On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:08:36 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>> Mmm, and why not center the attention in the application which is not
>> acting as it should? If something is wrong at powerdevil's side it
>> should be corrected/fixed/solved/debugged there.
>>
>
> Hi Camaleon,
>
> the point is: pow
> Mmm, and why not center the attention in the application which is not
> acting as it should? If something is wrong at powerdevil's side it should
> be corrected/fixed/solved/debugged there.
>
> Greetings,
Hi Camaleon,
the point is: powerdevil got this function earlier, but the developers som
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:36:58 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> As powerdevil changed last year, I found no way, to force the cpu to
> stay at lowest clock, even when a process wants full speed.
>
> My solution at the moment is, to use cpufreq-set, where I can set the
> cpu to lowest frequency.
>
>
On 15/01/12 21:48, Ralf Madorf wrote:
PolicyKit
It would help if you could give a little more insightpointers on how to
do it? ;)
Lorenzo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archiv
PolicyKit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1326664115.1178.189.camel@localhost.localdomain
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:36:58PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Dear list,
> please let me describe a little problem.
>
> As powerdevil changed last year, I found no way, to force the cpu to stay at
> lowest clock, even when a process wants full speed.
>
> My solution at the moment is, to use
Dear list,
please let me describe a little problem.
As powerdevil changed last year, I found no way, to force the cpu to stay at
lowest clock, even when a process wants full speed.
My solution at the moment is, to use cpufreq-set, where I can set the cpu to
lowest frequency.
But there is a pro
7 matches
Mail list logo
