On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 03:30:11 +0200, Oki DZ wrote:
> I forgot, I have these settings too:
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo "1" >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies echo "1" >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_abort_on_overflow echo "600" >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_k
I forgot, I have these settings too:
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_abort_on_overflow
echo "600" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time
echo "60" > /proc/sys/net/
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:37:41PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Please post more information. Software used, versions, timing, etc.
Here we go.
bdg:~# uname -a
Linux bdg 2.4.20-lkcd #3 Tue Jul 1 12:45:14 WIT 2003 i686 unknown unknown
GNU/Linuxbdg:~# more /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_i
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:12:01AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On every megabyte in swapspace, how much does it take the space in the
> memory (RAM)? Is the two times the amount of memory rule basically the
> maximum? Problem is, I keep getting "Out of socket memory" error, and
> usually the
Hi,
On every megabyte in swapspace, how much does it take the space in the
memory (RAM)? Is the two times the amount of memory rule basically the
maximum? Problem is, I keep getting "Out of socket memory" error, and
usually the system crashes (I installed lkcd, though) in less than a week.
I h
-Original Message-
From: Karl E. Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:17 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Swapfiles
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:44:16AM -0400, Smith, Brian N. wrote:
> >John Hasler wrote
> >I wrote:
> >> Ex
Joe Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> > "Oki" == Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Oki> Hi, On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it
> > Oki> handle? Would it be all right to assign it 384Mbytes?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:44:16AM -0400, Smith, Brian N. wrote:
> >John Hasler wrote
> >I wrote:
> >> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> >> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
>
> >Karsten writes:
> >> Is this a GNU/Linux thing or a more gener
> >> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> >> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
> I am a little puzzled by the comment "executables do not use swap" and I
> have to admit computer design is not my forte.
You need swap for data because the compu
>John Hasler wrote
>I wrote:
>> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
>> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
>Karsten writes:
>> Is this a GNU/Linux thing or a more general Unix/POSIX thing?
>Neither. It's a virtual-memory thing. It's the obvi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> "Oki" == Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Oki> Hi, On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it
> Oki> handle? Would it be all right to assign it 384Mbytes?
>
> Yes.
>
> I typically assign twice as much swa
rg
> Subject: Re: Swapfiles
>
>
> But I don't remember clearly if they were able to do paging on 286
> systems.
> They were working to support the 386 while I was working there, maybe they
> only
> had paging on 386, I don't know. I do seem to re
I used to do tech support for Microport System V/AT. It was Unix System V
ported to 80286 IBM AT's.
When I started work there, Microport had swapping. A program would be read into
memory in its entirety, or it would be disk resident. It wasn't paged. A
program's memory was swapped out to d
I remember `demand paging' on the PDP-11, which predates the VAX.
--
Sincerely,
David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.
On 17 Apr 2002, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> > use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap
I wrote:
> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
Karsten writes:
> Is this a GNU/Linux thing or a more general Unix/POSIX thing?
Neither. It's a virtual-memory thing. It's the obvious thing to do as
soon as y
on Tue, Apr 16, 2002, John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Karsten writes:
> > Swap is there for programs that are, er, swapped.
>
> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
Hmm...interesting.
References?
uesday, April 16, 2002 10:47 AM
Subject: Swapfiles
Hi,
On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it handle? Would it be all
right to assign it 384Mbytes?
TIA,
Oki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTEC
Karsten writes:
> Swap is there for programs that are, er, swapped.
Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never use
any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
on Tue, Apr 16, 2002, Oki DZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it handle? Would it be all
> right to assign it 384Mbytes?
I tend toward 2-3 times physical RAM for swap, as swap partitions, on
the following basis:
- Despite arguments that as
begin Oki DZ quotation:
>
> On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it handle? Would it be all
> right to assign it 384Mbytes?
Short answer: yes.
Long answer:
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/sag/swap-allocation.html
Of special interest would be this line:
"If your calculated swap space is v
"Oki" == Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Oki> Hi, On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it
Oki> handle? Would it be all right to assign it 384Mbytes?
Yes.
I typically assign twice as much swap as RAM, I no longer remember the
rationale behind it, but there's nothing wron
Hi,
On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it handle? Would it be all
right to assign it 384Mbytes?
TIA,
Oki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MRZ said:
> With the price of RAM being what it is, I recently upgraded my
> potato box to by 512MB ram. So I now have roughly 640MB RAM with a
> 256MB swapfile.
>
> Now that I have this much physical memory I was wondering if I
> could drop the swapfile altogether and reclaim some HD space for
>
MRZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With the price of RAM being what it is, I recently upgraded my potato box to
> by 512MB ram.
> So I now have roughly 640MB RAM with a 256MB swapfile.
>
> Now that I have this much physical memory I was wondering if I could drop
> the swapfile altogether and rec
With the price of RAM being what it is, I recently upgraded my potato box to by
512MB ram.
So I now have roughly 640MB RAM with a 256MB swapfile.
Now that I have this much physical memory I was wondering if I could drop
the swapfile altogether and reclaim some HD space for filesystem use.
I'd a
25 matches
Mail list logo
