On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:34:48AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 05:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
>
> > In article Gene Heskett
> wrote:
> > > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did)
> >
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:52:06 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> David Baron composed on 2015-10-25 14:53 (UTC+0200):
>
> > I started with wheezy 64 bit install and grub2. Did not have any clue how
> > it worked but it did. When upgraded to Sid, added a kernel and wanted to
> > keep the older on around
Your threading appears to be broken, possibly because you reply to
a digest article? I think this was in reply to Message-Id:
<201510260331.37495.ghesk...@shentel.net>
Quoting Martin Str|mberg (a...@ludd.luth.se):
> In article Gene Heskett
> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin
On Monday 26 October 2015 11:34:48 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 05:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > In article Gene Heskett
>
> wrote:
> > > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did)
> > > > part
On Monday 26 October 2015 05:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did)
> > > partitions of 200 MB size. I use the text based installer and
> > > man
On Monday 26 October 2015 09:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did) partitions of
> > > 200 MB size. I use the text based installer and manual par
In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did) partitions of
> > 200 MB size. I use the text based installer and manual partitioning.
> >
> On a 4k/sector, 2 terabyte disk? I tried from 500
On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > The worst part of that is that the partitioner will not accept a 1
> > gigabyte partition, which is a great plenty, so I was forced to use
> > 5% of the disk as a boot partition.
>
> I don't understa
In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> The worst part of that is that the partitioner will not accept a 1
> gigabyte partition, which is a great plenty, so I was forced to use 5%
> of the disk as a boot partition.
I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did) partitions of
200 MB size. I
David Baron composed on 2015-10-25 14:53 (UTC+0200):
> I started with wheezy 64 bit install and grub2. Did not have any clue how it
> worked but it did.
> When upgraded to Sid, added a kernel and wanted to keep the older on around
> just-in-case, I
> had no idea how to do this with Grub2 so I
On Sunday 25 October 2015 08:53:00 David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2015 08:19:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 October 2015 06:57:06 David Baron wrote:
> > > Using the live disk, went back to the old (failing!) 80gig disk,
> > > edited back to where I was, bound the /dev and chroo
David Baron composed on 2015-10-25 17:29 (UTC+0200):
> after the last adventure, what can I do?
Partition in advance of starting any installer. It's your machine. You get to
have it your way if you take the trouble to make it so. There's no good
excuse to get stuck with illogical partition alloca
> * * *
> > How do I make custom boot menus, kernel, init choices and such using the
> > Grub?
>
> Heh. For just updating the kernel, it's automatic in Wheezy and
> beyond. but for other purposes, it's a real riot. You might want to
> stay with lilo for the time being.
>
> But you do want to look
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:53 PM, David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2015 08:19:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 25 October 2015 06:57:06 David Baron wrote:
>
>> > Using the live disk, went back to the old (failing!) 80gig disk,
>
>> > edited back to where I was, bound the /dev and chro
On Sunday 25 October 2015 08:19:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 25 October 2015 06:57:06 David Baron wrote:
> > Using the live disk, went back to the old (failing!) 80gig disk,
> > edited back to where I was, bound the /dev and chroot and mounted what
> > I needed.
> > update-initramfs and lilo
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:57 PM, David Baron wrote:
> Using the live disk, went back to the old (failing!) 80gig disk, edited back
> to where I was, bound the /dev and chroot and mounted what I needed.
>
> update-initramfs and lilo worked without any segfault.
Up until here, I'm sort-of following
On Sunday 25 October 2015 06:57:06 David Baron wrote:
> Using the live disk, went back to the old (failing!) 80gig disk,
> edited back to where I was, bound the /dev and chroot and mounted what
> I needed.
> update-initramfs and lilo worked without any segfault.
>
> So back up. Time to buy another
Using the live disk, went back to the old (failing!) 80gig disk, edited
back to where I was, bound the /dev and chroot and mounted what I
needed.
update-initramfs and lilo worked without any segfault.
So back up. Time to buy another big disk and move stuff or reinstall
with Jesse. Trouble is th
Hi,
> Tried appending "single" to other commands.
Is this LILO related ? (Or what other commands, exactly ?)
It is not easy to imagine what you see and try.
> Took my root password which implies my users and
> passwords are intact!
The recognition of user and password relies on a very small
p
Hi,
after Brian's mail in another thread made me execute
systemctl list-units
i believe to understand what you meant with "LSB".
There's a lot of systemd units which have "LSB:" as prefix
of their description.
(But no "debug-shell.service", to my great relief.)
To quote Ben Hutchings from Debia
On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:39:45 d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
> Please confirm this is plain text :-)
:-)
I can read it now.
Your OP was totally incomprehensible here too. KMail-Trinity. Combined with
partial sight.
Lisi
Hi,
> From mount of root partition in Debian live session, moun --bind /dev to
> root partition's dev,
Do i get it right that are trying to start your hard disk installed
Linux from a running LiveCD Linux ?
