Matthias Szupryczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 18:28, Bill Wohler wrote:
>> I run testing and grab packages from unstable that are having a hard
>> time making it over to testing. This is a nice compromise between
>> stability and bleeding edge. You might consider
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 18:28, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Matthias Szupryczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am thinking to switch from stable to unstable these days. Is this
> > advisable at the moment, or is the unstable branch suffering from mayor
> > problems right now (libc broken etc.)
>
> I
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 00:08, Stephen A. Witt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Matthias Szupryczynski wrote:
> > I am thinking to switch from stable to unstable these days. Is this
> > advisable at the moment, or is the unstable branch suffering from mayor
> > problems right now (libc broken etc.)
>
>
Matthias Szupryczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am thinking to switch from stable to unstable these days. Is this
> advisable at the moment, or is the unstable branch suffering from mayor
> problems right now (libc broken etc.)
I run testing and grab packages from unstable that are havin
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Matthias Szupryczynski wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I am thinking to switch from stable to unstable these days. Is this
> advisable at the moment, or is the unstable branch suffering from mayor
> problems right now (libc broken etc.)
>
> Please cc to me as I am not on the list.
>
Wh
Hi list,
I am thinking to switch from stable to unstable these days. Is this
advisable at the moment, or is the unstable branch suffering from mayor
problems right now (libc broken etc.)
Please cc to me as I am not on the list.
Thanks
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
6 matches
Mail list logo
