a minute. In Sylpheed, html messages can be viewed with an external browser. (Right click > Open...) An "Open" option is not available. And I can't find any s

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard wrote: > Patrick Bartek: > > Siard: > >[snip] > > > > > > Wait a minute. In Sylpheed, html messages can be viewed with an > > > external browser. (Right click > Open...) > > > > An "Open" option is not available. And I can't find any such > > option in

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 28 April 2013 18:36:06 Siard wrote: > Check whether you can open chrome + url from the command line like this: > $ chrome www.google.com > If this works, then  chrome '%s'  should work with the 'Open' menu option > mentioned above. I type (without the < and >) in the launcher to get Cro

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Siard
Patrick Bartek: > Siard: > > Patrick Bartek: > > > Frank McCormick: > > > > Sylpheed simply strips all the extraneous codes out and > > > > displays HTML as text. As far as I know there are no plugins which > > > > would help it to display HTML as they are supposed to be rendered. > > > > CLAWS

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:17:11 +0200 Siard wrote: > Patrick Bartek: > > Frank McCormick: > > > Sylpheed simply strips all the extraneous codes out and > > > displays HTML as text. As far as I know there are no plugins which > > > would help it to display HTML as they are supposed to be rendered

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Siard
Patrick Bartek: > Frank McCormick: > > Sylpheed simply strips all the extraneous codes out and > > displays HTML as text. As far as I know there are no plugins which > > would help it to display HTML as they are supposed to be rendered. > > CLAWS which is a Sylpheed spinoff does have ways to di

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-28 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:06:33 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > On 04/27/2013 07:10 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:48:55 -0400, Rob Owens > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > >>> > >>> [snip > >>> > >>> All that's left to do othe

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-27 Thread Frank McCormick
On 04/27/2013 07:10 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:48:55 -0400, Rob Owens wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: [snip All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding how to handle those HTML e-mails with all their pretty gr

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-27 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:48:55 -0400, Rob Owens wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > > [snip > > > > All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding > > how to handle those HTML e-mails with all their pretty graphics and > > pictures I get

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-27 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:34:28 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > > > [snip > > > > All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding > > how to handle those HTML e-mails with all their pretty graphics and > > pictures

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-27 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > Thanks to all who helped getting my Yahoo Mail account switched over to a > standard e-mail client, currently Sylpheed 3.2.0. I've always hated using > the web interface. > > All that's left to do other

Re: Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-27 Thread Rob Owens
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > Thanks to all who helped getting my Yahoo Mail account switched over to a > standard e-mail client, currently Sylpheed 3.2.0. I've always hated using > the web interface. > > All that's left to do other

Thanks to All (Was: MUA & Yahoo)

2013-04-27 Thread Patrick Bartek
Thanks to all who helped getting my Yahoo Mail account switched over to a standard e-mail client, currently Sylpheed 3.2.0. I've always hated using the web interface. All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding how to handle those HTML e-mails with all th

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Jason Heeris wrote: > On 1 March 2012 14:22, Bob Proulx wrote: >>> >>> If it's static, you can add it to "/etc/issue". >> >> Or if the process can update /etc/issue before getty can display it. > > rc.local appears to run before the contents of /etc/issue is > disp

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Tom H wrote: >> Jason Heeris wrote: >> > >> > line (ttyS0) and the usual tty ones. I would like to print a message >> > at the very end of the boot sequence, but before any user logs in (the >> > message is a diagnostic that may affect whether th

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Jason Heeris
On 1 March 2012 14:26, Jason Heeris wrote: > Incidentally, it contains escape sequences ( \n \l ) at the end. Are > they for use with "echo -e" or something else entirely? Ah, just found the answer to this in "man issue" — they're escape sequences for getty (or whatever substitute). — Jason --

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Jason Heeris
On 1 March 2012 14:22, Bob Proulx wrote: >> If it's static, you can add it to "/etc/issue". > > Or if the process can update /etc/issue before getty can display it. rc.local appears to run before the contents of /etc/issue is displayed... is that guaranteed (in squeeze), or just coincidental on m

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Bob Proulx
Bob Proulx wrote: > okay. The contents are displayed when getting displays the login > prompt. Meaning that when getting is started it will catch the Grr... s/getting/getty/g My typos are getting worse. Sorry for the noise. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Bob Proulx
Tom H wrote: > Jason Heeris wrote: > > line (ttyS0) and the usual tty ones. I would like to print a message > > at the very end of the boot sequence, but before any user logs in (the > > message is a diagnostic that may affect whether the user logs in at all). > > If it's static, you can add it to

Re: Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Tom H
is a diagnostic that may affect whether the user logs in at > all). > > If I put, say, echo "Message" in /etc/rc.local, it only shows up on > the serial console. How can I print a message to all consoles? "rc.local" will only display an "echo..." on the cons

Print a message to all terminals at boot

2012-02-29 Thread Jason Heeris
, echo "Message" in /etc/rc.local, it only shows up on the serial console. How can I print a message to all consoles? Cheers, Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia

Re: How to distribute IRQs to all cores

2011-08-25 Thread Stan Hoeppner
ce works. > How can I distribute the interrupt of RX in ixgbevf to all cores? This should already be working over at least 4 cores if this is a dual socket quad core machine, and 8 cores if this is a single socket system with an 8 core CPU with a single shared L3, such as AMD's 8 core Magny Cour

How to distribute IRQs to all cores

2011-08-25 Thread J.Hwan Kim
Hi, everyone The interrupts of my ixgbevf driver occurs only Core 0 although the user space "irqbalance" serivce is working. How can I distribute the interrupt of RX in ixgbevf to all cores? cat /proc/interrupts | grep "isv" 97: 8 0 0

Re: Debian Newbie need help - belated thank you to all

2011-04-03 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:06:52 -0400 (EDT), p3qwes...@hushmail.com wrote: > > I'm sorry for the delay in getting back to say thank you to all of > you who offered some guidance - pressure of obligations in may > areas cut into my time somewhat. I have decided to give Debian a &g

Re: Debian Newbie need help - belated thank you to all

2011-04-03 Thread p3qwestra
I'm sorry for the delay in getting back to say thank you to all of you who offered some guidance - pressure of obligations in may areas cut into my time somewhat. I have decided to give Debian a miss yet again. I really is a bit too cumbersome. I am not new to computing with over 30

  1   2   >