Interesting stunt. But far from being standard.
> On booting, get errors. Can get to con
- Original Message -
From: Joel Rees
Date: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:34 am
Subject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!
To: d_ba...@012.net.il
Cc: debian-user
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: d_ba...@012.net.i
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Schmitt
Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:53 pm
Subject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Hi,
>
> > Hope all those >'s do not foul this up.
>
> No danger.
> The only problem with "
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: d_ba...@012.net.il
> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:18 am
> Subject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
>> - Original Message -
>>
Hi,
> Hope all those >'s do not foul this up.
No danger.
The only problem with ">" is the dreaded ">From" mailbox escape
which might be confused with ">From" meant as quote.
> I am using a Debian live CD. So that Kali business comes from there but is
> nowhere shown when running of the CD.
Str
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Schmitt
Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:31 pm
Subject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Hi,
>
> Disclaimer: I am much more programmer than sysadmin.
>
> d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
> > I had been
Hi,
Disclaimer: I am much more programmer than sysadmin.
d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
> I had been running an up-to-date Sid so
> maybe that is the problem. The lilo is on the partition,
It is unusual to combine Debian Sid with bootloader LILO.
Installation plants GRUB2 by default.
I never install
Hi,
d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
> I apologize for any unreadable gibberish. It does not look like that here,
> only in quoted replies from the thread.
It seems to become consensus that several different mail clients
were needed to mess it up.
So it seems wise to just give them all no chance by usin
d_ba...@012.net.il composed on 2015-10-21 20:45 (UTC+0300):
> ...So what can I do about this?
I'm unable to follow what happened due to lack of partition and disk details.
Maybe others who would try to help have the same problem. Provide output from
fdisk -l or gdisk -l and maybe the help limitat
Quoting Thomas Schmitt (scdbac...@gmx.net):
> as a bystander i must say that the involved mail clients
> invest much effort in making this thread a mess.
>
> In the archives, the initial message is quite readable
> but with seriously oversized lines:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/1
: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 4:58 pm
Subject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:32:40 +0300
d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
- Original Message -
From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate:
Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked --
Help!
To
I apologize for any unreadable gibberish. It does not look like that here, only
in quoted replies from the thread.
Due to the system dorked problem, I am stuck on the live distro. I can only
sensibly due email from the provider's mail site. Those gt signs which are
really what is fowling things
Version without any markup-interpreted markings- Original Message
-From: Renaud OLGIATI (Ron)Date:
Wednesday, October 21, 2015 4:58 pmSubject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!To:
debian-user@lists.debian.orgOn Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:32:40
+0300d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: - Original Message
Gene Heskett composed on 2015-10-21 10:53 (UTC-0400):
>> > > Quoting the relevant query: "So what can I do about this?"
>> > > Send properly formatted mail, so it is legible ?
>> > +1, this stuff isn't readable.
Readable as in legible, yes, but an unintelligible mess, so not really readable.
>
Hi,
as a bystander i must say that the involved mail clients
invest much effort in making this thread a mess.
In the archives, the initial message is quite readable
but with seriously oversized lines:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/10/msg01079.html
The two follow-ups by the original
rote:
> > > > - Original Message -From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate:
> > > > Wednesday,
> > > >
> > > > October 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!To:
> > > > >debian-user@lists.debian.org> - Original Message
Wednesday,
> > > October 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!To:
> > > >debian-user@lists.debian.org> - Original Message -> From:
> > > d_ba...@012.net.il> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:24 am>
> > > >Subject:
esday, October 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked --
> >> Help!To: >debian-user@lists.debian.org> - Original Message
> >> -> From: d_ba...@012.net.il> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015
> >> 10:24 am> >Subject: System Dorked -- Help!> T
On Wednesday 21 October 2015 09:56:18 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:32:40 +0300
>
> d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
> > - Original Message -From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate: Wednesday,
> > October 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked -- Help
On 21/10/15 14:56, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:32:40 +0300
d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
- Original Message -From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked --
Help!To: >debian-user@lists.debian.org> - Or
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:32:40 +0300
d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
> - Original Message -From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate: Wednesday, October
> 21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!To:
> >debian-user@lists.debian.org> - Original Message -> From:
> d_b
- Original Message -From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate: Wednesday, October
21, 2015 11:18 amSubject: Re: System Dorked -- Help!To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org> - Original Message -> From:
d_ba...@012.net.il> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:24 am> Subject: System
Do
- Original Message -From: d_ba...@012.net.ilDate: Wednesday, October
21, 2015 10:24 amSubject: System Dorked -- Help!To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org> After being warned of impending failure of my
oldie but goodie 80gig disk -- I had placed my root directory there because
After being warned of impending failure of my oldie but goodie 80gig disk -- I
had placed my root directory there because the installation's partition was too
small and did this successfully -- I moved the root directory to a partition on
another disk, edited files, ran lilo, seemingly successfu
45 matches
Mail list logo
