On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Alec Berryman wrote:
> I know that raid1 swap will not be faster than two swap partitions of
> equal priority; however, I'm more worried about reliability.
any disk that crashed that had used swap space will hang the system
any unused swap space is not an issue and will no
begin quotation of Alvin Oga on 2004-07-28 15:41:22 -0700:
> > I've been setting up software RAID1 and am wondering what to do about
> > swap. According to the Software-RAID-HOWTO
> > (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-2.html), there's
> > apparently an 'ongoing debate' on the virtue
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Alec Berryman wrote:
> I've been setting up software RAID1 and am wondering what to do about
> swap. According to the Software-RAID-HOWTO
> (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-2.html), there's
> apparently an 'ongoing debate' on the virtues of using software RAID1
I've been setting up software RAID1 and am wondering what to do about
swap. According to the Software-RAID-HOWTO
(http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-2.html), there's
apparently an 'ongoing debate' on the virtues of using software RAID1
with swap.
I currently have same-sized partitions
4 matches
Mail list logo
